对东欧和中亚地区终止结核病多部门问责框架的看法:一项混合方法研究。

Yuliya Chorna, Ievgeniia-Galyna Lukash, Yuliia Kalancha, Lesia Tonkonoh, Marifat Abdullaeva, Malik Adenov, Mariia Chuprynska, Sayohat Hasanova, Oxana Ibragimova, Panagul Jazybekova, Nataliia Kamenska, Olya Klymenko, Iryna Koroieva, Lyubov Kravets, Nataliia Kryshtafovych, Lucia Pirtina, Alena Skrahina, Yana Terleeva, Valentina Vilc, Hanna Zakrevska, Dmitry Zhurkin, James Malar, Amrita Daftary
{"title":"对东欧和中亚地区终止结核病多部门问责框架的看法:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Yuliya Chorna, Ievgeniia-Galyna Lukash, Yuliia Kalancha, Lesia Tonkonoh, Marifat Abdullaeva, Malik Adenov, Mariia Chuprynska, Sayohat Hasanova, Oxana Ibragimova, Panagul Jazybekova, Nataliia Kamenska, Olya Klymenko, Iryna Koroieva, Lyubov Kravets, Nataliia Kryshtafovych, Lucia Pirtina, Alena Skrahina, Yana Terleeva, Valentina Vilc, Hanna Zakrevska, Dmitry Zhurkin, James Malar, Amrita Daftary","doi":"10.1186/s44263-025-00136-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sectors beyond health are essential to combatting a social disease such as tuberculosis (TB). The engagement of the community and civil society sector in Eastern Europe and Central Asia was assessed as part of a broader baseline assessment of multisectoral engagement in national TB responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods community-based study. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups were conducted online with TB-engaged community and civil society representatives in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, and Ukraine from January to June 2021. Quantitative data, analyzed using descriptive statistics, were triangulated with thematic qualitative analysis. A multisectoral accountability framework and community, rights, and gender framework for TB were used to triangulate the findings and inform data interpretations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 160) included leads, service providers from 74 organizations, and TB survivors. Of 53 survey respondents, most (n = 41, 77·4%) indicated strong/complete agreement to participating in TB service delivery and gender, stigma, and/or legal assessments (n = 27, 50·9%) and research processes (n = 30, 56·6%). However, few indicated inclusion in operational planning and budgeting (n = 13, 24·5%), or political and program impact of community-led monitoring (n = 16, 30·2%), and almost none (n = 2, 3.8%) confirmed dedicated budgets for their TB-related work. Inquiry into the dimensions and criteria for multisectoral actions and accountability revealed their key, yet limited, role in attending to social determinants, with wider engagement hindered by precarious funding. Several organizations balanced building partnerships with other sectors engaged in the TB response against advocacy activities. Inherent obligations toward TB-affected communities were at times overshadowed by obligations to donors and state actors. Coordinating bodies for donor funds, which were multisectoral by design, presented an opportunity to bolster accountability actions within the TB response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multisectoral engagement and accountability for TB are a laudable and necessary goal to end TB. Sustainable mechanisms to support the meaningful involvement of TB-affected communities and civil society are needed, particularly in the context of donor transitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives on multisectoral accountability framework to end tuberculosis in the Eastern Europe and Central Asia region: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuliya Chorna, Ievgeniia-Galyna Lukash, Yuliia Kalancha, Lesia Tonkonoh, Marifat Abdullaeva, Malik Adenov, Mariia Chuprynska, Sayohat Hasanova, Oxana Ibragimova, Panagul Jazybekova, Nataliia Kamenska, Olya Klymenko, Iryna Koroieva, Lyubov Kravets, Nataliia Kryshtafovych, Lucia Pirtina, Alena Skrahina, Yana Terleeva, Valentina Vilc, Hanna Zakrevska, Dmitry Zhurkin, James Malar, Amrita Daftary\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44263-025-00136-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sectors beyond health are essential to combatting a social disease such as tuberculosis (TB). The engagement of the community and civil society sector in Eastern Europe and Central Asia was assessed as part of a broader baseline assessment of multisectoral engagement in national TB responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods community-based study. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups were conducted online with TB-engaged community and civil society representatives in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, and Ukraine from January to June 2021. Quantitative data, analyzed using descriptive statistics, were triangulated with thematic qualitative analysis. A multisectoral accountability framework and community, rights, and gender framework for TB were used to triangulate the findings and inform data interpretations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (n = 160) included leads, service providers from 74 organizations, and TB survivors. Of 53 survey respondents, most (n = 41, 77·4%) indicated strong/complete agreement to participating in TB service delivery and gender, stigma, and/or legal assessments (n = 27, 50·9%) and research processes (n = 30, 56·6%). However, few indicated inclusion in operational planning and budgeting (n = 13, 24·5%), or political and program impact of community-led monitoring (n = 16, 30·2%), and almost none (n = 2, 3.8%) confirmed dedicated budgets for their TB-related work. Inquiry into the dimensions and criteria for multisectoral actions and accountability revealed their key, yet limited, role in attending to social determinants, with wider engagement hindered by precarious funding. Several organizations balanced building partnerships with other sectors engaged in the TB response against advocacy activities. Inherent obligations toward TB-affected communities were at times overshadowed by obligations to donors and state actors. Coordinating bodies for donor funds, which were multisectoral by design, presented an opportunity to bolster accountability actions within the TB response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multisectoral engagement and accountability for TB are a laudable and necessary goal to end TB. Sustainable mechanisms to support the meaningful involvement of TB-affected communities and civil society are needed, particularly in the context of donor transitions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884184/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00136-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00136-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卫生部门以外的部门对于防治结核病等社会疾病至关重要。对东欧和中亚社区和民间社会部门的参与情况进行了评估,作为国家结核病应对多部门参与情况更广泛基线评估的一部分。方法:这是一项基于社区的混合方法研究。2021年1月至6月,在白俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦、摩尔多瓦、塔吉克斯坦和乌克兰与结核病有关的社区和民间社会代表进行了在线调查、访谈和焦点小组讨论。定量数据采用描述性统计进行分析,并采用专题定性分析进行三角测量。采用多部门结核病问责框架和社区、权利和性别框架对调查结果进行三角测量,并为数据解释提供信息。结果:参与者(n = 160)包括74个组织的领导、服务提供者和结核病幸存者。在53名调查对象中,大多数(n = 41, 77.4%)表示强烈/完全同意参与结核病服务提供和性别、污名化和/或法律评估(n = 27, 50.9%)以及研究过程(n = 30, 56.6%)。然而,很少有人表示将其纳入业务规划和预算(n = 13,24.5%),或将社区主导的监测纳入政治和规划影响(n = 16,30.2%),几乎没有人(n = 2,3.8%)确认将其结核病相关工作纳入专门预算。对多部门行动和问责制的维度和标准的调查显示,它们在关注社会决定因素方面发挥了关键但有限的作用,资金不稳定阻碍了更广泛的参与。一些组织在与参与结核病应对的其他部门建立伙伴关系与开展宣传活动之间取得了平衡。对受结核病影响社区的固有义务有时被对捐助者和国家行为体的义务所掩盖。捐助资金协调机构的设计是多部门的,这为加强结核病应对工作中的问责行动提供了机会。结论:结核病的多部门参与和问责制是终结结核病的一个值得称赞和必要的目标。需要可持续的机制来支持受结核病影响的社区和民间社会的有意义参与,特别是在捐助者过渡的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives on multisectoral accountability framework to end tuberculosis in the Eastern Europe and Central Asia region: a mixed-methods study.

