与大流行前相比,COVID-19 大流行后全科医生的工作情况:对德国全科医生和医务助理进行纵向问卷调查,了解大流行对日常护理工作的影响。

IF 1.7 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Lisa Kümpel , Doreen Kuschick , Kahina Toutaoui , Marius Dierks , Florian Wolf , Liliana Rost , Christoph Heintze , Susanne Döpfmer
{"title":"与大流行前相比,COVID-19 大流行后全科医生的工作情况:对德国全科医生和医务助理进行纵向问卷调查,了解大流行对日常护理工作的影响。","authors":"Lisa Kümpel ,&nbsp;Doreen Kuschick ,&nbsp;Kahina Toutaoui ,&nbsp;Marius Dierks ,&nbsp;Florian Wolf ,&nbsp;Liliana Rost ,&nbsp;Christoph Heintze ,&nbsp;Susanne Döpfmer","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, general practice teams faced numerous challenges. The aim of the VeCo practice project was to explore changes in the provision and utilisation of health care services in general practices as well as professional challenges and needs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) and medical practice assistants (MPAs). This article focusses on the follow-up survey of the two groups, administered shortly after the pandemic, to explore whether and which of the perceived changes persisted post-pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We administered a longitudinal, self-developed, paper-based survey to GPs and MPAs in three German federal states during the pandemic in April 2022 (baseline) and shortly after the pandemic in May 2023 (follow-up). The results were analysed descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 657 GPs and 762 MPAs participated in the baseline survey, and some 327 GPs and 369 MPAs took part in the follow-up survey. The results indicate that GPs and MPAs have perceived an increased frequency of scheduled visits and routine examinations since 2023. In contrast, during the pandemic, these services were offered at a considerably lower rate compared to pre-pandemic times. Compared to the data obtained from the baseline survey, the follow-up data indicates that both GPs and MPAs felt more satisfied with their work again, but still felt overburdened. Both professional groups continue to regard better remuneration, appreciation and more involvement in health policy decisions as the most important requirements. Additionally, our findings suggest that telephone sick notes, a separate service of infectious diseases consultation and mandatory face mask use for infectious patients should be maintained post-pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to numerous changes in GP care, some of which may have an impact beyond the pandemic. Shortly after the end of the pandemic, the changes in the supply and utilisation of GP services had not yet returned to pre-pandemic levels. This applied, for example, to aspects of the organisation of consultation hours, where sustainable changes and improvements have been made. Even after the end of the pandemic, GPs and MPAs are still calling for appropriate remuneration, better appreciation and less bureaucracy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Reflecting on the changes in GP practices during and after the pandemic could provide important information about lessons learned, potentially useful adjustments and opportunities for improvements to daily practice as well as highlighting the importance of work satisfaction of GPs and MPAs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"195 ","pages":"Pages 51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic in general practices compared to pre-pandemic times: Longitudinal questionnaire survey among general practitioners and medical practice assistants in Germany on how the pandemic shaped everyday care\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Kümpel ,&nbsp;Doreen Kuschick ,&nbsp;Kahina Toutaoui ,&nbsp;Marius Dierks ,&nbsp;Florian Wolf ,&nbsp;Liliana Rost ,&nbsp;Christoph Heintze ,&nbsp;Susanne Döpfmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, general practice teams faced numerous challenges. The aim of the VeCo practice project was to explore changes in the provision and utilisation of health care services in general practices as well as professional challenges and needs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) and medical practice assistants (MPAs). This article focusses on the follow-up survey of the two groups, administered shortly after the pandemic, to explore whether and which of the perceived changes persisted post-pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We administered a longitudinal, self-developed, paper-based survey to GPs and MPAs in three German federal states during the pandemic in April 2022 (baseline) and shortly after the pandemic in May 2023 (follow-up). The results were analysed descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 657 GPs and 762 MPAs participated in the baseline survey, and some 327 GPs and 369 MPAs took part in the follow-up survey. The results indicate that GPs and MPAs have perceived an increased frequency of scheduled visits and routine examinations since 2023. In contrast, during the pandemic, these services were offered at a considerably lower rate compared to pre-pandemic times. Compared to the data obtained from the baseline survey, the follow-up data indicates that both GPs and MPAs felt more satisfied with their work again, but still felt overburdened. Both professional groups continue to regard better remuneration, appreciation and more involvement in health policy decisions as the most important requirements. Additionally, our findings suggest that telephone sick notes, a separate service of infectious diseases consultation and mandatory face mask use for infectious patients should be maintained post-pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to numerous changes in GP care, some of which may have an impact beyond the pandemic. Shortly after the end of the pandemic, the changes in the supply and utilisation of GP services had not yet returned to pre-pandemic levels. This applied, for example, to aspects of the organisation of consultation hours, where sustainable changes and improvements have been made. Even after the end of the pandemic, GPs and MPAs are still calling for appropriate remuneration, better appreciation and less bureaucracy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Reflecting on the changes in GP practices during and after the pandemic could provide important information about lessons learned, potentially useful adjustments and opportunities for improvements to daily practice as well as highlighting the importance of work satisfaction of GPs and MPAs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921725000510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921725000510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,全科医生团队面临着众多挑战。VeCo实践项目的目的是从全科医生(gp)和医疗实践助理(mpa)的角度探讨在COVID-19大流行期间和之后,全科医生提供和利用卫生保健服务的变化以及专业挑战和需求。本文重点关注在大流行后不久对这两组进行的后续调查,以探讨所感知到的变化是否以及哪些变化在大流行后持续存在。方法:我们在2022年4月大流行期间(基线)和2023年5月大流行后不久(随访)对德国三个联邦州的gp和mpa进行了一项纵向、自主开发的纸质调查。对结果进行描述性分析。结果:共有657名全科医生和762名海洋保护区参与了基线调查,327名全科医生和369名海洋保护区参与了后续调查。结果表明,自2023年以来,全科医生和海洋保护区的定期就诊和例行检查频率有所增加。相比之下,在大流行期间,提供这些服务的费率比大流行前低得多。与基线调查获得的数据相比,后续数据表明,全科医生和海洋保护区对他们的工作再次感到更满意,但仍然感到负担过重。这两个专业团体继续把提高薪酬、赞赏和更多地参与保健政策决定视为最重要的要求。此外,我们的研究结果表明,大流行后应保持电话病假条、单独的传染病咨询服务和强制传染病患者使用口罩。讨论:2019冠状病毒病大流行导致全科医生护理发生了许多变化,其中一些变化可能会产生大流行之外的影响。大流行结束后不久,全科医生服务的供应和利用方面的变化尚未恢复到大流行前的水平。例如,这适用于组织咨询时间的各个方面,在这些方面已经做出了可持续的变化和改进。即使在大流行结束后,全科医生和海洋保护区仍在呼吁适当的薪酬,更好的赞赏和减少官僚主义。结论:反思大流行期间和之后全科医生实践的变化可以提供有关经验教训的重要信息,可能有用的调整和改进日常实践的机会,并突出全科医生和mpa工作满意度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic in general practices compared to pre-pandemic times: Longitudinal questionnaire survey among general practitioners and medical practice assistants in Germany on how the pandemic shaped everyday care

