心理健康消费者和初级保健提供者共同设计改进和创新:范围审查。

Kathryn Thorburn, Bani Aadam, Shifra Waks, Brett Bellingham, Mark F Harris, Karen R Fisher, Catherine Spooner
{"title":"心理健康消费者和初级保健提供者共同设计改进和创新:范围审查。","authors":"Kathryn Thorburn, Bani Aadam, Shifra Waks, Brett Bellingham, Mark F Harris, Karen R Fisher, Catherine Spooner","doi":"10.1071/PY24104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Co-design and co-production are increasingly used to improve and innovate healthcare practices and services to better address people's healthcare needs. Mental health consumers, especially people diagnosed with serious mental illness, experience considerable health disparities and barriers to primary care, while primary care providers experience barriers to addressing the healthcare needs of people diagnosed with serious mental illness. Both mental health consumers and primary care providers bring knowledge and expertise to improving mental health consumers' health care. This scoping review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature was undertaken to determine the extent and scope of co-design and co-production involving mental health consumers and primary care providers to address mental health consumers' healthcare needs. The review also sought to determine factors that enable or limit co-design and co-production involving mental health consumers and primary care providers. Twelve studies and reports of co-design and co-production involving mental health consumers and primary care providers were identified by the review. These studies showed that co-design and co-production were feasible and beneficial, and that there was significant scope for collaboration at the intersection of mental health and primary care services. Lessons learned from projects that have led the way include the need for (1) co-design/co-production practices that sustain equitable participation and address inevitable power imbalances when service users and service providers work together, (2) sufficient reporting on methods to ascertain claims of co-design/co-production and allow replication of these methods in similar healthcare improvement projects, and (3) co-design/co-production projects to be supported by other systems change strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health consumers and primary care providers co-designing improvements and innovations: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Thorburn, Bani Aadam, Shifra Waks, Brett Bellingham, Mark F Harris, Karen R Fisher, Catherine Spooner\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PY24104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Co-design and co-production are increasingly used to improve and innovate healthcare practices and services to better address people's healthcare needs. Mental health consumers, especially people diagnosed with serious mental illness, experience considerable health disparities and barriers to primary care, while primary care providers experience barriers to addressing the healthcare needs of people diagnosed with serious mental illness. Both mental health consumers and primary care providers bring knowledge and expertise to improving mental health consumers' health care. This scoping review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature was undertaken to determine the extent and scope of co-design and co-production involving mental health consumers and primary care providers to address mental health consumers' healthcare needs. The review also sought to determine factors that enable or limit co-design and co-production involving mental health consumers and primary care providers. Twelve studies and reports of co-design and co-production involving mental health consumers and primary care providers were identified by the review. These studies showed that co-design and co-production were feasible and beneficial, and that there was significant scope for collaboration at the intersection of mental health and primary care services. Lessons learned from projects that have led the way include the need for (1) co-design/co-production practices that sustain equitable participation and address inevitable power imbalances when service users and service providers work together, (2) sufficient reporting on methods to ascertain claims of co-design/co-production and allow replication of these methods in similar healthcare improvement projects, and (3) co-design/co-production projects to be supported by other systems change strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共同设计和共同生产越来越多地用于改进和创新医疗保健实践和服务,以更好地满足人们的医疗保健需求。心理健康消费者,特别是被诊断患有严重精神疾病的人,在获得初级保健方面存在相当大的健康差距和障碍,而初级保健提供者在满足被诊断患有严重精神疾病的人的保健需求方面也存在障碍。心理健康消费者和初级保健提供者都为改善心理健康消费者的卫生保健提供知识和专业知识。对同行评议文献和灰色文献进行了范围审查,以确定涉及精神卫生消费者和初级保健提供者的共同设计和共同制作的程度和范围,以解决精神卫生消费者的卫生保健需求。本综述还试图确定促使或限制涉及精神卫生消费者和初级保健提供者的共同设计和共同生产的因素。本综述确定了涉及心理健康消费者和初级保健提供者的共同设计和共同制作的12项研究和报告。这些研究表明,共同设计和共同制作是可行和有益的,并且在精神卫生和初级保健服务的交叉点有很大的合作空间。从领先的项目中吸取的经验教训包括:需要(1)共同设计/共同生产实践,以维持公平参与,解决服务用户和服务提供者在合作时不可避免的权力不平衡问题;(2)充分报告确定共同设计/共同生产要求的方法,并允许在类似的医疗保健改善项目中复制这些方法;(3)协同设计/协同生产项目将得到其他系统变更策略的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mental health consumers and primary care providers co-designing improvements and innovations: a scoping review.

Co-design and co-production are increasingly used to improve and innovate healthcare practices and services to better address people's healthcare needs. Mental health consumers, especially people diagnosed with serious mental illness, experience considerable health disparities and barriers to primary care, while primary care providers experience barriers to addressing the healthcare needs of people diagnosed with serious mental illness. Both mental health consumers and primary care providers bring knowledge and expertise to improving mental health consumers' health care. This scoping review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature was undertaken to determine the extent and scope of co-design and co-production involving mental health consumers and primary care providers to address mental health consumers' healthcare needs. The review also sought to determine factors that enable or limit co-design and co-production involving mental health consumers and primary care providers. Twelve studies and reports of co-design and co-production involving mental health consumers and primary care providers were identified by the review. These studies showed that co-design and co-production were feasible and beneficial, and that there was significant scope for collaboration at the intersection of mental health and primary care services. Lessons learned from projects that have led the way include the need for (1) co-design/co-production practices that sustain equitable participation and address inevitable power imbalances when service users and service providers work together, (2) sufficient reporting on methods to ascertain claims of co-design/co-production and allow replication of these methods in similar healthcare improvement projects, and (3) co-design/co-production projects to be supported by other systems change strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信