{"title":"回复:评论:常见痴呆综合征的神经精神表现:初级保健团队成员的简明回顾。","authors":"Zoe Bell, Maureen K. O'Connor, Lauren R. Moo","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Strijkert et al. [<span>1</span>]'s response to our article “Neuropsychiatric presentations of common dementia syndromes: A concise review for primary care team members” [<span>2</span>] describing the neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) of common dementia syndromes, they point out that impairment in social cognition may explain many of the symptoms associated with mild behavioral impairment (MBI). Therefore, they advocate for assessing for changes in social cognition during dementia screenings in primary care. We agree that social cognition is an important facet of NPS in emerging dementia syndromes and therefore should be evaluated. However, as the authors point out, social cognition cannot be fully assessed during a routine primary care visit.</p><p>In our article, we suggest the use of questionnaires such as the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C) and the Neuropsychiatric Symptom Inventory (NSI) to assess for behavioral impairment. In Strijkert et al. [<span>1</span>]'s reply, they point out that these measures rely on subjective sources of information and omit certain aspects of social cognition. Other questionnaires have similar shortcomings [<span>3, 4</span>]. We acknowledge the limitations of these questionnaires and time burden of administering such questionnaires in a primary care setting. In their reply, the authors suggest that well-validated objective neuropsychological measures be used to assess different aspects of social cognition, and we agree. However, as we have noted previously, referral to specialty care, including neuropsychology, though ideal, is not always possible [<span>2, 5</span>]. We are not aware of a standardized way to assess for changes in social cognition in a generalist setting. In the service of providing guidance to individuals in a primary care setting, as was the focus of our original article, we suggest that when there is concern for changes in cognitive, behavioral, or psychiatric functioning in adults age 50+, primary care team members ask broad, open-ended questions that may be sensitive to changes in social cognition. A simple inquiry into the patient's social relationships (e.g., “Have you noticed any changes in your relationships?”) may help to elucidate emerging impairments in social cognition by revealing recent relational tension or discord, as impaired social cognition is expected to negatively affect interpersonal dynamics [<span>6</span>]. A query regarding changes in sexual behavior/sexual health may also be telling, as changes in sexual behavior are often associated with changes in social cognition [<span>7, 8</span>]. If the response to these screening questions conveys a possible decline in social cognition, this becomes another data point that the primary care team member can use to determine whether further evaluation by specialty care is warranted.</p><p>In short, we agree that changes in social cognition should be added to the list of NPS that can accompany or predate dementia. However, detailed or standardized assessment is typically not possible within the primary care setting [<span>5</span>]. Primary care team members may be able to expose changes in social cognition through broad screening questions related to social functioning within close relationships.</p><p>Zoe Bell wrote the first and all subsequent drafts of this reply. Maureen K. O'Connor and Lauren R. Moo reviewed and provided feedback on all drafts. All authors take full responsibility for the content of the manuscript and satisfy the requirements for authorship.</p><p>The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the U.S. government, or the authors' respective institutions.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>This publication is linked to a related comment by Strijkert et al. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19412.