启发式方法:反对迷幻药的共识定义。

Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2023-12-13 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1089/psymed.2023.0031
Lauren Lepow, Hope Kronman, Rachel Yehuda
{"title":"启发式方法:反对迷幻药的共识定义。","authors":"Lauren Lepow, Hope Kronman, Rachel Yehuda","doi":"10.1089/psymed.2023.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The field of psychedelic research and therapy is growing at an unprecedented rate, as is the need for shared terminology to allow for coherent conversations about these medicines. However, proclaiming consensus definitions at the present time may be a premature closure, limiting the possibility of what psychedelics can teach about the mind and brain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our goal in this piece is to weigh the risks and benefits of proclaiming a consensus definition and suggest as an alternative a framework for the way data and knowledge are acquired about psychedelic medicines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose that psychedelics be thought of as heuristic tools, directing scientists to further investigate and form novel theories about the mind-brain. The advent of the modern tools of data science makes it possible to heuristically characterize the vast landscape of psychedelic variables-molecular biology, physiology, phenomenology, psychology, ceremony, and more. Instead of prematurely proclaiming consensus, the psychedelic field can use modern computational tools to iteratively reapproach definitions and categories, rendering them more rigorous and reproducible.</p>","PeriodicalId":74590,"journal":{"name":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"1 4","pages":"190-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Heuristic Approach: Against Consensus Definitions of Psychedelics.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Lepow, Hope Kronman, Rachel Yehuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/psymed.2023.0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The field of psychedelic research and therapy is growing at an unprecedented rate, as is the need for shared terminology to allow for coherent conversations about these medicines. However, proclaiming consensus definitions at the present time may be a premature closure, limiting the possibility of what psychedelics can teach about the mind and brain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our goal in this piece is to weigh the risks and benefits of proclaiming a consensus definition and suggest as an alternative a framework for the way data and knowledge are acquired about psychedelic medicines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose that psychedelics be thought of as heuristic tools, directing scientists to further investigate and form novel theories about the mind-brain. The advent of the modern tools of data science makes it possible to heuristically characterize the vast landscape of psychedelic variables-molecular biology, physiology, phenomenology, psychology, ceremony, and more. Instead of prematurely proclaiming consensus, the psychedelic field can use modern computational tools to iteratively reapproach definitions and categories, rendering them more rigorous and reproducible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"190-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658663/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/psymed.2023.0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/psymed.2023.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:迷幻药的研究和治疗领域正以前所未有的速度增长,同时也需要共享术语,以便对这些药物进行连贯的讨论。然而,在目前宣布一致的定义可能是一个过早的结束,限制了致幻剂对思想和大脑的教育的可能性。目的:我们在这篇文章中的目标是权衡宣布共识定义的风险和收益,并建议作为一种替代框架,用于获取有关致幻剂的数据和知识。结论:我们建议将致幻剂视为启发式工具,指导科学家进一步研究并形成关于心智-大脑的新理论。现代数据科学工具的出现,使得启发式地描绘迷幻变量的广阔图景成为可能——分子生物学、生理学、现象学、心理学、仪式等等。迷幻领域可以使用现代计算工具迭代地重新处理定义和类别,而不是过早地宣布共识,从而使它们更加严格和可重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Heuristic Approach: Against Consensus Definitions of Psychedelics.

Introduction: The field of psychedelic research and therapy is growing at an unprecedented rate, as is the need for shared terminology to allow for coherent conversations about these medicines. However, proclaiming consensus definitions at the present time may be a premature closure, limiting the possibility of what psychedelics can teach about the mind and brain.

Objective: Our goal in this piece is to weigh the risks and benefits of proclaiming a consensus definition and suggest as an alternative a framework for the way data and knowledge are acquired about psychedelic medicines.

Conclusions: We propose that psychedelics be thought of as heuristic tools, directing scientists to further investigate and form novel theories about the mind-brain. The advent of the modern tools of data science makes it possible to heuristically characterize the vast landscape of psychedelic variables-molecular biology, physiology, phenomenology, psychology, ceremony, and more. Instead of prematurely proclaiming consensus, the psychedelic field can use modern computational tools to iteratively reapproach definitions and categories, rendering them more rigorous and reproducible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信