Introduction

During the COVID-19 pandemic, general practice teams faced numerous challenges. The aim of the VeCo practice project was to explore changes in the provision and utilisation of health care services in general practices as well as professional challenges and needs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs) and medical practice assistants (MPAs). This article focusses on the follow-up survey of the two groups, administered shortly after the pandemic, to explore whether and which of the perceived changes persisted post-pandemic.

Methods

We administered a longitudinal, self-developed, paper-based survey to GPs and MPAs in three German federal states during the pandemic in April 2022 (baseline) and shortly after the pandemic in May 2023 (follow-up). The results were analysed descriptively.

Results

A total of 657 GPs and 762 MPAs participated in the baseline survey, and some 327 GPs and 369 MPAs took part in the follow-up survey. The results indicate that GPs and MPAs have perceived an increased frequency of scheduled visits and routine examinations since 2023. In contrast, during the pandemic, these services were offered at a considerably lower rate compared to pre-pandemic times. Compared to the data obtained from the baseline survey, the follow-up data indicates that both GPs and MPAs felt more satisfied with their work again, but still felt overburdened. Both professional groups continue to regard better remuneration, appreciation and more involvement in health policy decisions as the most important requirements. Additionally, our findings suggest that telephone sick notes, a separate service of infectious diseases consultation and mandatory face mask use for infectious patients should be maintained post-pandemic.

Discussion

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to numerous changes in GP care, some of which may have an impact beyond the pandemic. Shortly after the end of the pandemic, the changes in the supply and utilisation of GP services had not yet returned to pre-pandemic levels. This applied, for example, to aspects of the organisation of consultation hours, where sustainable changes and improvements have been made. Even after the end of the pandemic, GPs and MPAs are still calling for appropriate remuneration, better appreciation and less bureaucracy.

Conclusion

Reflecting on the changes in GP practices during and after the pandemic could provide important information about lessons learned, potentially useful adjustments and opportunities for improvements to daily practice as well as highlighting the importance of work satisfaction of GPs and MPAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信