艾伯塔省与安大略省长期护理居民临终药物处方率的差异——一项回顾性队列研究

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Jessica E Simon, Asmita Bhattarai, Zhi-Yun Apoint-Hao, Rhiannon L Roberts, Christina Milani, Colleen Webber, Vivian Ewa, Anna E Clarke, Sarina R Isenberg, Daniel Kobewka, Danial Qureshi, Shirley H Bush, Kaitlyn Boese, Amit Arya, Benoit Robert, James Downar, Peter Tanuseputro, Aynharan Sinnarajah
{"title":"艾伯塔省与安大略省长期护理居民临终药物处方率的差异——一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jessica E Simon, Asmita Bhattarai, Zhi-Yun Apoint-Hao, Rhiannon L Roberts, Christina Milani, Colleen Webber, Vivian Ewa, Anna E Clarke, Sarina R Isenberg, Daniel Kobewka, Danial Qureshi, Shirley H Bush, Kaitlyn Boese, Amit Arya, Benoit Robert, James Downar, Peter Tanuseputro, Aynharan Sinnarajah","doi":"10.5770/cgj.28.811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescribing rates for subcutaneous medications may be an indicator of quality of end-of-life care in long-term care (LTC). It is not known if this system level measure is valid across jurisdictions. We compared prescribing rates of medications used for end-of-life symptom relief among LTC residents in Alberta and Ontario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of LTC residents compared those who died between January 1, 2017, and March 17, 2020 in Alberta, with a published cohort from Ontario. Prescribed end-of-life medications during a resident's last 14 days of life were extracted from administrative dispensation records. LTC homes were ranked into quintiles based on prescribing rates within each home, and the home characteristics were described. The proportion of residents who transferred out of LTC in the last 14 days of life was also determined, as another quality measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 10,038 decedents in 117 LTC homes. Among LTC decedents, 16.9% were prescribed ≥1 injectable end-of-life medication and 44.9% were prescribed at least one end-of-life medication by any route of administration, within the last 14 days of life. Across prescribing quintiles, there were no associations with transfer rates prior to death. Comparing Alberta to Ontario, there were markedly lower rates of injectable medicine prescribing (16.9% vs. 64.7%). Potential reasons and data limitations were explored.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rates of injectable end-of life medication prescribing differed across Alberta LTC homes; however, current provincial data limitations impact the validity of using these rates as a comparative indicator of the quality of end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"31-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in Prescribing Rates of End-of-Life Medications Among Long-Term Care Residents in Alberta Compared with Ontario-a Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica E Simon, Asmita Bhattarai, Zhi-Yun Apoint-Hao, Rhiannon L Roberts, Christina Milani, Colleen Webber, Vivian Ewa, Anna E Clarke, Sarina R Isenberg, Daniel Kobewka, Danial Qureshi, Shirley H Bush, Kaitlyn Boese, Amit Arya, Benoit Robert, James Downar, Peter Tanuseputro, Aynharan Sinnarajah\",\"doi\":\"10.5770/cgj.28.811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescribing rates for subcutaneous medications may be an indicator of quality of end-of-life care in long-term care (LTC). It is not known if this system level measure is valid across jurisdictions. We compared prescribing rates of medications used for end-of-life symptom relief among LTC residents in Alberta and Ontario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study of LTC residents compared those who died between January 1, 2017, and March 17, 2020 in Alberta, with a published cohort from Ontario. Prescribed end-of-life medications during a resident's last 14 days of life were extracted from administrative dispensation records. LTC homes were ranked into quintiles based on prescribing rates within each home, and the home characteristics were described. The proportion of residents who transferred out of LTC in the last 14 days of life was also determined, as another quality measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 10,038 decedents in 117 LTC homes. Among LTC decedents, 16.9% were prescribed ≥1 injectable end-of-life medication and 44.9% were prescribed at least one end-of-life medication by any route of administration, within the last 14 days of life. Across prescribing quintiles, there were no associations with transfer rates prior to death. Comparing Alberta to Ontario, there were markedly lower rates of injectable medicine prescribing (16.9% vs. 64.7%). Potential reasons and data limitations were explored.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rates of injectable end-of life medication prescribing differed across Alberta LTC homes; however, current provincial data limitations impact the validity of using these rates as a comparative indicator of the quality of end-of-life care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"31-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882209/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.28.811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.28.811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:皮下药物的处方率可能是长期护理(LTC)生命末期护理质量的一个指标。目前尚不清楚这种系统级别的措施是否在各个司法管辖区都有效。我们比较了阿尔伯塔省和安大略省LTC居民用于临终症状缓解的药物处方率。方法:这项对阿尔伯塔省2017年1月1日至2020年3月17日期间死亡的LTC居民的回顾性队列研究与安大略省已发表的队列进行了比较。在居民生命的最后14天内,从行政分配记录中提取处方临终药物。根据每个家庭的处方率将LTC家庭分为五分位数,并描述了家庭特征。作为另一项质量指标,还确定了在生命的最后14天内转移出LTC的居民比例。结果:我们在117个LTC家庭中确定了10,038名死者。在LTC患者中,16.9%的患者在生命的最后14天内使用了≥1种可注射的临终药物,44.9%的患者在任何给药途径下使用了至少一种临终药物。在整个处方五分位数中,与死亡前的转移率没有关联。与安大略省相比,阿尔伯塔省的注射药物处方率明显较低(16.9%对64.7%)。探讨了可能的原因和数据局限性。结论:阿尔伯塔省LTC家庭的注射临终药物处方率存在差异;然而,目前的省级数据限制影响了使用这些比率作为临终关怀质量的比较指标的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variations in Prescribing Rates of End-of-Life Medications Among Long-Term Care Residents in Alberta Compared with Ontario-a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Prescribing rates for subcutaneous medications may be an indicator of quality of end-of-life care in long-term care (LTC). It is not known if this system level measure is valid across jurisdictions. We compared prescribing rates of medications used for end-of-life symptom relief among LTC residents in Alberta and Ontario.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study of LTC residents compared those who died between January 1, 2017, and March 17, 2020 in Alberta, with a published cohort from Ontario. Prescribed end-of-life medications during a resident's last 14 days of life were extracted from administrative dispensation records. LTC homes were ranked into quintiles based on prescribing rates within each home, and the home characteristics were described. The proportion of residents who transferred out of LTC in the last 14 days of life was also determined, as another quality measure.

Results: We identified 10,038 decedents in 117 LTC homes. Among LTC decedents, 16.9% were prescribed ≥1 injectable end-of-life medication and 44.9% were prescribed at least one end-of-life medication by any route of administration, within the last 14 days of life. Across prescribing quintiles, there were no associations with transfer rates prior to death. Comparing Alberta to Ontario, there were markedly lower rates of injectable medicine prescribing (16.9% vs. 64.7%). Potential reasons and data limitations were explored.

Conclusions: Rates of injectable end-of life medication prescribing differed across Alberta LTC homes; however, current provincial data limitations impact the validity of using these rates as a comparative indicator of the quality of end-of-life care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信