丹麦劳动力中怀孕雇员的职业体育活动:精确的职业队列概况。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S496585
Hannah Nørtoft Frankel, Katia Keglberg Hærvig, Esben Meulengracht Flachs, Mette Korshøj, Charlotte Bertelsen, Mette Backhausen, Camilla Sandal Sejbaek, Luise Mølenberg Begtrup
{"title":"丹麦劳动力中怀孕雇员的职业体育活动:精确的职业队列概况。","authors":"Hannah Nørtoft Frankel, Katia Keglberg Hærvig, Esben Meulengracht Flachs, Mette Korshøj, Charlotte Bertelsen, Mette Backhausen, Camilla Sandal Sejbaek, Luise Mølenberg Begtrup","doi":"10.2147/CLEP.S496585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Occupational physical activity (OPA) has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes, although findings are not consistent. This paper describes the PRECISE Occupational Cohort, designed with the purpose to obtain comprehensive information on OPA with objective measurements and prospective information on pregnancy-related discomforts and sick leave among pregnant employees in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1556 pregnant participants were included between January 2023 and June 2024 from six obstetric departments in relation to the first trimester ultrasound scan. Information on OPA, pregnancy-related discomforts and sick leave was collected by repeated weekly questionnaires. Additionally, a subgroup of 327 pregnant participants and 90 non-pregnant co-workers were invited for repeated objective measurements, and/or workplace observations. A total of 603 accelerometer measurements from 412 unique participants, and 138 workplace observations were obtained from 102 unique participants. Time spent standing, walking and forward bending was acquired by accelerometers, and information on lifting and person-handlings was quantified by observations. All participants covered 197 occupational codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1008 pregnant participants on average responded to the weekly questionnaires from pregnancy weeks 12-40. High frequencies of pregnancy discomforts were reported throughout pregnancy, and on average only 11% reported no discomforts. Pregnancy-related sick leave increased throughout pregnancy, peaking in pregnancy week 29, where 26% reported at least one day of pregnancy-related sick leave in the past week.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cohort provides unique repeated measurements with comprehensive information about pregnant employees across many jobs, disclosing high levels of pregnancy discomforts and sick leave throughout pregnancy. The information will enable investigation of the associations of OPA, pregnancy-related discomforts and sick leave on a more detailed level than now. The objective measurements with novel information on OPA will contribute to the development of quantitative Job Exposure Matrices enabling investigation of the association between OPA and adverse pregnancy outcomes in larger populations, with the potential to strengthen preventive guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":10362,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"211-224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Physical Activity Among Pregnant Employees in the Danish Workforce: The PRECISE Occupational Cohort Profile.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Nørtoft Frankel, Katia Keglberg Hærvig, Esben Meulengracht Flachs, Mette Korshøj, Charlotte Bertelsen, Mette Backhausen, Camilla Sandal Sejbaek, Luise Mølenberg Begtrup\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CLEP.S496585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Occupational physical activity (OPA) has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes, although findings are not consistent. This paper describes the PRECISE Occupational Cohort, designed with the purpose to obtain comprehensive information on OPA with objective measurements and prospective information on pregnancy-related discomforts and sick leave among pregnant employees in Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1556 pregnant participants were included between January 2023 and June 2024 from six obstetric departments in relation to the first trimester ultrasound scan. Information on OPA, pregnancy-related discomforts and sick leave was collected by repeated weekly questionnaires. Additionally, a subgroup of 327 pregnant participants and 90 non-pregnant co-workers were invited for repeated objective measurements, and/or workplace observations. A total of 603 accelerometer measurements from 412 unique participants, and 138 workplace observations were obtained from 102 unique participants. Time spent standing, walking and forward bending was acquired by accelerometers, and information on lifting and person-handlings was quantified by observations. All participants covered 197 occupational codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1008 pregnant participants on average responded to the weekly questionnaires from pregnancy weeks 12-40. High frequencies of pregnancy discomforts were reported throughout pregnancy, and on average only 11% reported no discomforts. Pregnancy-related sick leave increased throughout pregnancy, peaking in pregnancy week 29, where 26% reported at least one day of pregnancy-related sick leave in the past week.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cohort provides unique repeated measurements with comprehensive information about pregnant employees across many jobs, disclosing high levels of pregnancy discomforts and sick leave throughout pregnancy. The information will enable investigation of the associations of OPA, pregnancy-related discomforts and sick leave on a more detailed level than now. The objective measurements with novel information on OPA will contribute to the development of quantitative Job Exposure Matrices enabling investigation of the association between OPA and adverse pregnancy outcomes in larger populations, with the potential to strengthen preventive guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"211-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S496585\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S496585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:职业体力活动(OPA)与不良妊娠结局有关,尽管研究结果并不一致。本文描述了精确的职业队列,设计的目的是获得全面的信息与客观测量和前瞻性信息的OPA怀孕相关的不适和病假在丹麦的怀孕员工。方法:在2023年1月至2024年6月期间,从6个产科部门共纳入1556名与妊娠早期超声扫描有关的孕妇。通过每周重复的问卷调查收集OPA、妊娠相关不适和病假的信息。此外,327名怀孕参与者和90名未怀孕的同事被邀请进行重复的客观测量和/或工作场所观察。来自412名参与者的603个加速度计测量结果,以及来自102名参与者的138个工作场所观察结果。通过加速度计获取站立、行走和前屈的时间,并通过观察量化举重和搬运人员的信息。所有与会者涉及197个职业编码。结果:从妊娠12 ~ 40周,平均每周有1008名孕妇参与问卷调查。据报道,在整个怀孕期间,怀孕不适的频率很高,平均只有11%的人没有不适。与怀孕有关的病假在整个怀孕期间都在增加,在怀孕第29周达到高峰,其中26%的人报告在过去一周至少休了一天与怀孕有关的病假。结论:该队列提供了独特的重复测量,提供了许多工作中怀孕员工的全面信息,揭示了怀孕期间的高水平不适和病假。这些资料将使我们能够比现在更详细地调查外用药、与怀孕有关的不适和病假之间的关系。关于非口服避孕药的新信息的客观测量将有助于制定定量的工作接触矩阵,以便在更大的人口中调查非口服避孕药与不良妊娠结果之间的关系,并有可能加强预防指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupational Physical Activity Among Pregnant Employees in the Danish Workforce: The PRECISE Occupational Cohort Profile.

