关于线性等价、规范形式和数字签名

IF 1.4 2区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Tung Chou, Edoardo Persichetti, Paolo Santini
{"title":"关于线性等价、规范形式和数字签名","authors":"Tung Chou, Edoardo Persichetti, Paolo Santini","doi":"10.1007/s10623-025-01576-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Given two linear codes, the code equivalence problem asks to find an isometry mapping one code into the other. The problem can be described in terms of group actions and, as such, finds a natural application in signatures derived from a Zero-Knowledge Proof system. A recent paper, presented at Asiacrypt 2023, showed how a proof of equivalence can be significantly compressed by describing how the isometry acts only on an information set. Still, the resulting signatures are far from being optimal, as the size for a witness to this relation is still significantly larger than the theoretical lower bound, which is twice the security parameter. In this paper, we fill this gap and propose a new notion of equivalence, which leads to a drastically reduced witness size. For many cases, the resulting size is exactly the optimal one given by the lower bound. We achieve this by introducing the framework of <i>canonical representatives</i>, that is, representatives for classes of codes which are equivalent under some notion of equivalence. We propose new notions of equivalence which encompass and further extend all the existing ones: this allows to identify broader classes of equivalent codes, for which the equivalence can be proved with a very compact witness. We associate these new notions to a specific problem, called Canonical Form Linear Equivalence Problem (CF-LEP), which we show to be as hard as the original one (when random codes are considered), providing reductions in both ways. As an added consequence, this reduction leads to a new solver for the code equivalence problem, which is the fastest solver when the finite field size is large enough. Finally, we show that our framework yields a remarkable reduction in signature size when compared to the LESS submission. Our variant is able to obtain very compact signatures, around 2 KB or less, which are among the smallest in the code-based setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11130,"journal":{"name":"Designs, Codes and Cryptography","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On linear equivalence, canonical forms, and digital signatures\",\"authors\":\"Tung Chou, Edoardo Persichetti, Paolo Santini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10623-025-01576-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Given two linear codes, the code equivalence problem asks to find an isometry mapping one code into the other. The problem can be described in terms of group actions and, as such, finds a natural application in signatures derived from a Zero-Knowledge Proof system. A recent paper, presented at Asiacrypt 2023, showed how a proof of equivalence can be significantly compressed by describing how the isometry acts only on an information set. Still, the resulting signatures are far from being optimal, as the size for a witness to this relation is still significantly larger than the theoretical lower bound, which is twice the security parameter. In this paper, we fill this gap and propose a new notion of equivalence, which leads to a drastically reduced witness size. For many cases, the resulting size is exactly the optimal one given by the lower bound. We achieve this by introducing the framework of <i>canonical representatives</i>, that is, representatives for classes of codes which are equivalent under some notion of equivalence. We propose new notions of equivalence which encompass and further extend all the existing ones: this allows to identify broader classes of equivalent codes, for which the equivalence can be proved with a very compact witness. We associate these new notions to a specific problem, called Canonical Form Linear Equivalence Problem (CF-LEP), which we show to be as hard as the original one (when random codes are considered), providing reductions in both ways. As an added consequence, this reduction leads to a new solver for the code equivalence problem, which is the fastest solver when the finite field size is large enough. Finally, we show that our framework yields a remarkable reduction in signature size when compared to the LESS submission. Our variant is able to obtain very compact signatures, around 2 KB or less, which are among the smallest in the code-based setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Designs, Codes and Cryptography\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Designs, Codes and Cryptography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-025-01576-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designs, Codes and Cryptography","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10623-025-01576-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

给定两个线性码,码等价问题要求找到一个码到另一个码的等距映射。这个问题可以用群体行为来描述,因此,在零知识证明系统的签名中找到了一个自然的应用。最近在Asiacrypt 2023上发表的一篇论文展示了如何通过描述等距如何仅作用于信息集来显著压缩等价证明。尽管如此,所得到的签名远不是最优的,因为这种关系的见证人的大小仍然明显大于理论下界,这是安全参数的两倍。在本文中,我们填补了这一空白,并提出了一个新的等效概念,从而大大减少了见证大小。在许多情况下,结果大小正好是由下界给出的最优大小。我们通过引入正则表示的框架来实现这一点,正则表示是在某些等价概念下等价的码类的表示。我们提出了新的等价概念,它包含并进一步扩展了所有现有的等价概念:这允许识别更广泛的等价码类,对于这些等价可以用一个非常紧凑的见证来证明。我们将这些新概念与一个特定的问题联系起来,称为规范形式线性等价问题(CF-LEP),我们证明它与原始问题一样难(当考虑随机代码时),提供两种方式的约简。作为一个额外的结果,这种减少导致了代码等效问题的新求解器,当有限域大小足够大时,它是最快的求解器。最后,我们展示了与LESS提交相比,我们的框架显著减少了签名大小。我们的变体能够获得非常紧凑的签名,大约2 KB或更少,这是基于代码的设置中最小的签名之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On linear equivalence, canonical forms, and digital signatures

Given two linear codes, the code equivalence problem asks to find an isometry mapping one code into the other. The problem can be described in terms of group actions and, as such, finds a natural application in signatures derived from a Zero-Knowledge Proof system. A recent paper, presented at Asiacrypt 2023, showed how a proof of equivalence can be significantly compressed by describing how the isometry acts only on an information set. Still, the resulting signatures are far from being optimal, as the size for a witness to this relation is still significantly larger than the theoretical lower bound, which is twice the security parameter. In this paper, we fill this gap and propose a new notion of equivalence, which leads to a drastically reduced witness size. For many cases, the resulting size is exactly the optimal one given by the lower bound. We achieve this by introducing the framework of canonical representatives, that is, representatives for classes of codes which are equivalent under some notion of equivalence. We propose new notions of equivalence which encompass and further extend all the existing ones: this allows to identify broader classes of equivalent codes, for which the equivalence can be proved with a very compact witness. We associate these new notions to a specific problem, called Canonical Form Linear Equivalence Problem (CF-LEP), which we show to be as hard as the original one (when random codes are considered), providing reductions in both ways. As an added consequence, this reduction leads to a new solver for the code equivalence problem, which is the fastest solver when the finite field size is large enough. Finally, we show that our framework yields a remarkable reduction in signature size when compared to the LESS submission. Our variant is able to obtain very compact signatures, around 2 KB or less, which are among the smallest in the code-based setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Designs, Codes and Cryptography
Designs, Codes and Cryptography 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
16.5 months
期刊介绍: Designs, Codes and Cryptography is an archival peer-reviewed technical journal publishing original research papers in the designated areas. There is a great deal of activity in design theory, coding theory and cryptography, including a substantial amount of research which brings together more than one of the subjects. While many journals exist for each of the individual areas, few encourage the interaction of the disciplines. The journal was founded to meet the needs of mathematicians, engineers and computer scientists working in these areas, whose interests extend beyond the bounds of any one of the individual disciplines. The journal provides a forum for high quality research in its three areas, with papers touching more than one of the areas especially welcome. The journal also considers high quality submissions in the closely related areas of finite fields and finite geometries, which provide important tools for both the construction and the actual application of designs, codes and cryptographic systems. In particular, it includes (mostly theoretical) papers on computational aspects of finite fields. It also considers topics in sequence design, which frequently admit equivalent formulations in the journal’s main areas. Designs, Codes and Cryptography is mathematically oriented, emphasizing the algebraic and geometric aspects of the areas it covers. The journal considers high quality papers of both a theoretical and a practical nature, provided they contain a substantial amount of mathematics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信