通勤模式与大学生的幸福感:调查努力对主观幸福感和自主感的作用

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Finn Simonn , Nadja Schweiggart , Adnan Muhammad Shah , Haoye Sun
{"title":"通勤模式与大学生的幸福感:调查努力对主观幸福感和自主感的作用","authors":"Finn Simonn ,&nbsp;Nadja Schweiggart ,&nbsp;Adnan Muhammad Shah ,&nbsp;Haoye Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study highlights the significant impact of commuting on the wellbeing of university students and examines the effects of commuting effort across different modes on students’ perceived autonomy (decisional and affective) and subjective wellbeing (cognitive and affective).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Conducting a survey among 208 university students in Hamburg, Germany, the study used structural equation modeling to investigate how the effort level associated with commuting (classified as low, medium, high) influences wellbeing dimensions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings show that high-effort commuting modes positively correlate with decisional autonomy and cognitive wellbeing. Furthermore, both high- and low-effort commuting modes enhance affective autonomy, while intermodal commuting negatively affects it. The research also indicates that the need for autonomy moderates the relationship between low-effort commuting modes and affective autonomy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These insights provide guidance for universities seeking to improve student wellbeing and policymakers focused on urban planning and transportation strategies, especially in large urban areas such as Hamburg.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 102017"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commuting mode and university students’ wellbeing: Investigating the role of effort on subjective wellbeing and perceived autonomy\",\"authors\":\"Finn Simonn ,&nbsp;Nadja Schweiggart ,&nbsp;Adnan Muhammad Shah ,&nbsp;Haoye Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study highlights the significant impact of commuting on the wellbeing of university students and examines the effects of commuting effort across different modes on students’ perceived autonomy (decisional and affective) and subjective wellbeing (cognitive and affective).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Conducting a survey among 208 university students in Hamburg, Germany, the study used structural equation modeling to investigate how the effort level associated with commuting (classified as low, medium, high) influences wellbeing dimensions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings show that high-effort commuting modes positively correlate with decisional autonomy and cognitive wellbeing. Furthermore, both high- and low-effort commuting modes enhance affective autonomy, while intermodal commuting negatively affects it. The research also indicates that the need for autonomy moderates the relationship between low-effort commuting modes and affective autonomy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These insights provide guidance for universities seeking to improve student wellbeing and policymakers focused on urban planning and transportation strategies, especially in large urban areas such as Hamburg.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000374\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commuting mode and university students’ wellbeing: Investigating the role of effort on subjective wellbeing and perceived autonomy

Introduction

This study highlights the significant impact of commuting on the wellbeing of university students and examines the effects of commuting effort across different modes on students’ perceived autonomy (decisional and affective) and subjective wellbeing (cognitive and affective).

Methods

Conducting a survey among 208 university students in Hamburg, Germany, the study used structural equation modeling to investigate how the effort level associated with commuting (classified as low, medium, high) influences wellbeing dimensions.

Results

Findings show that high-effort commuting modes positively correlate with decisional autonomy and cognitive wellbeing. Furthermore, both high- and low-effort commuting modes enhance affective autonomy, while intermodal commuting negatively affects it. The research also indicates that the need for autonomy moderates the relationship between low-effort commuting modes and affective autonomy.

Conclusions

These insights provide guidance for universities seeking to improve student wellbeing and policymakers focused on urban planning and transportation strategies, especially in large urban areas such as Hamburg.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信