辅助放疗方式对早期子宫癌肉瘤临床预后的影响

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kevin Tyan , Kevin X. Liu , Alicia C. Smart , Colleen M. Feltmate , Neil S. Horowitz , Michael G. Muto , Michael J. Worley Jr. , Kevin M. Elias , Joyce F. Liu , Alexi A. Wright , Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos , Susana M. Campos , Ursula A. Matulonis , Idalid Franco , Larissa J. Lee , Martin T. King , M. Aiven Dyer
{"title":"辅助放疗方式对早期子宫癌肉瘤临床预后的影响","authors":"Kevin Tyan ,&nbsp;Kevin X. Liu ,&nbsp;Alicia C. Smart ,&nbsp;Colleen M. Feltmate ,&nbsp;Neil S. Horowitz ,&nbsp;Michael G. Muto ,&nbsp;Michael J. Worley Jr. ,&nbsp;Kevin M. Elias ,&nbsp;Joyce F. Liu ,&nbsp;Alexi A. Wright ,&nbsp;Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos ,&nbsp;Susana M. Campos ,&nbsp;Ursula A. Matulonis ,&nbsp;Idalid Franco ,&nbsp;Larissa J. Lee ,&nbsp;Martin T. King ,&nbsp;M. Aiven Dyer","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There are limited data around adjuvant radiotherapy following surgical management for patients with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). We compared outcomes for patients with early-stage UCS who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) vs. CT and vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) vs. radiation therapy (EBRT or VBT) alone.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed of patients diagnosed with FIGO stage I-II UCS from 2002 to 2020 who received adjuvant radiotherapy, with or without CT, following definitive surgery. Clinical and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes were assessed. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used for clinical outcomes. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used for multivariable analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>98 patients were analyzed, of whom 38 received CT + EBRT, 31 received CT + VBT, and 29 received RT-alone (18 EBRT, 11 VBT). For the CT + EBRT, CT + VBT, and RT-alone groups, median follow up was 93.5, 50.2, and 143.0 months, and 3-year PFS was 78.7 %, 67.6 %, and 58.2 %, respectively. CT + EBRT was associated with improved PFS compared to RT alone (<em>p</em> = 0.01), but not compared to CT + VBT (<em>p</em> = 0.22). There were 4 locoregional recurrences in the CT + EBRT group (10.5 %), 8 in the CT + VBT group (25.8 %), and 5 in the RT-alone group (17.2 %). On multivariable analysis, RT-alone trended towards shorter time to progression (TTP) compared to CT + EBRT (<em>p</em> = 0.05), with similar TTP compared to CT + VBT (<em>p</em> = 0.83).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In one of the largest retrospective cohorts of early-stage UCS, adjuvant CT + EBRT, but not CT + VBT, improved outcomes compared to RT-alone. Larger prospective studies are needed to investigate the role of different radiation modalities in UCS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"195 ","pages":"Pages 75-81"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of adjuvant radiotherapy modality on clinical outcomes for early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Tyan ,&nbsp;Kevin X. Liu ,&nbsp;Alicia C. Smart ,&nbsp;Colleen M. Feltmate ,&nbsp;Neil S. Horowitz ,&nbsp;Michael G. Muto ,&nbsp;Michael J. Worley Jr. ,&nbsp;Kevin M. Elias ,&nbsp;Joyce F. Liu ,&nbsp;Alexi A. Wright ,&nbsp;Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos ,&nbsp;Susana M. Campos ,&nbsp;Ursula A. Matulonis ,&nbsp;Idalid Franco ,&nbsp;Larissa J. Lee ,&nbsp;Martin T. King ,&nbsp;M. Aiven Dyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There are limited data around adjuvant radiotherapy following surgical management for patients with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). We compared outcomes for patients with early-stage UCS who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) vs. CT and vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) vs. radiation therapy (EBRT or VBT) alone.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed of patients diagnosed with FIGO stage I-II UCS from 2002 to 2020 who received adjuvant radiotherapy, with or without CT, following definitive surgery. Clinical and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes were assessed. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used for clinical outcomes. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used for multivariable analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>98 patients were analyzed, of whom 38 received CT + EBRT, 31 received CT + VBT, and 29 received RT-alone (18 EBRT, 11 VBT). For the CT + EBRT, CT + VBT, and RT-alone groups, median follow up was 93.5, 50.2, and 143.0 months, and 3-year PFS was 78.7 %, 67.6 %, and 58.2 %, respectively. CT + EBRT was associated with improved PFS compared to RT alone (<em>p</em> = 0.01), but not compared to CT + VBT (<em>p</em> = 0.22). There were 4 locoregional recurrences in the CT + EBRT group (10.5 %), 8 in the CT + VBT group (25.8 %), and 5 in the RT-alone group (17.2 %). On multivariable analysis, RT-alone trended towards shorter time to progression (TTP) compared to CT + EBRT (<em>p</em> = 0.05), with similar TTP compared to CT + VBT (<em>p</em> = 0.83).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In one of the largest retrospective cohorts of early-stage UCS, adjuvant CT + EBRT, but not CT + VBT, improved outcomes compared to RT-alone. Larger prospective studies are needed to investigate the role of different radiation modalities in UCS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 75-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825000733\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825000733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于早期子宫癌肉瘤(UCS)手术后辅助放疗的资料有限。我们比较了早期UCS患者接受辅助化疗(CT)和盆腔外束放疗(EBRT)与CT和阴道近距离治疗(VBT)与单独放疗(EBRT或VBT)的结果。方法回顾性分析2002年至2020年确诊为FIGO期I-II期UCS的患者在最终手术后接受辅助放疗(伴或不伴CT)的病例。评估临床和治疗特点及临床结果。临床结果采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验。采用Cox比例风险模型进行多变量分析。结果共分析98例患者,其中38例接受CT + EBRT, 31例接受CT + VBT, 29例单独接受rt (EBRT 18例,VBT 11例)。对于CT + EBRT、CT + VBT和单独rt组,中位随访时间分别为93.5、50.2和143.0个月,3年PFS分别为78.7%、67.6%和58.2%。与单独RT相比,CT + EBRT与PFS改善相关(p = 0.01),但与CT + VBT相比无相关性(p = 0.22)。CT + EBRT组有4例局部复发(10.5%),CT + VBT组有8例(25.8%),单独rt组有5例(17.2%)。在多变量分析中,与CT + EBRT相比,单独rt趋向于更短的进展时间(TTP) (p = 0.05),与CT + VBT相比TTP相似(p = 0.83)。结论在早期UCS的一个最大的回顾性队列中,与单独rt相比,辅助CT + EBRT而不是CT + VBT改善了预后。需要更大的前瞻性研究来调查不同的辐射方式在UCS中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of adjuvant radiotherapy modality on clinical outcomes for early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma

