假设核爆炸后社区屏蔽对辐射风险的影响

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Osamong Gideon Akou , Xuan Wang , Shuhuan Liu , Xinwei Liu , Guanghui Su , Ailing Zhang , Junfang Zhang , Minghua Lv , Lei Huang , Shanchao Yang
{"title":"假设核爆炸后社区屏蔽对辐射风险的影响","authors":"Osamong Gideon Akou ,&nbsp;Xuan Wang ,&nbsp;Shuhuan Liu ,&nbsp;Xinwei Liu ,&nbsp;Guanghui Su ,&nbsp;Ailing Zhang ,&nbsp;Junfang Zhang ,&nbsp;Minghua Lv ,&nbsp;Lei Huang ,&nbsp;Shanchao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impact of a nuclear explosion is uncertain due to various factors such as the size of the explosion, the altitude at which it occurs, the weather conditions, and the surrounding terrain. Fission products released can have short-term or long-term effects, potentially leading to mortality. This study examined the effects of hypothetical nuclear detonations of 15 kT and 21 kT in a community using the HotSpot code. The main variables considered were shielding, wind speed, explosion power, time spent in the explosion zone, protection factors, and structure thickness. Existing structures significantly reduce external dose, prompt gamma, prompt neutron, and fallout. While a 21 kT explosion is more lethal than 15 kT, shielding is effective in attenuating radiation for both explosions. Proximity and duration of exposure to the explosion zone increase radiation effects. At higher velocities (4.5 m/s), the plume spreads more. High shielding effectiveness corresponds to low external dose levels. Concrete shielding is particularly more effective in attenuating and scattering radiation. Our study provides valuable guidance for decision-makers and the public on mitigation measures and sheltering prioritization in the event of a nuclear explosion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"436 ","pages":"Article 113986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of community shielding on radiological risk following a hypothetical nuclear explosion\",\"authors\":\"Osamong Gideon Akou ,&nbsp;Xuan Wang ,&nbsp;Shuhuan Liu ,&nbsp;Xinwei Liu ,&nbsp;Guanghui Su ,&nbsp;Ailing Zhang ,&nbsp;Junfang Zhang ,&nbsp;Minghua Lv ,&nbsp;Lei Huang ,&nbsp;Shanchao Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The impact of a nuclear explosion is uncertain due to various factors such as the size of the explosion, the altitude at which it occurs, the weather conditions, and the surrounding terrain. Fission products released can have short-term or long-term effects, potentially leading to mortality. This study examined the effects of hypothetical nuclear detonations of 15 kT and 21 kT in a community using the HotSpot code. The main variables considered were shielding, wind speed, explosion power, time spent in the explosion zone, protection factors, and structure thickness. Existing structures significantly reduce external dose, prompt gamma, prompt neutron, and fallout. While a 21 kT explosion is more lethal than 15 kT, shielding is effective in attenuating radiation for both explosions. Proximity and duration of exposure to the explosion zone increase radiation effects. At higher velocities (4.5 m/s), the plume spreads more. High shielding effectiveness corresponds to low external dose levels. Concrete shielding is particularly more effective in attenuating and scattering radiation. Our study provides valuable guidance for decision-makers and the public on mitigation measures and sheltering prioritization in the event of a nuclear explosion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Design\",\"volume\":\"436 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Engineering and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325001633\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325001633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核爆炸的影响是不确定的,因为各种因素,如爆炸的大小,发生的高度,天气条件和周围的地形。释放的裂变产物可能有短期或长期的影响,可能导致死亡。本研究在一个使用热点代码的社区中检验了假设的15kt和21kt核爆炸的影响。考虑的主要变量是屏蔽、风速、爆炸功率、在爆炸区域停留的时间、防护系数和结构厚度。现有结构显著减少了外部剂量、瞬发伽马、瞬发中子和放射性沉降。虽然21 kT爆炸比15 kT爆炸更致命,但屏蔽在两种爆炸中都能有效地衰减辐射。暴露在爆炸区的距离和持续时间增加了辐射效应。在更高的速度下(4.5米/秒),羽流扩散得更多。高屏蔽效能对应于低外部剂量水平。混凝土屏蔽在衰减和散射辐射方面尤其有效。我们的研究为决策者和公众提供了有价值的指导,以确定核爆炸时的缓解措施和庇护优先次序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of community shielding on radiological risk following a hypothetical nuclear explosion
The impact of a nuclear explosion is uncertain due to various factors such as the size of the explosion, the altitude at which it occurs, the weather conditions, and the surrounding terrain. Fission products released can have short-term or long-term effects, potentially leading to mortality. This study examined the effects of hypothetical nuclear detonations of 15 kT and 21 kT in a community using the HotSpot code. The main variables considered were shielding, wind speed, explosion power, time spent in the explosion zone, protection factors, and structure thickness. Existing structures significantly reduce external dose, prompt gamma, prompt neutron, and fallout. While a 21 kT explosion is more lethal than 15 kT, shielding is effective in attenuating radiation for both explosions. Proximity and duration of exposure to the explosion zone increase radiation effects. At higher velocities (4.5 m/s), the plume spreads more. High shielding effectiveness corresponds to low external dose levels. Concrete shielding is particularly more effective in attenuating and scattering radiation. Our study provides valuable guidance for decision-makers and the public on mitigation measures and sheltering prioritization in the event of a nuclear explosion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信