IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rebecca Clark, Tamar Klaiman, Kathy Sliwinski, Rebecca Hamm, Emilia Flores
{"title":"Communication failures and racial disparities in inpatient maternity care: a qualitative content analysis of incident reports.","authors":"Rebecca Clark, Tamar Klaiman, Kathy Sliwinski, Rebecca Hamm, Emilia Flores","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and mortality disproportionality affect Black women in the USA. Communication failures are a leading cause of poor maternal outcomes. We examined incident reports to identify communication failures within inpatient maternity care and racial disparities therein.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed de-identified incident reports submitted by hospital staff working on antepartum, labour and birth, and postpartum in an urban, academic hospital between 2019 and 2022. Reports were linked to electronic health records to capture race and SMM outcome. We conducted qualitative content analyses using a constant comparative method and an inductive and deductive approach. We explored communication failures by race/ethnicity and SMM outcome. In vivo themes included equity and positive communication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 541 communication failures within a random sample (n=1006) of incident reports across the study period. Black women represented 28% of births during this time, but 38% of the incident reports. Most of the communication failures occurred within the healthcare team rather than with patients. Communication failures were, broadly, contextual (eg, audience, who was present), conceptual (eg, lack of shared understanding) or sociotechnical (eg, computer-human interface). Of the incident reports coded as contextual failures, errors of omission were the most common. Most conceptual failures were a lack of shared understanding. Sociotechnical failures were predominantly workflow and communication and internal organisational features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that if we want to address communication failures as a root cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, we need to focus on the quality of communication within the healthcare team. These efforts should concentrate on decreasing omission and building shared understanding of responsibilities and processes, especially when teams are caring for Black women.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,严重的孕产妇发病率(SMM)和死亡率不成比例地影响着黑人妇女。沟通失败是导致孕产妇不良结局的主要原因。我们研究了事故报告,以确定住院孕产妇护理中的沟通失败以及其中的种族差异:我们分析了一家城市学术医院的产前、分娩和产后工作人员在 2019 年至 2022 年期间提交的去标识化事件报告。报告与电子健康记录相链接,以获取种族和 SMM 结果。我们使用恒定比较法和归纳与演绎法进行了定性内容分析。我们按种族/族裔和 SMM 结果探讨了沟通失败的原因。其中的活体主题包括公平和积极沟通:在整个研究期间,我们在随机抽样(n=1006)的事件报告中发现了 541 次沟通失败。在此期间,黑人妇女占新生儿总数的 28%,但占事故报告的 38%。大多数沟通失败发生在医疗团队内部,而非与患者之间。沟通失败的原因大致有环境因素(如受众、在场人员)、概念因素(如缺乏共识)或社会技术因素(如计算机-人机界面)。在被编码为背景失误的事件报告中,遗漏错误最为常见。大多数概念性失误是缺乏共同理解。社会技术方面的失误主要是工作流程、沟通和内部组织特征:我们的研究结果表明,如果要解决沟通失败这一导致孕产妇发病和死亡的根本原因,我们就需要关注医疗团队内部的沟通质量。这些努力应集中在减少疏忽和建立对责任和流程的共同理解上,尤其是在团队为黑人妇女提供护理时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication failures and racial disparities in inpatient maternity care: a qualitative content analysis of incident reports.

Background: Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and mortality disproportionality affect Black women in the USA. Communication failures are a leading cause of poor maternal outcomes. We examined incident reports to identify communication failures within inpatient maternity care and racial disparities therein.

Methods: We analysed de-identified incident reports submitted by hospital staff working on antepartum, labour and birth, and postpartum in an urban, academic hospital between 2019 and 2022. Reports were linked to electronic health records to capture race and SMM outcome. We conducted qualitative content analyses using a constant comparative method and an inductive and deductive approach. We explored communication failures by race/ethnicity and SMM outcome. In vivo themes included equity and positive communication.

Results: We identified 541 communication failures within a random sample (n=1006) of incident reports across the study period. Black women represented 28% of births during this time, but 38% of the incident reports. Most of the communication failures occurred within the healthcare team rather than with patients. Communication failures were, broadly, contextual (eg, audience, who was present), conceptual (eg, lack of shared understanding) or sociotechnical (eg, computer-human interface). Of the incident reports coded as contextual failures, errors of omission were the most common. Most conceptual failures were a lack of shared understanding. Sociotechnical failures were predominantly workflow and communication and internal organisational features.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that if we want to address communication failures as a root cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, we need to focus on the quality of communication within the healthcare team. These efforts should concentrate on decreasing omission and building shared understanding of responsibilities and processes, especially when teams are caring for Black women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信