Background

There are limited data around adjuvant radiotherapy following surgical management for patients with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). We compared outcomes for patients with early-stage UCS who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) vs. CT and vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) vs. radiation therapy (EBRT or VBT) alone.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients diagnosed with FIGO stage I-II UCS from 2002 to 2020 who received adjuvant radiotherapy, with or without CT, following definitive surgery. Clinical and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes were assessed. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used for clinical outcomes. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used for multivariable analysis.

Results

98 patients were analyzed, of whom 38 received CT + EBRT, 31 received CT + VBT, and 29 received RT-alone (18 EBRT, 11 VBT). For the CT + EBRT, CT + VBT, and RT-alone groups, median follow up was 93.5, 50.2, and 143.0 months, and 3-year PFS was 78.7 %, 67.6 %, and 58.2 %, respectively. CT + EBRT was associated with improved PFS compared to RT alone (p = 0.01), but not compared to CT + VBT (p = 0.22). There were 4 locoregional recurrences in the CT + EBRT group (10.5 %), 8 in the CT + VBT group (25.8 %), and 5 in the RT-alone group (17.2 %). On multivariable analysis, RT-alone trended towards shorter time to progression (TTP) compared to CT + EBRT (p = 0.05), with similar TTP compared to CT + VBT (p = 0.83).

Conclusions

In one of the largest retrospective cohorts of early-stage UCS, adjuvant CT + EBRT, but not CT + VBT, improved outcomes compared to RT-alone. Larger prospective studies are needed to investigate the role of different radiation modalities in UCS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic oncology
Gynecologic oncology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published. Research Areas Include: • Cell and molecular biology • Chemotherapy • Cytology • Endocrinology • Epidemiology • Genetics • Gynecologic surgery • Immunology • Pathology • Radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信