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 6","pages":"1966-1967"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19413","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reply to: Comment on: Neuropsychiatric Presentations of Common Dementia Syndromes: A Concise Review for Primary Care Team Members\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Bell, Maureen K. O'Connor, Lauren R. Moo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In Strijkert et al. [<span>1</span>]'s response to our article “Neuropsychiatric presentations of common dementia syndromes: A concise review for primary care team members” [<span>2</span>] describing the neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) of common dementia syndromes, they point out that impairment in social cognition may explain many of the symptoms associated with mild behavioral impairment (MBI). Therefore, they advocate for assessing for changes in social cognition during dementia screenings in primary care. We agree that social cognition is an important facet of NPS in emerging dementia syndromes and therefore should be evaluated. However, as the authors point out, social cognition cannot be fully assessed during a routine primary care visit.</p><p>In our article, we suggest the use of questionnaires such as the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C) and the Neuropsychiatric Symptom Inventory (NSI) to assess for behavioral impairment. In Strijkert et al. [<span>1</span>]'s reply, they point out that these measures rely on subjective sources of information and omit certain aspects of social cognition. Other questionnaires have similar shortcomings [<span>3, 4</span>]. We acknowledge the limitations of these questionnaires and time burden of administering such questionnaires in a primary care setting. In their reply, the authors suggest that well-validated objective neuropsychological measures be used to assess different aspects of social cognition, and we agree. However, as we have noted previously, referral to specialty care, including neuropsychology, though ideal, is not always possible [<span>2, 5</span>]. We are not aware of a standardized way to assess for changes in social cognition in a generalist setting. In the service of providing guidance to individuals in a primary care setting, as was the focus of our original article, we suggest that when there is concern for changes in cognitive, behavioral, or psychiatric functioning in adults age 50+, primary care team members ask broad, open-ended questions that may be sensitive to changes in social cognition. A simple inquiry into the patient's social relationships (e.g., “Have you noticed any changes in your relationships?”) may help to elucidate emerging impairments in social cognition by revealing recent relational tension or discord, as impaired social cognition is expected to negatively affect interpersonal dynamics [<span>6</span>]. A query regarding changes in sexual behavior/sexual health may also be telling, as changes in sexual behavior are often associated with changes in social cognition [<span>7, 8</span>]. If the response to these screening questions conveys a possible decline in social cognition, this becomes another data point that the primary care team member can use to determine whether further evaluation by specialty care is warranted.</p><p>In short, we agree that changes in social cognition should be added to the list of NPS that can accompany or predate dementia. However, detailed or standardized assessment is typically not possible within the primary care setting [<span>5</span>]. Primary care team members may be able to expose changes in social cognition through broad screening questions related to social functioning within close relationships.</p><p>Zoe Bell wrote the first and all subsequent drafts of this reply. Maureen K. O'Connor and Lauren R. Moo reviewed and provided feedback on all drafts. All authors take full responsibility for the content of the manuscript and satisfy the requirements for authorship.</p><p>The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the U.S. government, or the authors' respective institutions.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>This publication is linked to a related comment by Strijkert et al. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19412.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"73 6\",\"pages\":\"1966-1967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19413\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19413\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在Strijkert et al.[1]对我们的文章《常见痴呆综合征的神经精神表现:初级保健团队成员的简明回顾》的回应中,他们描述了常见痴呆综合征的神经精神症状(NPS),他们指出社会认知障碍可以解释许多与轻度行为障碍(MBI)相关的症状。因此,他们主张在初级保健中评估痴呆筛查期间社会认知的变化。我们同意社会认知是新发痴呆综合征中NPS的一个重要方面,因此应该进行评估。然而,正如作者指出的那样,社会认知不能在常规的初级保健访问中得到充分评估。在我们的文章中,我们建议使用问卷调查,如轻度行为障碍检查表(MBI-C)和神经精神症状量表(NSI)来评估行为障碍。在Strijkert等人的回复中,他们指出这些措施依赖于主观的信息来源,忽略了社会认知的某些方面。其他问卷也有类似的不足[3,4]。我们承认这些问卷的局限性和在初级保健环境中管理这些问卷的时间负担。在他们的回复中,作者建议使用经过验证的客观神经心理学测量来评估社会认知的不同方面,我们同意。然而,正如我们之前提到的,转诊到专业护理,包括神经心理学,虽然理想,但并不总是可能的[2,5]。我们还没有找到一种标准化的方法来评估通才环境下社会认知的变化。在为初级保健环境中的个体提供指导的服务中,正如我们最初文章的重点一样,我们建议,当关注50岁以上成年人的认知、行为或精神功能的变化时,初级保健团队成员询问广泛的、开放式的问题,这些问题可能对社会认知的变化敏感。对患者社会关系的简单询问(例如,“你注意到你的关系有任何变化吗?”)可能有助于通过揭示最近的关系紧张或不和谐来阐明新出现的社会认知障碍,因为受损的社会认知预计会对人际动态产生负面影响[10]。关于性行为/性健康变化的问题也可以说明问题,因为性行为的变化通常与社会认知的变化有关[7,8]。如果对这些筛查问题的回答表明社会认知能力可能下降,这就成为了另一个数据点,初级保健团队成员可以使用它来确定是否有必要进行进一步的专科护理评估。简而言之,我们同意社会认知的变化应该被添加到可以伴随或先于痴呆的NPS列表中。然而,在初级保健环境中,通常不可能进行详细或标准化的评估。初级保健团队成员可以通过与亲密关系中的社会功能相关的广泛筛选问题来揭示社会认知的变化。佐伊·贝尔(Zoe Bell)撰写了这篇回复的第一稿和所有后续草稿。Maureen K. O'Connor和Lauren R. Moo审阅了所有的草稿并提供了反馈。所有作者对稿件内容承担全部责任,并满足作者身份要求。内容完全是作者的责任,并不一定代表退伍军人事务部,美国政府或作者各自机构的官方观点。作者声明无利益冲突。本出版物链接到Strijkert等人的相关评论。要查看本文,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19412。
