Martijn C Schut, Torec T Luik, Iacopo Vagliano, Miguel Rios, Charles W Helsper, Kristel M van Asselt, Niek de Wit, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Henk Cpm van Weert
{"title":"利用人工智能从全科医生的临床笔记中早期发现肺癌。","authors":"Martijn C Schut, Torec T Luik, Iacopo Vagliano, Miguel Rios, Charles W Helsper, Kristel M van Asselt, Niek de Wit, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Henk Cpm van Weert","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2023.0489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The journey of >80% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer starts in general practice. About 75% of patients are diagnosed when it is at an advanced stage (3 or 4), leading to >80% mortality within 1 year at present. The long-term data in GP records might contain hidden information that could be used for earlier case finding of patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop new prediction tools that improve the risk assessment for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Text analysis of electronic patient data using natural language processing and machine learning in the general practice files of four networks in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Files of 525 526 patients were analysed, of whom 2386 were diagnosed with lung cancer. Diagnoses were validated by using the Dutch cancer registry, and both structured and free-text data were used to predict the diagnosis of lung cancer 5 months before diagnosis (4 months before referral).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm could facilitate earlier detection of lung cancer using routine general practice data. Discrimination, calibration, sensitivity, and specificity were established under various cut-off points of the prediction 5 months before diagnosis. Internal validation of the best model demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86 to 0.89), which shrunk to 0.79 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.80) during external validation. The desired sensitivity determines the number of patients to be referred to detect one patient with lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Artificial intelligence-based support enables earlier detection of lung cancer in general practice using readily available text in the patient files of GPs, but needs additional prospective clinical evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e316-e322"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence for early detection of lung cancer in GPs' clinical notes: a retrospective observational cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Martijn C Schut, Torec T Luik, Iacopo Vagliano, Miguel Rios, Charles W Helsper, Kristel M van Asselt, Niek de Wit, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Henk Cpm van Weert\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2023.0489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The journey of >80% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer starts in general practice. About 75% of patients are diagnosed when it is at an advanced stage (3 or 4), leading to >80% mortality within 1 year at present. The long-term data in GP records might contain hidden information that could be used for earlier case finding of patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop new prediction tools that improve the risk assessment for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Text analysis of electronic patient data using natural language processing and machine learning in the general practice files of four networks in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Files of 525 526 patients were analysed, of whom 2386 were diagnosed with lung cancer. Diagnoses were validated by using the Dutch cancer registry, and both structured and free-text data were used to predict the diagnosis of lung cancer 5 months before diagnosis (4 months before referral).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm could facilitate earlier detection of lung cancer using routine general practice data. Discrimination, calibration, sensitivity, and specificity were established under various cut-off points of the prediction 5 months before diagnosis. Internal validation of the best model demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86 to 0.89), which shrunk to 0.79 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.80) during external validation. The desired sensitivity determines the number of patients to be referred to detect one patient with lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Artificial intelligence-based support enables earlier detection of lung cancer in general practice using readily available text in the patient files of GPs, but needs additional prospective clinical evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e316-e322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040367/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0489\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0489","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence for early detection of lung cancer in GPs' clinical notes: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Background: The journey of >80% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer starts in general practice. About 75% of patients are diagnosed when it is at an advanced stage (3 or 4), leading to >80% mortality within 1 year at present. The long-term data in GP records might contain hidden information that could be used for earlier case finding of patients with cancer.
Aim: To develop new prediction tools that improve the risk assessment for lung cancer.
Design and setting: Text analysis of electronic patient data using natural language processing and machine learning in the general practice files of four networks in the Netherlands.
Method: Files of 525 526 patients were analysed, of whom 2386 were diagnosed with lung cancer. Diagnoses were validated by using the Dutch cancer registry, and both structured and free-text data were used to predict the diagnosis of lung cancer 5 months before diagnosis (4 months before referral).
Results: The algorithm could facilitate earlier detection of lung cancer using routine general practice data. Discrimination, calibration, sensitivity, and specificity were established under various cut-off points of the prediction 5 months before diagnosis. Internal validation of the best model demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86 to 0.89), which shrunk to 0.79 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.80) during external validation. The desired sensitivity determines the number of patients to be referred to detect one patient with lung cancer.
Conclusion: Artificial intelligence-based support enables earlier detection of lung cancer in general practice using readily available text in the patient files of GPs, but needs additional prospective clinical evaluation.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide.
BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.