Purpose: Occupational physical activity (OPA) has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes, although findings are not consistent. This paper describes the PRECISE Occupational Cohort, designed with the purpose to obtain comprehensive information on OPA with objective measurements and prospective information on pregnancy-related discomforts and sick leave among pregnant employees in Denmark.

Methods: A total of 1556 pregnant participants were included between January 2023 and June 2024 from six obstetric departments in relation to the first trimester ultrasound scan. Information on OPA, pregnancy-related discomforts and sick leave was collected by repeated weekly questionnaires. Additionally, a subgroup of 327 pregnant participants and 90 non-pregnant co-workers were invited for repeated objective measurements, and/or workplace observations. A total of 603 accelerometer measurements from 412 unique participants, and 138 workplace observations were obtained from 102 unique participants. Time spent standing, walking and forward bending was acquired by accelerometers, and information on lifting and person-handlings was quantified by observations. All participants covered 197 occupational codes.

Results: A total of 1008 pregnant participants on average responded to the weekly questionnaires from pregnancy weeks 12-40. High frequencies of pregnancy discomforts were reported throughout pregnancy, and on average only 11% reported no discomforts. Pregnancy-related sick leave increased throughout pregnancy, peaking in pregnancy week 29, where 26% reported at least one day of pregnancy-related sick leave in the past week.

Conclusion: This cohort provides unique repeated measurements with comprehensive information about pregnant employees across many jobs, disclosing high levels of pregnancy discomforts and sick leave throughout pregnancy. The information will enable investigation of the associations of OPA, pregnancy-related discomforts and sick leave on a more detailed level than now. The objective measurements with novel information on OPA will contribute to the development of quantitative Job Exposure Matrices enabling investigation of the association between OPA and adverse pregnancy outcomes in larger populations, with the potential to strengthen preventive guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology
Clinical Epidemiology Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
169
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal. Clinical Epidemiology focuses on the application of epidemiological principles and questions relating to patients and clinical care in terms of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Clinical Epidemiology welcomes papers covering these topics in form of original research and systematic reviews. Clinical Epidemiology has a special interest in international electronic medical patient records and other routine health care data, especially as applied to safety of medical interventions, clinical utility of diagnostic procedures, understanding short- and long-term clinical course of diseases, clinical epidemiological and biostatistical methods, and systematic reviews. When considering submission of a paper utilizing publicly-available data, authors should ensure that such studies add significantly to the body of knowledge and that they use appropriate validated methods for identifying health outcomes. The journal has launched special series describing existing data sources for clinical epidemiology, international health care systems and validation studies of algorithms based on databases and registries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信