了解迷幻辅助心理疗法提供者的观点和见解:定性分析。

Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2024-09-04 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1089/psymed.2023.0074
Crystal Lederhos Smith, Nathan Sackett, Brian Connor Stark, Victoria Dinh, Ellen Wager Romesburg, John Roll
{"title":"了解迷幻辅助心理疗法提供者的观点和见解:定性分析。","authors":"Crystal Lederhos Smith, Nathan Sackett, Brian Connor Stark, Victoria Dinh, Ellen Wager Romesburg, John Roll","doi":"10.1089/psymed.2023.0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is increasing interest in the use of psychedelics for therapeutic and recreational use. Research has been hindered by federal prohibition, put in place in 1970. Despite the regulatory difficulty, research has rapidly expanded in the past decade. Multiple states and cities have drafted their own policies regarding the use of psychedelics. Assuming interest in psychedelics continues to expand; every opportunity should be explored to better understand how psychedelics may be helping or harming people.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined underground psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy providers' protocols and perspectives, to better inform policy and public health, as psychedelics increasingly are used in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transcripts of interviews were examined through qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following four themes were identified: (1) personal experiences and self-healing motivated sharing and promotion of the positive effects of psychedelics as an expression of altruism, (2) guides articulated consistent, yet flexible processes, (3) guides believed that the client benefit was actualized through their own intrinsic ability to heal themselves, and (4) guides expressed an overwhelming sense of dissonance regarding psychedelic legalization, not only desiring increased access and decreased risk but also expressing concern about potential negative impacts on provider flexibility, and depersonalization that could come with standardizing this field of practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In order for current research and policy to be best informed, information must be gathered from both clinical trials and observational studies of current practice. This study identified themes within the latter to provide perspectives, practices, and insights of current underground practice, so it can be used to inform research and policy moving forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":74590,"journal":{"name":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"2 3","pages":"153-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy Providers' Perspective and Insights: A Qualitative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Crystal Lederhos Smith, Nathan Sackett, Brian Connor Stark, Victoria Dinh, Ellen Wager Romesburg, John Roll\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/psymed.2023.0074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is increasing interest in the use of psychedelics for therapeutic and recreational use. Research has been hindered by federal prohibition, put in place in 1970. Despite the regulatory difficulty, research has rapidly expanded in the past decade. Multiple states and cities have drafted their own policies regarding the use of psychedelics. Assuming interest in psychedelics continues to expand; every opportunity should be explored to better understand how psychedelics may be helping or harming people.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined underground psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy providers' protocols and perspectives, to better inform policy and public health, as psychedelics increasingly are used in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transcripts of interviews were examined through qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following four themes were identified: (1) personal experiences and self-healing motivated sharing and promotion of the positive effects of psychedelics as an expression of altruism, (2) guides articulated consistent, yet flexible processes, (3) guides believed that the client benefit was actualized through their own intrinsic ability to heal themselves, and (4) guides expressed an overwhelming sense of dissonance regarding psychedelic legalization, not only desiring increased access and decreased risk but also expressing concern about potential negative impacts on provider flexibility, and depersonalization that could come with standardizing this field of practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In order for current research and policy to be best informed, information must be gathered from both clinical trials and observational studies of current practice. This study identified themes within the latter to provide perspectives, practices, and insights of current underground practice, so it can be used to inform research and policy moving forward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"153-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/psymed.2023.0074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/psymed.2023.0074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人们对迷幻药的治疗和娱乐用途越来越感兴趣。研究一直受到1970年颁布的联邦禁令的阻碍。尽管存在监管上的困难,但在过去的十年里,研究已经迅速扩大。许多州和城市已经起草了他们自己的关于使用迷幻药的政策。假设对迷幻药的兴趣继续扩大;应该探索每一个机会,以更好地了解迷幻药是如何帮助或伤害人们的。目的:本研究考察了地下致幻剂辅助心理治疗提供者的方案和观点,以更好地为政策和公共卫生提供信息,因为致幻剂在美国的使用越来越多。方法:采用定性内容分析对访谈笔录进行检验。结果:确定了以下四个主题:(1)个人经历和自我修复激励分享和促进迷幻药的积极作用,作为利他主义的一种表达;(2)指南阐述了一致而灵活的过程;(3)指南相信客户的利益是通过他们自己内在的自我治愈能力实现的;(4)指南表达了对迷幻药合法化的压倒性的不和谐感。不仅希望增加访问和降低风险,而且还表达了对提供者灵活性的潜在负面影响的担忧,以及标准化这一领域的实践可能带来的非个性化。结论:为了使当前的研究和政策获得最好的信息,必须从临床试验和当前实践的观察性研究中收集信息。本研究确定了后者的主题,以提供当前地下实践的观点、实践和见解,因此它可以用于为研究和政策的推进提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy Providers' Perspective and Insights: A Qualitative Analysis.

Background: There is increasing interest in the use of psychedelics for therapeutic and recreational use. Research has been hindered by federal prohibition, put in place in 1970. Despite the regulatory difficulty, research has rapidly expanded in the past decade. Multiple states and cities have drafted their own policies regarding the use of psychedelics. Assuming interest in psychedelics continues to expand; every opportunity should be explored to better understand how psychedelics may be helping or harming people.

Objective: This study examined underground psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy providers' protocols and perspectives, to better inform policy and public health, as psychedelics increasingly are used in the United States.

Methods: Transcripts of interviews were examined through qualitative content analysis.

Results: The following four themes were identified: (1) personal experiences and self-healing motivated sharing and promotion of the positive effects of psychedelics as an expression of altruism, (2) guides articulated consistent, yet flexible processes, (3) guides believed that the client benefit was actualized through their own intrinsic ability to heal themselves, and (4) guides expressed an overwhelming sense of dissonance regarding psychedelic legalization, not only desiring increased access and decreased risk but also expressing concern about potential negative impacts on provider flexibility, and depersonalization that could come with standardizing this field of practice.

Conclusion: In order for current research and policy to be best informed, information must be gathered from both clinical trials and observational studies of current practice. This study identified themes within the latter to provide perspectives, practices, and insights of current underground practice, so it can be used to inform research and policy moving forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信