医院蛋白质药物的运输:气动运输与手工运输时机械应力的比较。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Pauline Barreau, Fréderic Feutry, Marie Abelé, Alexandre Villain, Ilyes Sakji, Guillaume Marliot
{"title":"医院蛋白质药物的运输:气动运输与手工运输时机械应力的比较。","authors":"Pauline Barreau,&nbsp;Fréderic Feutry,&nbsp;Marie Abelé,&nbsp;Alexandre Villain,&nbsp;Ilyes Sakji,&nbsp;Guillaume Marliot","doi":"10.1016/j.xphs.2025.103715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we quantitatively characterize the mechanical shock generated in the pneumatic transport systems (PTS) in our center, determine the PTS pipeline with the highest risk of mechanical stress, and compare these results with hand-carried transport by trolleys or transportation boxes. Acceleration measurements were performed in triplicate for each of the five departments using a 3-axis accelerometer, which was fixed to three distinct experimental bags and a syringe. We measured the area under the curve (AUC) of the acceleration distribution with a threshold of 2 g, and the number of acceleration peaks (NAP) from &gt;3 to 15 g-forces. The data obtained were calculated using bilateral Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests. The AUC and NAP<sub>3–15</sub> g-forces for PTS were significantly greater than those for hand-carried transport by trolley and box (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), which did not show any peak above the NAP<sub>10</sub>. The PTS pipeline with more curves and redirection airlocks had the highest risk of mechanical stress, whereas no difference was observed per type of container. Transport by trolley had significantly greater (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) AUC, NAP<sub>3</sub>, and NAP<sub>5</sub> than by box. Our results indicate that there is greater mechanical stress arising during PTS transportation than during hand-carried transport, preferentially in transportation boxes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"114 5","pages":"Article 103715"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transportation of protein drugs at hospital: Comparison of mechanical stress occurring during pneumatic transportation and hand-carried transport\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Barreau,&nbsp;Fréderic Feutry,&nbsp;Marie Abelé,&nbsp;Alexandre Villain,&nbsp;Ilyes Sakji,&nbsp;Guillaume Marliot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xphs.2025.103715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, we quantitatively characterize the mechanical shock generated in the pneumatic transport systems (PTS) in our center, determine the PTS pipeline with the highest risk of mechanical stress, and compare these results with hand-carried transport by trolleys or transportation boxes. Acceleration measurements were performed in triplicate for each of the five departments using a 3-axis accelerometer, which was fixed to three distinct experimental bags and a syringe. We measured the area under the curve (AUC) of the acceleration distribution with a threshold of 2 g, and the number of acceleration peaks (NAP) from &gt;3 to 15 g-forces. The data obtained were calculated using bilateral Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests. The AUC and NAP<sub>3–15</sub> g-forces for PTS were significantly greater than those for hand-carried transport by trolley and box (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), which did not show any peak above the NAP<sub>10</sub>. The PTS pipeline with more curves and redirection airlocks had the highest risk of mechanical stress, whereas no difference was observed per type of container. Transport by trolley had significantly greater (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) AUC, NAP<sub>3</sub>, and NAP<sub>5</sub> than by box. Our results indicate that there is greater mechanical stress arising during PTS transportation than during hand-carried transport, preferentially in transportation boxes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences\",\"volume\":\"114 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 103715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002235492500173X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002235492500173X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们定量地描述了在我们中心的气动输送系统(PTS)中产生的机械冲击,确定了机械应力风险最高的PTS管道,并将这些结果与手推车或运输箱的手工运输进行了比较。使用3轴加速度计对五个部门中的每个部门进行三次加速度测量,该加速度计固定在三个不同的实验袋和注射器上。我们测量了阈值为2 g时加速度分布的曲线下面积(AUC),以及加速度峰值(NAP)在3 ~ 15 g力范围内的数量。所得数据采用双侧Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney非参数检验计算。PTS组的AUC和NAP3-15 g力明显大于手推车和箱子搬运组(p10)。具有更多曲线和重定向气闸的PTS管道具有最高的机械应力风险,而不同类型的容器没有观察到差异。无轨电车运输的p3、NAP5均显著高于箱式运输。我们的研究结果表明,在PTS运输过程中产生的机械应力比手工运输时更大,尤其是在运输箱中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transportation of protein drugs at hospital: Comparison of mechanical stress occurring during pneumatic transportation and hand-carried transport
In this study, we quantitatively characterize the mechanical shock generated in the pneumatic transport systems (PTS) in our center, determine the PTS pipeline with the highest risk of mechanical stress, and compare these results with hand-carried transport by trolleys or transportation boxes. Acceleration measurements were performed in triplicate for each of the five departments using a 3-axis accelerometer, which was fixed to three distinct experimental bags and a syringe. We measured the area under the curve (AUC) of the acceleration distribution with a threshold of 2 g, and the number of acceleration peaks (NAP) from >3 to 15 g-forces. The data obtained were calculated using bilateral Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests. The AUC and NAP3–15 g-forces for PTS were significantly greater than those for hand-carried transport by trolley and box (p < 0.001), which did not show any peak above the NAP10. The PTS pipeline with more curves and redirection airlocks had the highest risk of mechanical stress, whereas no difference was observed per type of container. Transport by trolley had significantly greater (p < 0.001) AUC, NAP3, and NAP5 than by box. Our results indicate that there is greater mechanical stress arising during PTS transportation than during hand-carried transport, preferentially in transportation boxes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
367
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences will publish original research papers, original research notes, invited topical reviews (including Minireviews), and editorial commentary and news. The area of focus shall be concepts in basic pharmaceutical science and such topics as chemical processing of pharmaceuticals, including crystallization, lyophilization, chemical stability of drugs, pharmacokinetics, biopharmaceutics, pharmacodynamics, pro-drug developments, metabolic disposition of bioactive agents, dosage form design, protein-peptide chemistry and biotechnology specifically as these relate to pharmaceutical technology, and targeted drug delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信