Background: Sectors beyond health are essential to combatting a social disease such as tuberculosis (TB). The engagement of the community and civil society sector in Eastern Europe and Central Asia was assessed as part of a broader baseline assessment of multisectoral engagement in national TB responses.

Methods: This was a mixed-methods community-based study. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups were conducted online with TB-engaged community and civil society representatives in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, and Ukraine from January to June 2021. Quantitative data, analyzed using descriptive statistics, were triangulated with thematic qualitative analysis. A multisectoral accountability framework and community, rights, and gender framework for TB were used to triangulate the findings and inform data interpretations.

Results: Participants (n = 160) included leads, service providers from 74 organizations, and TB survivors. Of 53 survey respondents, most (n = 41, 77·4%) indicated strong/complete agreement to participating in TB service delivery and gender, stigma, and/or legal assessments (n = 27, 50·9%) and research processes (n = 30, 56·6%). However, few indicated inclusion in operational planning and budgeting (n = 13, 24·5%), or political and program impact of community-led monitoring (n = 16, 30·2%), and almost none (n = 2, 3.8%) confirmed dedicated budgets for their TB-related work. Inquiry into the dimensions and criteria for multisectoral actions and accountability revealed their key, yet limited, role in attending to social determinants, with wider engagement hindered by precarious funding. Several organizations balanced building partnerships with other sectors engaged in the TB response against advocacy activities. Inherent obligations toward TB-affected communities were at times overshadowed by obligations to donors and state actors. Coordinating bodies for donor funds, which were multisectoral by design, presented an opportunity to bolster accountability actions within the TB response.

Conclusions: Multisectoral engagement and accountability for TB are a laudable and necessary goal to end TB. Sustainable mechanisms to support the meaningful involvement of TB-affected communities and civil society are needed, particularly in the context of donor transitions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信