{"title":"同位旋反击","authors":"Francesco Rosini, Simone Pacetti","doi":"10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13976-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assuming isospin conservation, the decay of a <span>\\(c\\bar{c}\\)</span> vector meson into the <span>\\(\\Lambda \\bar{\\Sigma }^0+\\mathrm{c.c.}\\)</span> final state is purely electromagnetic. At the leading order, the <span>\\(c\\bar{c}\\)</span> vector meson first converts into a virtual photon that, then produces the <span>\\(\\Lambda \\bar{\\Sigma }^0+\\mathrm{c.c.}\\)</span> final state. Moreover, such a mechanism, i.e., the virtual photon coupling to <span>\\(\\Lambda \\bar{\\Sigma }^0+\\mathrm{c.c.}\\)</span>, is the sole intermediate process through which, in Born approximation, the reaction <span>\\(e^+e^-\\rightarrow \\Lambda \\bar{\\Sigma }^0+\\mathrm{c.c.}\\)</span> does proceed. It follows that any significant difference between the amplitudes of the processes <span>\\(c\\bar{c}\\rightarrow \\Lambda \\bar{\\Sigma }^0+\\mathrm{c.c.}\\)</span> and <span>\\(e^+e^-\\rightarrow \\Lambda \\bar{\\Sigma }^0+\\mathrm{c.c.}\\)</span> at the <span>\\(c\\bar{c}\\)</span> mass must be ascribed to an isospin-violating contribution in the <span>\\(c\\bar{c}\\)</span> decay. In Ferroli et al. (Eur Phys J C 80: 903, 2020) we studied the decay of the <span>\\(\\psi (2S)\\)</span> vector meson into <span>\\(\\Lambda \\bar{\\Sigma }^0+\\mathrm{c.c.}\\)</span> and, on the light of the large branching fraction </p><div><div><span>$$\\begin{aligned} \\textrm{BR}_{18}(\\psi (2S)\\rightarrow \\Lambda \\bar{\\Sigma }^0+\\mathrm{c.c.})=(1.23\\pm 0.24)\\times 10^{-5}, \\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>published in the 2018 edition of the Review of Particle Physics (Tanabashi et al. in Phys Rev D 98: 030001, 2018), we claimed either the presence of a significant isospin-violating contribution or, with a lesser emphasis, a “not complete reliability of the only available datum”. In any case, we propose a new measurement. Apparently, our second and considered less serious hypothesis was the right one, indeed the branching fraction published in the 2024 edition of the Review of Particle Physics (Navas et al. in Phys Rev D 110: 030001, 2024) is </p><div><div><span>$$\\begin{aligned} \\textrm{BR}(\\psi (2S)\\rightarrow \\Lambda \\bar{\\Sigma }^0+\\mathrm{c.c.})=(1.6\\pm 0.7)\\times 10^{-6}, \\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>more than seven times lower with the error that increased from <span>\\(\\sim 20\\%\\)</span> to <span>\\(\\sim 45\\%\\)</span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":788,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal C","volume":"85 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13976-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isospin strikes back\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Rosini, Simone Pacetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13976-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Assuming isospin conservation, the decay of a <span>\\\\(c\\\\bar{c}\\\\)</span> vector meson into the <span>\\\\(\\\\Lambda \\\\bar{\\\\Sigma }^0+\\\\mathrm{c.c.}\\\\)</span> final state is purely electromagnetic. At the leading order, the <span>\\\\(c\\\\bar{c}\\\\)</span> vector meson first converts into a virtual photon that, then produces the <span>\\\\(\\\\Lambda \\\\bar{\\\\Sigma }^0+\\\\mathrm{c.c.}\\\\)</span> final state. Moreover, such a mechanism, i.e., the virtual photon coupling to <span>\\\\(\\\\Lambda \\\\bar{\\\\Sigma }^0+\\\\mathrm{c.c.}\\\\)</span>, is the sole intermediate process through which, in Born approximation, the reaction <span>\\\\(e^+e^-\\\\rightarrow \\\\Lambda \\\\bar{\\\\Sigma }^0+\\\\mathrm{c.c.}\\\\)</span> does proceed. It follows that any significant difference between the amplitudes of the processes <span>\\\\(c\\\\bar{c}\\\\rightarrow \\\\Lambda \\\\bar{\\\\Sigma }^0+\\\\mathrm{c.c.}\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(e^+e^-\\\\rightarrow \\\\Lambda \\\\bar{\\\\Sigma }^0+\\\\mathrm{c.c.}\\\\)</span> at the <span>\\\\(c\\\\bar{c}\\\\)</span> mass must be ascribed to an isospin-violating contribution in the <span>\\\\(c\\\\bar{c}\\\\)</span> decay. In Ferroli et al. (Eur Phys J C 80: 903, 2020) we studied the decay of the <span>\\\\(\\\\psi (2S)\\\\)</span> vector meson into <span>\\\\(\\\\Lambda \\\\bar{\\\\Sigma }^0+\\\\mathrm{c.c.}\\\\)</span> and, on the light of the large branching fraction </p><div><div><span>$$\\\\begin{aligned} \\\\textrm{BR}_{18}(\\\\psi (2S)\\\\rightarrow \\\\Lambda \\\\bar{\\\\Sigma }^0+\\\\mathrm{c.c.})=(1.23\\\\pm 0.24)\\\\times 10^{-5}, \\\\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>published in the 2018 edition of the Review of Particle Physics (Tanabashi et al. in Phys Rev D 98: 030001, 2018), we claimed either the presence of a significant isospin-violating contribution or, with a lesser emphasis, a “not complete reliability of the only available datum”. In any case, we propose a new measurement. Apparently, our second and considered less serious hypothesis was the right one, indeed the branching fraction published in the 2024 edition of the Review of Particle Physics (Navas et al. in Phys Rev D 110: 030001, 2024) is </p><div><div><span>$$\\\\begin{aligned} \\\\textrm{BR}(\\\\psi (2S)\\\\rightarrow \\\\Lambda \\\\bar{\\\\Sigma }^0+\\\\mathrm{c.c.