巴黎时代的气候治理:有组织的不负责任、技术官僚的气候未来和常态化的灾害

Florian Steig, Angela Oels
{"title":"巴黎时代的气候治理:有组织的不负责任、技术官僚的气候未来和常态化的灾害","authors":"Florian Steig, Angela Oels","doi":"10.1002/wcc.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foucauldian governmentality studies of climate politics have established themselves as a vibrant field of research, illuminating the power‐knowledge‐formations inherent in governing climate change. Synthesizing the contributions of climate governmentality studies since 2015, we provide a critical assessment of the technologies of government and the resulting visibilities and identities in the context of the Paris Agreement. Our reading of the current “cli‐mentality” reveals a much higher continuity from the Kyoto era to the Paris era than generally assumed by dominant IR approaches. The cli‐mentality of the Paris era radicalizes the neoliberal approach of the Kyoto era while extending its reach into more policy sectors. The responsibilisation of states, sub‐state actors and individuals obscures root causes of the climate crisis and reproduces key elements of the socio‐economic and political order. The dominant problematisation of climate change in both academia and policymaking narrows down the solution space for climate politics and forecloses transformative approaches. Climate mitigation mobilizes neoliberal self‐governance through nationally‐determined contributions while obscuring unequal historical responsibilities. Adaptation is organized in depoliticized processes of preparing for presumably inevitable climate futures. This is reinforced by climate finance which employs financialisation and de‐risking to mobilize additional private capital. Climate‐related loss and damage funding is rendered as charity, foreclosing liability and reparation claims. Future research should examine (1) how the dominant cli‐mentality is resisted and challenged by social movements and climate litigation, (2) if and how it is stabilized through the global economic order and its regulations, and (3) which globally varying effects the cli‐mentality has.","PeriodicalId":501019,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Climate Change","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governing the Climate in the Paris Era: Organized Irresponsibility, Technocratic Climate Futures, and Normalized Disasters\",\"authors\":\"Florian Steig, Angela Oels\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wcc.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Foucauldian governmentality studies of climate politics have established themselves as a vibrant field of research, illuminating the power‐knowledge‐formations inherent in governing climate change. Synthesizing the contributions of climate governmentality studies since 2015, we provide a critical assessment of the technologies of government and the resulting visibilities and identities in the context of the Paris Agreement. Our reading of the current “cli‐mentality” reveals a much higher continuity from the Kyoto era to the Paris era than generally assumed by dominant IR approaches. The cli‐mentality of the Paris era radicalizes the neoliberal approach of the Kyoto era while extending its reach into more policy sectors. The responsibilisation of states, sub‐state actors and individuals obscures root causes of the climate crisis and reproduces key elements of the socio‐economic and political order. The dominant problematisation of climate change in both academia and policymaking narrows down the solution space for climate politics and forecloses transformative approaches. Climate mitigation mobilizes neoliberal self‐governance through nationally‐determined contributions while obscuring unequal historical responsibilities. Adaptation is organized in depoliticized processes of preparing for presumably inevitable climate futures. This is reinforced by climate finance which employs financialisation and de‐risking to mobilize additional private capital. Climate‐related loss and damage funding is rendered as charity, foreclosing liability and reparation claims. Future research should examine (1) how the dominant cli‐mentality is resisted and challenged by social movements and climate litigation, (2) if and how it is stabilized through the global economic order and its regulations, and (3) which globally varying effects the cli‐mentality has.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs Climate Change\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs Climate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.70001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

福柯式的气候政治治理研究已经成为一个充满活力的研究领域,阐明了治理气候变化所固有的权力-知识-形成。综合2015年以来气候治理研究的贡献,我们在《巴黎协定》的背景下对政府技术以及由此产生的可见度和身份进行了批判性评估。我们对当前“cli心态”的解读表明,从京都时代到巴黎时代的连续性比主流IR方法通常假设的要高得多。巴黎时代的命令心态将京都时代的新自由主义方法激进化,同时将其影响力扩展到更多的政策领域。国家、次国家行为体和个人的责任模糊了气候危机的根本原因,重现了社会经济和政治秩序的关键要素。气候变化问题化在学术界和政策制定中占主导地位,缩小了气候政治的解决方案空间,阻碍了变革方法的发展。气候减缓通过国家自主贡献动员新自由主义自治,同时模糊了不平等的历史责任。适应是在为可能不可避免的未来气候做准备的非政治化过程中组织起来的。气候融资通过金融化和去风险来调动额外的私人资本,从而加强了这一点。与气候相关的损失和损害资金以慈善形式提供,排除了责任和赔偿要求。未来的研究应该考察(1)主导的命令心态如何受到社会运动和气候诉讼的抵制和挑战,(2)它是否以及如何通过全球经济秩序及其法规稳定下来,以及(3)命令心态在全球范围内具有哪些不同的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governing the Climate in the Paris Era: Organized Irresponsibility, Technocratic Climate Futures, and Normalized Disasters
Foucauldian governmentality studies of climate politics have established themselves as a vibrant field of research, illuminating the power‐knowledge‐formations inherent in governing climate change. Synthesizing the contributions of climate governmentality studies since 2015, we provide a critical assessment of the technologies of government and the resulting visibilities and identities in the context of the Paris Agreement. Our reading of the current “cli‐mentality” reveals a much higher continuity from the Kyoto era to the Paris era than generally assumed by dominant IR approaches. The cli‐mentality of the Paris era radicalizes the neoliberal approach of the Kyoto era while extending its reach into more policy sectors. The responsibilisation of states, sub‐state actors and individuals obscures root causes of the climate crisis and reproduces key elements of the socio‐economic and political order. The dominant problematisation of climate change in both academia and policymaking narrows down the solution space for climate politics and forecloses transformative approaches. Climate mitigation mobilizes neoliberal self‐governance through nationally‐determined contributions while obscuring unequal historical responsibilities. Adaptation is organized in depoliticized processes of preparing for presumably inevitable climate futures. This is reinforced by climate finance which employs financialisation and de‐risking to mobilize additional private capital. Climate‐related loss and damage funding is rendered as charity, foreclosing liability and reparation claims. Future research should examine (1) how the dominant cli‐mentality is resisted and challenged by social movements and climate litigation, (2) if and how it is stabilized through the global economic order and its regulations, and (3) which globally varying effects the cli‐mentality has.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信