{"title":"全科医生预约系统模式:3480例英国实践的聚类分析。","authors":"James Scuffell, Stevo Durbaba","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to increasing demand for appointments, UK general practices have adopted a range of appointment systems. These systems vary widely in implementation. These changes have not yet been clearly described.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To characterise patterns of primary care delivery in English general practices.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Cross-sectional study using NHS Appointments in General Practice data from 3480 English GP practices, totalling 56 million appointments between August and October 2023.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve measures associated with consultation modality, waiting time, clinician type, and triage use were derived. Practices with similar characteristics for those 12 variables were clustered together using an ensemble machine learning approach. Clustering was validated using December 2023 data. The characteristics of each practice grouping were described using 2021 Census and NHS workforce data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main models of care emerged. 'Routine care' practices (<i>n</i> = 2286) tended towards face-to-face appointments, often delivered by non-GPs with longer wait times. 'Same-day care' (<i>n</i> = 1194) practices, a third of practices, were more likely to use telephone consultations, deliver care with GPs, and provide same-day appointments. Compared with 'routine care' practices, 'same-day care' practices were more likely to be in urban areas, had younger populations (mean age 40 years versus 41 years) and employed fewer patient-facing staff in extended roles (all clinical staff except doctors and nurses) (2.0 versus 2.5 full-time equivalents per 10 000 patients registered).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified two dominant models of primary care delivery in England, reflecting differing approaches to managing patient access. These differences could have an impact on continuity of care and equity of access to primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e541-e548"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns in GP appointment systems: a cluster analysis of 3480 English practices.\",\"authors\":\"James Scuffell, Stevo Durbaba\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to increasing demand for appointments, UK general practices have adopted a range of appointment systems. These systems vary widely in implementation. These changes have not yet been clearly described.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To characterise patterns of primary care delivery in English general practices.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Cross-sectional study using NHS Appointments in General Practice data from 3480 English GP practices, totalling 56 million appointments between August and October 2023.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twelve measures associated with consultation modality, waiting time, clinician type, and triage use were derived. Practices with similar characteristics for those 12 variables were clustered together using an ensemble machine learning approach. Clustering was validated using December 2023 data. The characteristics of each practice grouping were described using 2021 Census and NHS workforce data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main models of care emerged. 'Routine care' practices (<i>n</i> = 2286) tended towards face-to-face appointments, often delivered by non-GPs with longer wait times. 'Same-day care' (<i>n</i> = 1194) practices, a third of practices, were more likely to use telephone consultations, deliver care with GPs, and provide same-day appointments. Compared with 'routine care' practices, 'same-day care' practices were more likely to be in urban areas, had younger populations (mean age 40 years versus 41 years) and employed fewer patient-facing staff in extended roles (all clinical staff except doctors and nurses) (2.0 versus 2.5 full-time equivalents per 10 000 patients registered).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified two dominant models of primary care delivery in England, reflecting differing approaches to managing patient access. These differences could have an impact on continuity of care and equity of access to primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e541-e548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0556\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patterns in GP appointment systems: a cluster analysis of 3480 English practices.
Background: In response to increasing demand for appointments, UK general practices have adopted a range of appointment systems. These systems vary widely in implementation. These changes have not yet been clearly described.
Aim: To characterise patterns of primary care delivery in English general practices.
Design and setting: Cross-sectional study using NHS Appointments in General Practice data from 3480 English GP practices, totalling 56 million appointments between August and October 2023.
Method: Twelve measures associated with consultation modality, waiting time, clinician type, and triage use were derived. Practices with similar characteristics for those 12 variables were clustered together using an ensemble machine learning approach. Clustering was validated using December 2023 data. The characteristics of each practice grouping were described using 2021 Census and NHS workforce data.
Results: Two main models of care emerged. 'Routine care' practices (n = 2286) tended towards face-to-face appointments, often delivered by non-GPs with longer wait times. 'Same-day care' (n = 1194) practices, a third of practices, were more likely to use telephone consultations, deliver care with GPs, and provide same-day appointments. Compared with 'routine care' practices, 'same-day care' practices were more likely to be in urban areas, had younger populations (mean age 40 years versus 41 years) and employed fewer patient-facing staff in extended roles (all clinical staff except doctors and nurses) (2.0 versus 2.5 full-time equivalents per 10 000 patients registered).
Conclusion: This study identified two dominant models of primary care delivery in England, reflecting differing approaches to managing patient access. These differences could have an impact on continuity of care and equity of access to primary care.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.