})=(1.6\\\\pm 0.7)\\\\times 10^{-6}, \\\\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>more than seven times lower with the error that increased from <span>\\\\(\\\\sim 20\\\\%\\\\)</span> to <span>\\\\(\\\\sim 45\\\\%\\\\)</span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Physical Journal C\",\"volume\":\"85 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13976-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Physical Journal C\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"4\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13976-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal C","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13976-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
假设同位旋守恒,\(c\bar{c}\)矢量介子到\(\Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\)最终态的衰变是纯电磁的。在第一阶,\(c\bar{c}\)矢量介子首先转换成虚光子,然后产生\(\Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\)最终状态。此外,这种机制,即与\(\Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\)的虚光子耦合,是唯一的中间过程,在玻恩近似中,反应\(e^+e^-\rightarrow \Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\)确实是通过它进行的。由此可见,在\(c\bar{c}\)质量处\(c\bar{c}\rightarrow \Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\)和\(e^+e^-\rightarrow \Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\)过程振幅之间的任何显著差异,都必须归因于\(c\bar{c}\)衰变中违反同位旋的贡献。在Ferroli et al. (Eur Phys J C 80: 903,2020)中,我们研究了\(\psi (2S)\)矢量介子衰变为\(\Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\),并且根据2018年版《粒子物理评论》(Tanabashi et al. In Phys Rev D 98: 030001, 2018)上发表的大分支部分$$\begin{aligned} \textrm{BR}_{18}(\psi (2S)\rightarrow \Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.})=(1.23\pm 0.24)\times 10^{-5}, \end{aligned}$$,我们声称存在重大的同位旋违反贡献,或者不那么强调,“唯一可用的数据不完全可靠”。无论如何,我们提出一种新的测量方法。显然,我们第二个被认为不那么严肃的假设是正确的,实际上,发表在2024年版的《粒子物理评论》(Navas et al. in Phys Rev D 110: 030001, 2024)上的分支分数$$\begin{aligned} \textrm{BR}(\psi (2S)\rightarrow \Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.})=(1.6\pm 0.7)\times 10^{-6}, \end{aligned}$$低了7倍多,误差从\(\sim 20\%\)增加到\(\sim 45\%\)。
Assuming isospin conservation, the decay of a \(c\bar{c}\) vector meson into the \(\Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\) final state is purely electromagnetic. At the leading order, the \(c\bar{c}\) vector meson first converts into a virtual photon that, then produces the \(\Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\) final state. Moreover, such a mechanism, i.e., the virtual photon coupling to \(\Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\), is the sole intermediate process through which, in Born approximation, the reaction \(e^+e^-\rightarrow \Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\) does proceed. It follows that any significant difference between the amplitudes of the processes \(c\bar{c}\rightarrow \Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\) and \(e^+e^-\rightarrow \Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\) at the \(c\bar{c}\) mass must be ascribed to an isospin-violating contribution in the \(c\bar{c}\) decay. In Ferroli et al. (Eur Phys J C 80: 903, 2020) we studied the decay of the \(\psi (2S)\) vector meson into \(\Lambda \bar{\Sigma }^0+\mathrm{c.c.}\) and, on the light of the large branching fraction
published in the 2018 edition of the Review of Particle Physics (Tanabashi et al. in Phys Rev D 98: 030001, 2018), we claimed either the presence of a significant isospin-violating contribution or, with a lesser emphasis, a “not complete reliability of the only available datum”. In any case, we propose a new measurement. Apparently, our second and considered less serious hypothesis was the right one, indeed the branching fraction published in the 2024 edition of the Review of Particle Physics (Navas et al. in Phys Rev D 110: 030001, 2024) is
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physics I: Accelerator Based High-Energy Physics
Hadron and lepton collider physics
Lepton-nucleon scattering
High-energy nuclear reactions
Standard model precision tests
Search for new physics beyond the standard model
Heavy flavour physics
Neutrino properties
Particle detector developments
Computational methods and analysis tools
Experimental Physics II: Astroparticle Physics
Dark matter searches
High-energy cosmic rays
Double beta decay
Long baseline neutrino experiments
Neutrino astronomy
Axions and other weakly interacting light particles
Gravitational waves and observational cosmology
Particle detector developments
Computational methods and analysis tools
Theoretical Physics I: Phenomenology of the Standard Model and Beyond
Electroweak interactions
Quantum chromo dynamics
Heavy quark physics and quark flavour mixing
Neutrino physics
Phenomenology of astro- and cosmoparticle physics
Meson spectroscopy and non-perturbative QCD
Low-energy effective field theories
Lattice field theory
High temperature QCD and heavy ion physics
Phenomenology of supersymmetric extensions of the SM
Phenomenology of non-supersymmetric extensions of the SM
Model building and alternative models of electroweak symmetry breaking
Flavour physics beyond the SM
Computational algorithms and tools...etc.