[生物伦理学工具在重症监护病房的决策]。

Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.4067/s0034-98872024001101154
Claudio Castillo, Manuel Ramírez, Cristian Grenett, Víctor Rossel
{"title":"[生物伦理学工具在重症监护病房的决策]。","authors":"Claudio Castillo, Manuel Ramírez, Cristian Grenett, Víctor Rossel","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024001101154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working in Critical Care Units (CCU) is of a multidisciplinary, high-complexity nature; thus, collegiate decisions are necessary. Bioethics as a discipline in the context of pluralistic, democratic societies provides us with valuable tools for complex clinical cases. In this article, we propose the Principlism tool (Beauchamp & Childress) combined with the Deliberative Method as a major supporting tool for the resolution of these problems at CCU. Additionally, we complement that view with two other tools that consider psychosocial scope: Jonsen, Siegel Winslade, and Diego Gracia Tools. With the help of these tools, it is possible to solve most clinical cases, avoiding extreme courses of action.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 11","pages":"1154-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Bioethics Tools in Decision-Making in the Intensive Care Unit].\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Castillo, Manuel Ramírez, Cristian Grenett, Víctor Rossel\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0034-98872024001101154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Working in Critical Care Units (CCU) is of a multidisciplinary, high-complexity nature; thus, collegiate decisions are necessary. Bioethics as a discipline in the context of pluralistic, democratic societies provides us with valuable tools for complex clinical cases. In this article, we propose the Principlism tool (Beauchamp & Childress) combined with the Deliberative Method as a major supporting tool for the resolution of these problems at CCU. Additionally, we complement that view with two other tools that consider psychosocial scope: Jonsen, Siegel Winslade, and Diego Gracia Tools. With the help of these tools, it is possible to solve most clinical cases, avoiding extreme courses of action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":\"152 11\",\"pages\":\"1154-1161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024001101154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024001101154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在重症监护病房(CCU)工作是一个多学科,高复杂性的性质;因此,集体决策是必要的。生物伦理学作为一门学科,在多元民主社会的背景下,为我们提供了处理复杂临床病例的宝贵工具。在本文中,我们提出原则主义工具(Beauchamp & Childress)结合审议方法作为CCU解决这些问题的主要支持工具。此外,我们用另外两个考虑社会心理范围的工具来补充这一观点:Jonsen, Siegel Winslade和Diego Gracia tools。在这些工具的帮助下,有可能解决大多数临床病例,避免极端的行动方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Bioethics Tools in Decision-Making in the Intensive Care Unit].

Working in Critical Care Units (CCU) is of a multidisciplinary, high-complexity nature; thus, collegiate decisions are necessary. Bioethics as a discipline in the context of pluralistic, democratic societies provides us with valuable tools for complex clinical cases. In this article, we propose the Principlism tool (Beauchamp & Childress) combined with the Deliberative Method as a major supporting tool for the resolution of these problems at CCU. Additionally, we complement that view with two other tools that consider psychosocial scope: Jonsen, Siegel Winslade, and Diego Gracia Tools. With the help of these tools, it is possible to solve most clinical cases, avoiding extreme courses of action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信