机器人训练和肉毒毒素对上肢痉挛和运动功能的联合作用和时间:一项单盲随机对照先导研究

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Joon-Ho Shin, Gyulee Park, Hayeon Kim, Duk Youn Cho, Suncheol Kwon
{"title":"机器人训练和肉毒毒素对上肢痉挛和运动功能的联合作用和时间:一项单盲随机对照先导研究","authors":"Joon-Ho Shin, Gyulee Park, Hayeon Kim, Duk Youn Cho, Suncheol Kwon","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01584-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the combined effects of robotic training (RT) and botulinum toxin (BTX) injections on motor function and spasticity in individuals with post-stroke upper limb spasticity (ULS). We also sought to investigate the optimal timing of RT and BTX administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two participants with chronic stroke-induced ULS were initially enrolled and randomized into four groups: Group B4R4 (RT + BTX at 4 weeks [W4]), Group B0R0 (RT + BTX at baseline [W0]), Group B0R4 (BTX at W0, RT at W4), and Group B4R0 (RT at W0, BTX at W4). Clinical assessments and robotic kinematic evaluations were performed at W0, W4, and 8 weeks (W8). The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) score, and secondary outcomes included the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) of the elbow and kinematic parameters, such as spectral arc length, mean speed, hand path ratio, and movement deviation in various tasks. Changes in outcome measures over time were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects regression model or ordinal logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 42 participants, 40 completed the study. From W0 to W4, Group B0R0 exhibited the most favorable outcomes in terms of spasticity (MAS-elbow flexor and extensor) and kinematic variables, suggesting that the combined application of BTX and RT is superior to sole interventions in improving motor function and spasticity. From W0 to W8, Group B0R4 demonstrated the most substantial improvements in FMA scores and kinematic parameters, indicating that the combined use of BTX and RT, particularly when RT is initiated 1 month after BTX injection, results in superior functional outcomes compared to other intervention timings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of RT and BTX is more effective in enhancing motor function and reducing spasticity in individuals with ULS than either intervention alone or no intervention. Furthermore, the timing of RT relative to BTX injection plays a critical role in maximizing therapeutic benefits in individuals with stroke and ULS, given the distinct modes of action of each intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov NCT02228863. The study was retrospectively registered on August 23, 2014.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined effects and timing of robotic training and botulinum toxin on upper limb spasticity and motor function: a single‑blinded randomized controlled pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Joon-Ho Shin, Gyulee Park, Hayeon Kim, Duk Youn Cho, Suncheol Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12984-025-01584-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the combined effects of robotic training (RT) and botulinum toxin (BTX) injections on motor function and spasticity in individuals with post-stroke upper limb spasticity (ULS). We also sought to investigate the optimal timing of RT and BTX administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two participants with chronic stroke-induced ULS were initially enrolled and randomized into four groups: Group B4R4 (RT + BTX at 4 weeks [W4]), Group B0R0 (RT + BTX at baseline [W0]), Group B0R4 (BTX at W0, RT at W4), and Group B4R0 (RT at W0, BTX at W4). Clinical assessments and robotic kinematic evaluations were performed at W0, W4, and 8 weeks (W8). The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) score, and secondary outcomes included the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) of the elbow and kinematic parameters, such as spectral arc length, mean speed, hand path ratio, and movement deviation in various tasks. Changes in outcome measures over time were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects regression model or ordinal logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 42 participants, 40 completed the study. From W0 to W4, Group B0R0 exhibited the most favorable outcomes in terms of spasticity (MAS-elbow flexor and extensor) and kinematic variables, suggesting that the combined application of BTX and RT is superior to sole interventions in improving motor function and spasticity. From W0 to W8, Group B0R4 demonstrated the most substantial improvements in FMA scores and kinematic parameters, indicating that the combined use of BTX and RT, particularly when RT is initiated 1 month after BTX injection, results in superior functional outcomes compared to other intervention timings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of RT and BTX is more effective in enhancing motor function and reducing spasticity in individuals with ULS than either intervention alone or no intervention. Furthermore, the timing of RT relative to BTX injection plays a critical role in maximizing therapeutic benefits in individuals with stroke and ULS, given the distinct modes of action of each intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov NCT02228863. The study was retrospectively registered on August 23, 2014.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884042/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01584-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01584-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估机器人训练(RT)和肉毒毒素(BTX)注射对脑卒中后上肢痉挛(ULS)患者运动功能和痉挛的联合影响。我们还试图探讨RT和BTX给药的最佳时机。方法:42例慢性卒中诱导的ULS患者初始入组,随机分为4组:B4R4组(4周时RT + BTX [W4])、B0R0组(基线时RT + BTX [W0])、B0R4组(W0时BTX, W4时RT)和B4R0组(W0时RT, W4时BTX)。在W0、W4和8周(W8)进行临床评估和机器人运动学评估。主要结果为Fugl-Meyer评估(FMA)评分,次要结果包括肘部改良Ashworth量表(MAS)和运动学参数,如谱弧长、平均速度、手径比和各种任务中的运动偏差。使用线性混合效应回归模型或有序逻辑回归分析结果测量随时间的变化。结果:42名参与者中,40人完成了研究。从W0到W4, B0R0组在痉挛(mas -肘关节屈伸肌)和运动学变量方面表现出最有利的结果,表明BTX和RT联合应用在改善运动功能和痉挛方面优于单独干预。从W0到W8, B0R4组在FMA评分和运动学参数方面表现出最显著的改善,这表明BTX和RT联合使用,特别是在BTX注射后1个月开始RT,与其他干预时间相比,功能结果更好。结论:与单独干预或不干预相比,RT联合BTX在增强ULS患者运动功能和减少痉挛方面更有效。此外,考虑到每种干预的不同作用模式,相对于BTX注射的RT时间在卒中和ULS患者的治疗效果最大化中起着关键作用。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov NCT02228863。该研究于2014年8月23日回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined effects and timing of robotic training and botulinum toxin on upper limb spasticity and motor function: a single‑blinded randomized controlled pilot study.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the combined effects of robotic training (RT) and botulinum toxin (BTX) injections on motor function and spasticity in individuals with post-stroke upper limb spasticity (ULS). We also sought to investigate the optimal timing of RT and BTX administration.

