{"title":"JCOG妇科肿瘤研究组晚期卵巢癌患者新辅助化疗后间歇减积手术中淋巴结清扫程度的问卷调查","authors":"Yuki Iida, Mayumi Kobayashi-Kato, Hiroaki Komatsu, Mitsuya Ishikawa, Toyomi Satoh","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02734-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The significance of lymph node dissection (LND) in primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer was demonstrated in the LION trial. However, the role and the current practices of LND during interval debulking surgery (IDS) remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a survey of the current LND practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire-based survey regarding the criteria and extent of LND for advanced ovarian cancer was conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). We defined enlarged lymph nodes as 10 mm or more in the short axis on imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included data from 51 institutions. Factors contributing to the decision regarding the extent of LND included performance status, completeness of cytoreductive surgery excluding the lymph nodes, and age. Regarding PDS cases with enlarged lymph nodes, 90% of all institutions opted for systematic LND (SyLND) or removal of only the enlarged lymph nodes (SeLND). In IDS cases with enlarged lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), 15 (29%) and 35 (69%) institutions opted for SyLND and SeLND, respectively. In contrast, in IDS cases in which enlarged lymph nodes were reduced after NACT, approximately half the institutions opted for no LND.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found no established standard treatment for LND during IDS in patients with enlarged lymph nodes among the JCOG institutions. Thus, further prospective studies comparing the prognostic outcomes with or without LND are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1040-1047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questionnaire-based survey on the extent of lymph node dissection during interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the Gynecologic Cancer Study Group of JCOG.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Iida, Mayumi Kobayashi-Kato, Hiroaki Komatsu, Mitsuya Ishikawa, Toyomi Satoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-025-02734-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The significance of lymph node dissection (LND) in primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer was demonstrated in the LION trial. However, the role and the current practices of LND during interval debulking surgery (IDS) remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a survey of the current LND practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire-based survey regarding the criteria and extent of LND for advanced ovarian cancer was conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). We defined enlarged lymph nodes as 10 mm or more in the short axis on imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included data from 51 institutions. Factors contributing to the decision regarding the extent of LND included performance status, completeness of cytoreductive surgery excluding the lymph nodes, and age. Regarding PDS cases with enlarged lymph nodes, 90% of all institutions opted for systematic LND (SyLND) or removal of only the enlarged lymph nodes (SeLND). In IDS cases with enlarged lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), 15 (29%) and 35 (69%) institutions opted for SyLND and SeLND, respectively. In contrast, in IDS cases in which enlarged lymph nodes were reduced after NACT, approximately half the institutions opted for no LND.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found no established standard treatment for LND during IDS in patients with enlarged lymph nodes among the JCOG institutions. Thus, further prospective studies comparing the prognostic outcomes with or without LND are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1040-1047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02734-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02734-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Questionnaire-based survey on the extent of lymph node dissection during interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer in the Gynecologic Cancer Study Group of JCOG.
Background: The significance of lymph node dissection (LND) in primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer was demonstrated in the LION trial. However, the role and the current practices of LND during interval debulking surgery (IDS) remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a survey of the current LND practices.
Methods: A questionnaire-based survey regarding the criteria and extent of LND for advanced ovarian cancer was conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG). We defined enlarged lymph nodes as 10 mm or more in the short axis on imaging.
Results: This study included data from 51 institutions. Factors contributing to the decision regarding the extent of LND included performance status, completeness of cytoreductive surgery excluding the lymph nodes, and age. Regarding PDS cases with enlarged lymph nodes, 90% of all institutions opted for systematic LND (SyLND) or removal of only the enlarged lymph nodes (SeLND). In IDS cases with enlarged lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), 15 (29%) and 35 (69%) institutions opted for SyLND and SeLND, respectively. In contrast, in IDS cases in which enlarged lymph nodes were reduced after NACT, approximately half the institutions opted for no LND.
Conclusion: This study found no established standard treatment for LND during IDS in patients with enlarged lymph nodes among the JCOG institutions. Thus, further prospective studies comparing the prognostic outcomes with or without LND are warranted.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
