遗传学、初级保健记录和生活方式因素对结直肠癌短期动态风险预测的影响:英国生物银行无症状和有症状参与者的前瞻性研究

BMJ oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000336
Samantha Ip, Hannah Harrison, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Matthew E Barclay, Jonathan Tyrer, Joe Dennis, Xin Yang, Michael Lush, Cristina Renzi, Nora Pashayan, Spiros Denaxas, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Antonis C Antoniou, Angela M Wood
{"title":"遗传学、初级保健记录和生活方式因素对结直肠癌短期动态风险预测的影响:英国生物银行无症状和有症状参与者的前瞻性研究","authors":"Samantha Ip, Hannah Harrison, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Matthew E Barclay, Jonathan Tyrer, Joe Dennis, Xin Yang, Michael Lush, Cristina Renzi, Nora Pashayan, Spiros Denaxas, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Antonis C Antoniou, Angela M Wood","doi":"10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify the contributions of polygenic scores, primary care records (presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) and lifestyle factors, for short-term risk prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) in general and symptomatic individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This prospective cohort study used data from the UK Biobank with follow-up until 2018. It included 160 507 participants with linked primary care records and a subcohort of 42 782 participants with recent CRC-related symptoms. The outcome was the first-recorded CRC diagnosis within 2 years. Dynamic risk models with time-varying predictors were derived using a super-landmark framework. Model discrimination was assessed through Harrel's C-index, and predictor contributions to model discrimination were evaluated using inclusion-order-agnostic Shapley values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C-indices (95% CIs) were 0.73 (0.72 to 0.73) and 0.69 (0.68 to 0.70) for the general and symptomatic participants, respectively. Shapley contributions to model discrimination (95% CIs) were core predictors (eg, age, sex) 33% (25% to 42%) (symptomatic: 34% (9% to 75%)), polygenic scores 16% (8% to 26%) (8% (-21% to 35%)), primary care blood tests 32% (19% to 43%) (41% (16% to 73%)), medical history 11% (4% to 17%) (9% (-25% to 37%)), lifestyle factors 6% (0% to 11%) (-5% (-32% to 13.4%)) and symptoms 3% (-2% to 7%) (13% (-19% to 41%)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Polygenic scores contribute substantially to short-term risk prediction for CRC in both general and symptomatic populations; however, the contribution of information in primary care records (including presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) is greater. Lifestyle factors not routinely collected in primary care contribute minimally.</p>","PeriodicalId":72436,"journal":{"name":"BMJ oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetics, primary care records and lifestyle factors for short-term dynamic risk prediction of colorectal cancer: prospective study of asymptomatic and symptomatic UK Biobank participants.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Ip, Hannah Harrison, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Matthew E Barclay, Jonathan Tyrer, Joe Dennis, Xin Yang, Michael Lush, Cristina Renzi, Nora Pashayan, Spiros Denaxas, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Antonis C Antoniou, Angela M Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify the contributions of polygenic scores, primary care records (presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) and lifestyle factors, for short-term risk prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) in general and symptomatic individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This prospective cohort study used data from the UK Biobank with follow-up until 2018. It included 160 507 participants with linked primary care records and a subcohort of 42 782 participants with recent CRC-related symptoms. The outcome was the first-recorded CRC diagnosis within 2 years. Dynamic risk models with time-varying predictors were derived using a super-landmark framework. Model discrimination was assessed through Harrel's C-index, and predictor contributions to model discrimination were evaluated using inclusion-order-agnostic Shapley values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C-indices (95% CIs) were 0.73 (0.72 to 0.73) and 0.69 (0.68 to 0.70) for the general and symptomatic participants, respectively. Shapley contributions to model discrimination (95% CIs) were core predictors (eg, age, sex) 33% (25% to 42%) (symptomatic: 34% (9% to 75%)), polygenic scores 16% (8% to 26%) (8% (-21% to 35%)), primary care blood tests 32% (19% to 43%) (41% (16% to 73%)), medical history 11% (4% to 17%) (9% (-25% to 37%)), lifestyle factors 6% (0% to 11%) (-5% (-32% to 13.4%)) and symptoms 3% (-2% to 7%) (13% (-19% to 41%)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Polygenic scores contribute substantially to short-term risk prediction for CRC in both general and symptomatic populations; however, the contribution of information in primary care records (including presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) is greater. Lifestyle factors not routinely collected in primary care contribute minimally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ oncology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"e000336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11880779/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:量化多基因评分、初级保健记录(表现症状、病史和常见血液检查)和生活方式因素对一般和有症状个体结肠直肠癌(CRC)短期风险预测的贡献。方法和分析:这项前瞻性队列研究使用了英国生物银行的数据,随访至2018年。该研究包括160 507名具有相关初级保健记录的参与者和42 782名近期出现crc相关症状的参与者。结果是2年内首次记录的CRC诊断。采用超地标框架建立了具有时变预测因子的动态风险模型。通过Harrel's c指数评估模型歧视,并使用包含顺序不可知论的Shapley值评估预测因子对模型歧视的贡献。结果:c -指数(95% ci)为0.73(0.72 ~ 0.73)和0.69(0.68 ~ 0.70)。Shapley对模型歧视(95% ci)的贡献是核心预测因素(如年龄、性别)33%(25%至42%)(症状:34%(9%至75%)),多基因评分16%(8%至26%)(8%(-21%至35%)),初级保健血液检查32%(19%至43%)(41%(16%至73%)),病史11%(4%至17%)(9%(-25%至37%)),生活方式因素6%(0%至11%)(-5%(-32%至13.4%))和症状3%(-2%至7%)(13%(-19%至41%))。结论:多基因评分对一般人群和有症状人群的CRC短期风险预测都有重要贡献;然而,初级保健记录(包括表现症状、病史和普通血液检查)中的信息贡献更大。在初级保健中未常规收集的生活方式因素影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genetics, primary care records and lifestyle factors for short-term dynamic risk prediction of colorectal cancer: prospective study of asymptomatic and symptomatic UK Biobank participants.

Objectives: To quantify the contributions of polygenic scores, primary care records (presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) and lifestyle factors, for short-term risk prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) in general and symptomatic individuals.

Methods and analysis: This prospective cohort study used data from the UK Biobank with follow-up until 2018. It included 160 507 participants with linked primary care records and a subcohort of 42 782 participants with recent CRC-related symptoms. The outcome was the first-recorded CRC diagnosis within 2 years. Dynamic risk models with time-varying predictors were derived using a super-landmark framework. Model discrimination was assessed through Harrel's C-index, and predictor contributions to model discrimination were evaluated using inclusion-order-agnostic Shapley values.

Results: C-indices (95% CIs) were 0.73 (0.72 to 0.73) and 0.69 (0.68 to 0.70) for the general and symptomatic participants, respectively. Shapley contributions to model discrimination (95% CIs) were core predictors (eg, age, sex) 33% (25% to 42%) (symptomatic: 34% (9% to 75%)), polygenic scores 16% (8% to 26%) (8% (-21% to 35%)), primary care blood tests 32% (19% to 43%) (41% (16% to 73%)), medical history 11% (4% to 17%) (9% (-25% to 37%)), lifestyle factors 6% (0% to 11%) (-5% (-32% to 13.4%)) and symptoms 3% (-2% to 7%) (13% (-19% to 41%)).

Conclusions: Polygenic scores contribute substantially to short-term risk prediction for CRC in both general and symptomatic populations; however, the contribution of information in primary care records (including presenting symptoms, medical history and common blood tests) is greater. Lifestyle factors not routinely collected in primary care contribute minimally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信