[直接观察程序技能作为获得护理程序能力的评估工具:范围审查]。

Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.4067/s0034-98872024001101162
Bernardita Osorio, Rodrigo A Sepúlveda, María Elisa Espinoza, Alejandro Delfino
{"title":"[直接观察程序技能作为获得护理程序能力的评估工具:范围审查]。","authors":"Bernardita Osorio, Rodrigo A Sepúlveda, María Elisa Espinoza, Alejandro Delfino","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024001101162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) guidelines are designed for the assessment of procedural skills in the workplace and could be a useful tool for evaluating these competencies in nursing education.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the use, facilitating factors, and barriers influencing the implementation of DOPS guidelines as a formative assessment method in nursing education for acquiring procedural skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Scoping Review was conducted following the PRISMA ScR protocol recommendations. Evidence sources were searched in PubMed, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Scopus from 2012 to 2023. Eligibility criteria were applied, and the methodological quality of the sources was analyzed (MERSQI/AMSTAR). Results were analyzed by three thematic groups, which were consensually agreed upon by the researchers according to the objectives (nursing procedures assessed by DOPS, satisfaction with this educational tool, and acquisition of procedural competence).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 701 articles were identified, of which 13 were selected. The average quality of prospective studies was 10 points (range 5-18). The nursing procedures reviewed included: venipuncture, arterial sampling, therapeutic abdominal paracentesis, bandaging, dressing changes, and endotracheal suctioning. Satisfaction depends on Knowledge about this tool and the resources available at clinical centers. There is a favorable trend towards the acquisition of procedural competencies through formative assessment using DOPS guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOPS guidelines are effective for acquiring procedural skills in nursing. The challenges for successful incorporation of the guidelines are directly related to adequate design, planning, and implementation. There is a notable research gap at the national level regarding the use of these guidelines in nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 11","pages":"1162-1175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Direct Observation of Procedural Skills as an Assessment Tool for Acquiring Procedural Competence in Nursing: A Scoping Review].\",\"authors\":\"Bernardita Osorio, Rodrigo A Sepúlveda, María Elisa Espinoza, Alejandro Delfino\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0034-98872024001101162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) guidelines are designed for the assessment of procedural skills in the workplace and could be a useful tool for evaluating these competencies in nursing education.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the use, facilitating factors, and barriers influencing the implementation of DOPS guidelines as a formative assessment method in nursing education for acquiring procedural skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Scoping Review was conducted following the PRISMA ScR protocol recommendations. Evidence sources were searched in PubMed, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Scopus from 2012 to 2023. Eligibility criteria were applied, and the methodological quality of the sources was analyzed (MERSQI/AMSTAR). Results were analyzed by three thematic groups, which were consensually agreed upon by the researchers according to the objectives (nursing procedures assessed by DOPS, satisfaction with this educational tool, and acquisition of procedural competence).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 701 articles were identified, of which 13 were selected. The average quality of prospective studies was 10 points (range 5-18). The nursing procedures reviewed included: venipuncture, arterial sampling, therapeutic abdominal paracentesis, bandaging, dressing changes, and endotracheal suctioning. Satisfaction depends on Knowledge about this tool and the resources available at clinical centers. There is a favorable trend towards the acquisition of procedural competencies through formative assessment using DOPS guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOPS guidelines are effective for acquiring procedural skills in nursing. The challenges for successful incorporation of the guidelines are directly related to adequate design, planning, and implementation. There is a notable research gap at the national level regarding the use of these guidelines in nursing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":\"152 11\",\"pages\":\"1162-1175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024001101162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024001101162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

DOPS(程序技能直接观察)指南是为评估工作场所的程序技能而设计的,可以成为评估护理教育中这些能力的有用工具。目的:探讨DOPS指南作为一种形成性评估方法在护理学程序技能获取中的应用、促进因素和障碍。方法:根据PRISMA ScR方案建议进行范围审查。从2012年到2023年在PubMed、ProQuest、ScienceDirect和Scopus中检索了证据来源。采用入选标准,并对来源的方法学质量进行分析(MERSQI/AMSTAR)。结果分为三个主题组进行分析,这些主题组是由研究人员根据目标(通过DOPS评估护理程序,对该教育工具的满意度和程序能力的获得)达成一致意见的。结果:共识别701篇文献,入选13篇。前瞻性研究的平均质量为10分(范围5-18)。护理程序包括:静脉穿刺、动脉取样、治疗性腹部穿刺、包扎、换药和气管内吸痰。满意度取决于对该工具的了解和临床中心可用的资源。有一种有利的趋势是,通过使用项目事务处准则的形成性评价来获得程序能力。结论:DOPS指南对获得程序性护理技能是有效的。成功整合指南的挑战与充分的设计、规划和实施直接相关。关于在护理中使用这些指南,在国家一级存在着显著的研究差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Direct Observation of Procedural Skills as an Assessment Tool for Acquiring Procedural Competence in Nursing: A Scoping Review].

The DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) guidelines are designed for the assessment of procedural skills in the workplace and could be a useful tool for evaluating these competencies in nursing education.

Aim: To identify the use, facilitating factors, and barriers influencing the implementation of DOPS guidelines as a formative assessment method in nursing education for acquiring procedural skills.

Methods: A Scoping Review was conducted following the PRISMA ScR protocol recommendations. Evidence sources were searched in PubMed, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, and Scopus from 2012 to 2023. Eligibility criteria were applied, and the methodological quality of the sources was analyzed (MERSQI/AMSTAR). Results were analyzed by three thematic groups, which were consensually agreed upon by the researchers according to the objectives (nursing procedures assessed by DOPS, satisfaction with this educational tool, and acquisition of procedural competence).

Results: A total of 701 articles were identified, of which 13 were selected. The average quality of prospective studies was 10 points (range 5-18). The nursing procedures reviewed included: venipuncture, arterial sampling, therapeutic abdominal paracentesis, bandaging, dressing changes, and endotracheal suctioning. Satisfaction depends on Knowledge about this tool and the resources available at clinical centers. There is a favorable trend towards the acquisition of procedural competencies through formative assessment using DOPS guidelines.

Conclusions: DOPS guidelines are effective for acquiring procedural skills in nursing. The challenges for successful incorporation of the guidelines are directly related to adequate design, planning, and implementation. There is a notable research gap at the national level regarding the use of these guidelines in nursing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信