Reply to: Comment on: Neuropsychiatric Presentations of Common Dementia Syndromes: A Concise Review for Primary Care Team Members
In Strijkert et al. [1]'s response to our article “Neuropsychiatric presentations of common dementia syndromes: A concise review for primary care team members” [2] describing the neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) of common dementia syndromes, they point out that impairment in social cognition may explain many of the symptoms associated with mild behavioral impairment (MBI). Therefore, they advocate for assessing for changes in social cognition during dementia screenings in primary care. We agree that social cognition is an important facet of NPS in emerging dementia syndromes and therefore should be evaluated. However, as the authors point out, social cognition cannot be fully assessed during a routine primary care visit.
In our article, we suggest the use of questionnaires such as the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C) and the Neuropsychiatric Symptom Inventory (NSI) to assess for behavioral impairment. In Strijkert et al. [1]'s reply, they point out that these measures rely on subjective sources of information and omit certain aspects of social cognition. Other questionnaires have similar shortcomings [3, 4]. We acknowledge the limitations of these questionnaires and time burden of administering such questionnaires in a primary care setting. In their reply, the authors suggest that well-validated objective neuropsychological measures be used to assess different aspects of social cognition, and we agree. However, as we have noted previously, referral to specialty care, including neuropsychology, though ideal, is not always possible [2, 5]. We are not aware of a standardized way to assess for changes in social cognition in a generalist setting. In the service of providing guidance to individuals in a primary care setting, as was the focus of our original article, we suggest that when there is concern for changes in cognitive, behavioral, or psychiatric functioning in adults age 50+, primary care team members ask broad, open-ended questions that may be sensitive to changes in social cognition. A simple inquiry into the patient's social relationships (e.g., “Have you noticed any changes in your relationships?”) may help to elucidate emerging impairments in social cognition by revealing recent relational tension or discord, as impaired social cognition is expected to negatively affect interpersonal dynamics [6]. A query regarding changes in sexual behavior/sexual health may also be telling, as changes in sexual behavior are often associated with changes in social cognition [7, 8]. If the response to these screening questions conveys a possible decline in social cognition, this becomes another data point that the primary care team member can use to determine whether further evaluation by specialty care is warranted.
In short, we agree that changes in social cognition should be added to the list of NPS that can accompany or predate dementia. However, detailed or standardized assessment is typically not possible within the primary care setting [5]. Primary care team members may be able to expose changes in social cognition through broad screening questions related to social functioning within close relationships.
Zoe Bell wrote the first and all subsequent drafts of this reply. Maureen K. O'Connor and Lauren R. Moo reviewed and provided feedback on all drafts. All authors take full responsibility for the content of the manuscript and satisfy the requirements for authorship.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the U.S. government, or the authors' respective institutions.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This publication is linked to a related comment by Strijkert et al. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19412.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.