林堡语的社会语用代词:从自述自动性、态度和元语言意识推断说话人的能动性。

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Cognitive Linguistics Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1515/cog-2023-0141
Joske Piepers, Ad Backus, Jos Swanenberg
{"title":"林堡语的社会语用代词:从自述自动性、态度和元语言意识推断说话人的能动性。","authors":"Joske Piepers, Ad Backus, Jos Swanenberg","doi":"10.1515/cog-2023-0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How much of everyday language use takes place on autopilot, how much are speakers aware of, and how do their attitudes relate to this? In particular, how do these factors together account for variation between speakers? Limburgian, a regional language within the Netherlands, is under pressure from Dutch in an intensive language contact situation. The use of a non-feminine subject pronoun for women is a Limburgian feature which is not shared with Dutch. Limburgian speakers show a large range of variation regarding this feature, both when it comes to its use, and how it is perceived. By studying speakers' self-reports of three concepts - automaticity, attitudes, and metalinguistic awareness - as well as how these together relate to self-reported language use (<i>N</i> = 405), this paper investigates to what extent speakers have control over their own language use. Our findings suggest that self-reported automaticity is the driving force in the use of the non-feminine pronoun, but also that this autopilot may be curbed by metalinguistic awareness and attitudes. Importantly, speakers vary considerably on all three concepts, highlighting once more that language users are not a monolith, and that individual speakers may react differently in a language contact situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51530,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistics","volume":"36 1","pages":"89-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociopragmatic pronouns in Limburgian: inferring speakers' agency from self-reported automaticity, attitudes, and metalinguistic awareness.\",\"authors\":\"Joske Piepers, Ad Backus, Jos Swanenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cog-2023-0141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How much of everyday language use takes place on autopilot, how much are speakers aware of, and how do their attitudes relate to this? In particular, how do these factors together account for variation between speakers? Limburgian, a regional language within the Netherlands, is under pressure from Dutch in an intensive language contact situation. The use of a non-feminine subject pronoun for women is a Limburgian feature which is not shared with Dutch. Limburgian speakers show a large range of variation regarding this feature, both when it comes to its use, and how it is perceived. By studying speakers' self-reports of three concepts - automaticity, attitudes, and metalinguistic awareness - as well as how these together relate to self-reported language use (<i>N</i> = 405), this paper investigates to what extent speakers have control over their own language use. Our findings suggest that self-reported automaticity is the driving force in the use of the non-feminine pronoun, but also that this autopilot may be curbed by metalinguistic awareness and attitudes. Importantly, speakers vary considerably on all three concepts, highlighting once more that language users are not a monolith, and that individual speakers may react differently in a language contact situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"89-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878271/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2023-0141\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2023-0141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日常语言使用中有多少是自动驾驶的,说话者意识到多少,他们的态度与此有何关系?特别是,这些因素如何共同解释说话者之间的差异?林堡语是荷兰的一种区域语言,在语言接触密集的情况下受到荷兰语的压力。对女性使用非阴性主语代词是林堡语的特点,这与荷兰语不同。林堡语使用者在这个特征上表现出很大的差异,无论是在使用上,还是在如何理解上。通过研究说话者自述的三个概念——自动性、态度和元语言意识——以及它们与自述语言使用的关系(N = 405),本文调查了说话者在多大程度上控制了自己的语言使用。我们的研究结果表明,自我报告的自动性是使用非女性代词的驱动力,但这种自动性也可能受到元语言意识和态度的抑制。重要的是,说话者在这三个概念上有很大的不同,这再次强调了语言使用者不是一个整体,在语言接触的情况下,每个说话者的反应可能不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sociopragmatic pronouns in Limburgian: inferring speakers' agency from self-reported automaticity, attitudes, and metalinguistic awareness.

How much of everyday language use takes place on autopilot, how much are speakers aware of, and how do their attitudes relate to this? In particular, how do these factors together account for variation between speakers? Limburgian, a regional language within the Netherlands, is under pressure from Dutch in an intensive language contact situation. The use of a non-feminine subject pronoun for women is a Limburgian feature which is not shared with Dutch. Limburgian speakers show a large range of variation regarding this feature, both when it comes to its use, and how it is perceived. By studying speakers' self-reports of three concepts - automaticity, attitudes, and metalinguistic awareness - as well as how these together relate to self-reported language use (N = 405), this paper investigates to what extent speakers have control over their own language use. Our findings suggest that self-reported automaticity is the driving force in the use of the non-feminine pronoun, but also that this autopilot may be curbed by metalinguistic awareness and attitudes. Importantly, speakers vary considerably on all three concepts, highlighting once more that language users are not a monolith, and that individual speakers may react differently in a language contact situation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Cognitive Linguistics presents a forum for linguistic research of all kinds on the interaction between language and cognition. The journal focuses on language as an instrument for organizing, processing and conveying information. Cognitive Linguistics is a peer-reviewed journal of international scope and seeks to publish only works that represent a significant advancement to the theory or methods of cognitive linguistics, or that present an unknown or understudied phenomenon. Topics the structural characteristics of natural language categorization (such as prototypicality, cognitive models, metaphor, and imagery); the functional principles of linguistic organization, as illustrated by iconicity; the conceptual interface between syntax and semantics; the experiential background of language-in-use, including the cultural background; the relationship between language and thought, including matters of universality and language specificity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信