Arian Zaboli, Francesco Brigo, Gabriele Magnarelli, Hugh Gorick, Tiziano Garbin, Patrick Clauser, Serena Sibilio, Gloria Brigiari, Magdalena Massar, Michael Mian, Norbert Pfeifer, Gianni Turcato
{"title":"曼彻斯特分诊系统的可重复性:一个多中心的小插曲研究。","authors":"Arian Zaboli, Francesco Brigo, Gabriele Magnarelli, Hugh Gorick, Tiziano Garbin, Patrick Clauser, Serena Sibilio, Gloria Brigiari, Magdalena Massar, Michael Mian, Norbert Pfeifer, Gianni Turcato","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While several studies have evaluated the performance of the Manchester Triage System (MTS), none have specifically examined its accurate application by triage nurses and its association with clinical outcomes. This study focuses on the agreement between nurse-assigned MTS codes and those assigned by an expert group, as well as their ability to predict clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre simulation study was conducted from January to March 2024 across four EDs in Italy employing MTS in clinical practice. Two emergency physicians developed 30 vignettes derived from real clinical cases to encompass diverse triage scenarios and priority codes. An expert MTS group, composed of three experienced nurses, assigned MTS priority codes following the guidelines outlined in the official MTS textbook. Subsequently, the vignettes were presented to triage nurses, who independently assigned MTS codes. Error rate, agreement between nurse-assigned and expert MTS group codes, and the predictive ability for secondary clinical outcomes (mortality within 72 hours, hospitalisation, life-saving intervention, severe condition in the ED and time-dependent pathology) were compared between the MTS priority assigned by the expert MTS group codes and nurse-assigned triage codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77 nurses from four EDs participated. The triage code assignment error rate was 28.6% (660/2310). The overall agreement between the triage and expert nurses yielded a Cohen's kappa of 0.59 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.59). Expert MTS group applications performed better compared with nurse-assigned codes in predicting clinical outcomes. The mean error rate per nurse was 30% (9/30). Nurses with more ED experience and triage expertise had higher error rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of MTS using case vignettes was suboptimal in our setting, with more senior nurses having higher error rates. Correct application of MTS better predicted clinical outcomes. It is important to conduct future studies to understand how to best support nursing clinical decision-making in triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"403-410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of the Manchester Triage System: a multicentre vignette study.\",\"authors\":\"Arian Zaboli, Francesco Brigo, Gabriele Magnarelli, Hugh Gorick, Tiziano Garbin, Patrick Clauser, Serena Sibilio, Gloria Brigiari, Magdalena Massar, Michael Mian, Norbert Pfeifer, Gianni Turcato\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2024-214213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While several studies have evaluated the performance of the Manchester Triage System (MTS), none have specifically examined its accurate application by triage nurses and its association with clinical outcomes. This study focuses on the agreement between nurse-assigned MTS codes and those assigned by an expert group, as well as their ability to predict clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre simulation study was conducted from January to March 2024 across four EDs in Italy employing MTS in clinical practice. Two emergency physicians developed 30 vignettes derived from real clinical cases to encompass diverse triage scenarios and priority codes. An expert MTS group, composed of three experienced nurses, assigned MTS priority codes following the guidelines outlined in the official MTS textbook. Subsequently, the vignettes were presented to triage nurses, who independently assigned MTS codes. Error rate, agreement between nurse-assigned and expert MTS group codes, and the predictive ability for secondary clinical outcomes (mortality within 72 hours, hospitalisation, life-saving intervention, severe condition in the ED and time-dependent pathology) were compared between the MTS priority assigned by the expert MTS group codes and nurse-assigned triage codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77 nurses from four EDs participated. The triage code assignment error rate was 28.6% (660/2310). The overall agreement between the triage and expert nurses yielded a Cohen's kappa of 0.59 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.59). Expert MTS group applications performed better compared with nurse-assigned codes in predicting clinical outcomes. The mean error rate per nurse was 30% (9/30). Nurses with more ED experience and triage expertise had higher error rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of MTS using case vignettes was suboptimal in our setting, with more senior nurses having higher error rates. Correct application of MTS better predicted clinical outcomes. It is important to conduct future studies to understand how to best support nursing clinical decision-making in triage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"403-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214213\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然有几项研究评估了曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)的性能,但没有一项研究专门研究了分诊护士对其准确应用及其与临床结果的关联。本研究的重点是护士分配的MTS代码和由专家组分配的代码之间的协议,以及他们预测临床结果的能力。方法:这项多中心模拟研究于2024年1月至3月在意大利的四个急诊科进行,在临床实践中采用MTS。两名急诊医生根据真实的临床病例开发了30个小插曲,以涵盖不同的分诊方案和优先级代码。由三名经验丰富的护士组成的专家MTS小组按照MTS官方教科书中概述的指导方针分配了MTS优先代码。随后,这些小插曲被呈现给分诊护士,他们独立分配MTS代码。比较由专家MTS组代码和护士分配的分诊代码分配的MTS优先级之间的错误率、护士分配的MTS组代码和专家MTS组代码之间的一致性,以及对次要临床结果(72小时内死亡率、住院治疗、挽救生命的干预、急诊科严重状况和时间依赖性病理)的预测能力。结果:来自4个急诊科的77名护士参与了调查。分诊码分配错误率为28.6%(660/2310)。分诊和专家护士之间的总体一致性产生了0.59的科恩kappa (95% CI 0.58至0.59)。与护士分配代码相比,专家MTS组应用程序在预测临床结果方面表现更好。护士平均错误率为30%(9/30)。具有更多急诊经验和分诊专业知识的护士错误率更高。结论:在我们的环境中,MTS使用病例图片的应用并不理想,更多的高级护士有更高的错误率。正确应用MTS能更好地预测临床结果。了解如何在分诊中最好地支持护理临床决策是未来研究的重要内容。
Reproducibility of the Manchester Triage System: a multicentre vignette study.
Background: While several studies have evaluated the performance of the Manchester Triage System (MTS), none have specifically examined its accurate application by triage nurses and its association with clinical outcomes. This study focuses on the agreement between nurse-assigned MTS codes and those assigned by an expert group, as well as their ability to predict clinical outcomes.
Methods: This multicentre simulation study was conducted from January to March 2024 across four EDs in Italy employing MTS in clinical practice. Two emergency physicians developed 30 vignettes derived from real clinical cases to encompass diverse triage scenarios and priority codes. An expert MTS group, composed of three experienced nurses, assigned MTS priority codes following the guidelines outlined in the official MTS textbook. Subsequently, the vignettes were presented to triage nurses, who independently assigned MTS codes. Error rate, agreement between nurse-assigned and expert MTS group codes, and the predictive ability for secondary clinical outcomes (mortality within 72 hours, hospitalisation, life-saving intervention, severe condition in the ED and time-dependent pathology) were compared between the MTS priority assigned by the expert MTS group codes and nurse-assigned triage codes.
Results: 77 nurses from four EDs participated. The triage code assignment error rate was 28.6% (660/2310). The overall agreement between the triage and expert nurses yielded a Cohen's kappa of 0.59 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.59). Expert MTS group applications performed better compared with nurse-assigned codes in predicting clinical outcomes. The mean error rate per nurse was 30% (9/30). Nurses with more ED experience and triage expertise had higher error rates.
Conclusion: The application of MTS using case vignettes was suboptimal in our setting, with more senior nurses having higher error rates. Correct application of MTS better predicted clinical outcomes. It is important to conduct future studies to understand how to best support nursing clinical decision-making in triage.
期刊介绍:
The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.