“他们只是想要在他们的生活中永远在那里的人”:治疗性住宿护理中儿童和年轻人的永久性概念模型

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Tatiana Corrales , Patricia McNamara , Brett Smith , Howard Bath , Ellysha Clark , Kelly-Lee Goodchild , Sarah Grabda , Mark Harrison , Barry McGrady
{"title":"“他们只是想要在他们的生活中永远在那里的人”:治疗性住宿护理中儿童和年轻人的永久性概念模型","authors":"Tatiana Corrales ,&nbsp;Patricia McNamara ,&nbsp;Brett Smith ,&nbsp;Howard Bath ,&nbsp;Ellysha Clark ,&nbsp;Kelly-Lee Goodchild ,&nbsp;Sarah Grabda ,&nbsp;Mark Harrison ,&nbsp;Barry McGrady","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Australian child protection systems, permanency outcomes are primarily equated with stability in a child’s living and caring arrangements. For some children this will mean restoration to family, but for many others it will involve long-term Out-of-Home Care (OOHC), including with extended family. When viewed through the lens of living and caring arrangements, permanency policies by necessity exclude children and young people in residential care, for whom their caring arrangement is intended to be time-limited – that is – impermanent. However, for some children and young people, residential care is the only ‘permanent’ placement option that is available. Understanding whether and how permanency is considered and operationalised within residential care contexts is therefore an important, but largely absent area of research and policy. This paper describes a conceptual model of permanency for children and young people in therapeutic residential care programs in four Australian states. In-depth interviews and focus groups were conducted with 21 participants from therapeutic residential care providers in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and South Australia. Using Reflexive Thematic Analysis, we propose a conceptual model that places a child and young person’s sense of connection and belonging at the centre of permanency. This necessitates creating safe, stable environments that foster safe and enduring relationships with unpaid carers and other key people who are meaningful to the child. We discuss the implications of embedding a relational understanding of permanency within therapeutic residential care programs to improve the wellbeing of children and their families.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 108211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“They just want people in their lives that will be there forever”: A conceptual model of permanency for children and young people in therapeutic residential care\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana Corrales ,&nbsp;Patricia McNamara ,&nbsp;Brett Smith ,&nbsp;Howard Bath ,&nbsp;Ellysha Clark ,&nbsp;Kelly-Lee Goodchild ,&nbsp;Sarah Grabda ,&nbsp;Mark Harrison ,&nbsp;Barry McGrady\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In Australian child protection systems, permanency outcomes are primarily equated with stability in a child’s living and caring arrangements. For some children this will mean restoration to family, but for many others it will involve long-term Out-of-Home Care (OOHC), including with extended family. When viewed through the lens of living and caring arrangements, permanency policies by necessity exclude children and young people in residential care, for whom their caring arrangement is intended to be time-limited – that is – impermanent. However, for some children and young people, residential care is the only ‘permanent’ placement option that is available. Understanding whether and how permanency is considered and operationalised within residential care contexts is therefore an important, but largely absent area of research and policy. This paper describes a conceptual model of permanency for children and young people in therapeutic residential care programs in four Australian states. In-depth interviews and focus groups were conducted with 21 participants from therapeutic residential care providers in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and South Australia. Using Reflexive Thematic Analysis, we propose a conceptual model that places a child and young person’s sense of connection and belonging at the centre of permanency. This necessitates creating safe, stable environments that foster safe and enduring relationships with unpaid carers and other key people who are meaningful to the child. We discuss the implications of embedding a relational understanding of permanency within therapeutic residential care programs to improve the wellbeing of children and their families.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"volume\":\"172 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Children and Youth Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925000945\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925000945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在澳大利亚的儿童保护系统中,永久性的结果主要等同于儿童生活和照料安排的稳定性。对一些孩子来说,这意味着回归家庭,但对许多其他孩子来说,这将涉及长期的家庭外护理(OOHC),包括大家庭。从生活和照顾安排的角度来看,永久性政策必然排除住在院舍的儿童和青少年,因为他们的照顾安排是有时间限制的,即不是永久性的。然而,对于一些儿童和年轻人来说,寄宿照料是唯一可用的“永久”安置选择。因此,了解在住宿护理环境中是否考虑永久性以及如何考虑永久性是一个重要的,但在很大程度上缺乏研究和政策的领域。本文描述了永久性的概念模型的儿童和青少年在治疗住宿护理方案在四个澳大利亚州。对来自新南威尔士州、维多利亚州、昆士兰州和南澳大利亚州的21名治疗性住宿护理提供者进行了深入访谈和焦点小组。利用反身性主题分析,我们提出了一个概念模型,将儿童和年轻人的联系感和归属感置于永久性的中心。这就需要创造安全、稳定的环境,促进儿童与无报酬的照料者和其他对儿童有意义的关键人物建立安全和持久的关系。我们讨论了在治疗性住宿护理项目中嵌入对持久性的关系理解的含义,以改善儿童及其家庭的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“They just want people in their lives that will be there forever”: A conceptual model of permanency for children and young people in therapeutic residential care
In Australian child protection systems, permanency outcomes are primarily equated with stability in a child’s living and caring arrangements. For some children this will mean restoration to family, but for many others it will involve long-term Out-of-Home Care (OOHC), including with extended family. When viewed through the lens of living and caring arrangements, permanency policies by necessity exclude children and young people in residential care, for whom their caring arrangement is intended to be time-limited – that is – impermanent. However, for some children and young people, residential care is the only ‘permanent’ placement option that is available. Understanding whether and how permanency is considered and operationalised within residential care contexts is therefore an important, but largely absent area of research and policy. This paper describes a conceptual model of permanency for children and young people in therapeutic residential care programs in four Australian states. In-depth interviews and focus groups were conducted with 21 participants from therapeutic residential care providers in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and South Australia. Using Reflexive Thematic Analysis, we propose a conceptual model that places a child and young person’s sense of connection and belonging at the centre of permanency. This necessitates creating safe, stable environments that foster safe and enduring relationships with unpaid carers and other key people who are meaningful to the child. We discuss the implications of embedding a relational understanding of permanency within therapeutic residential care programs to improve the wellbeing of children and their families.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信