Methods: Forty-two participants with chronic stroke-induced ULS were initially enrolled and randomized into four groups: Group B4R4 (RT + BTX at 4 weeks [W4]), Group B0R0 (RT + BTX at baseline [W0]), Group B0R4 (BTX at W0, RT at W4), and Group B4R0 (RT at W0, BTX at W4). Clinical assessments and robotic kinematic evaluations were performed at W0, W4, and 8 weeks (W8). The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) score, and secondary outcomes included the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) of the elbow and kinematic parameters, such as spectral arc length, mean speed, hand path ratio, and movement deviation in various tasks. Changes in outcome measures over time were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects regression model or ordinal logistic regression.

Results: Of the 42 participants, 40 completed the study. From W0 to W4, Group B0R0 exhibited the most favorable outcomes in terms of spasticity (MAS-elbow flexor and extensor) and kinematic variables, suggesting that the combined application of BTX and RT is superior to sole interventions in improving motor function and spasticity. From W0 to W8, Group B0R4 demonstrated the most substantial improvements in FMA scores and kinematic parameters, indicating that the combined use of BTX and RT, particularly when RT is initiated 1 month after BTX injection, results in superior functional outcomes compared to other intervention timings.

Conclusions: The combination of RT and BTX is more effective in enhancing motor function and reducing spasticity in individuals with ULS than either intervention alone or no intervention. Furthermore, the timing of RT relative to BTX injection plays a critical role in maximizing therapeutic benefits in individuals with stroke and ULS, given the distinct modes of action of each intervention.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02228863. The study was retrospectively registered on August 23, 2014.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信