{"title":"波斯语版运动和认知功能疲劳量表(P-FSMC)在伊朗多发性硬化症患者中的信度和效度","authors":"Marzeih Heidari, Ghorban Taghizadeh, Seyed Massood Nabavi, Iris-Katharina Penner, Laleh Lajevardi, Malahat Akbarfahimi","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2466716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the psychometric feature of the Persian version of the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (P-FSMC) in Iranian People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 303 PwMS and 102 healthy controls participated. Structural validity was explored using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Construct validity was determined through correlations of P-FSMC with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), besides expected differences in P-FSMC scores and by examining score variations based on disability and depression levels. Fatigue discrimination and diagnostic accuracy between PwMS and healthy controls were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The P-FSMC demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability and high internal consistency. EFA revealed two factors explaining 70.08% of the variance, with good fit model. The P-FSMC showed moderate to high correlations with FSS and FIS and distinguished different levels of disability and depression. The total score discriminated fatigue with 86.7% accuracy, 84.5% sensitivity, and 93.1% specificity. Cut-off scores for mild, moderate, and severe fatigue severity were ≥46, ≥56, and ≥66, respectively, with high sensitivity (81.52-91.42%) and specificity (80.02-99.01%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The P-FSMC is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing fatigue in Iranian PwMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (P-FSMC) in Iranian people with multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Marzeih Heidari, Ghorban Taghizadeh, Seyed Massood Nabavi, Iris-Katharina Penner, Laleh Lajevardi, Malahat Akbarfahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2025.2466716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the psychometric feature of the Persian version of the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (P-FSMC) in Iranian People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 303 PwMS and 102 healthy controls participated. Structural validity was explored using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Construct validity was determined through correlations of P-FSMC with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), besides expected differences in P-FSMC scores and by examining score variations based on disability and depression levels. Fatigue discrimination and diagnostic accuracy between PwMS and healthy controls were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The P-FSMC demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability and high internal consistency. EFA revealed two factors explaining 70.08% of the variance, with good fit model. The P-FSMC showed moderate to high correlations with FSS and FIS and distinguished different levels of disability and depression. The total score discriminated fatigue with 86.7% accuracy, 84.5% sensitivity, and 93.1% specificity. Cut-off scores for mild, moderate, and severe fatigue severity were ≥46, ≥56, and ≥66, respectively, with high sensitivity (81.52-91.42%) and specificity (80.02-99.01%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The P-FSMC is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing fatigue in Iranian PwMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2466716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2466716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (P-FSMC) in Iranian people with multiple sclerosis.
Purpose: This study evaluated the psychometric feature of the Persian version of the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (P-FSMC) in Iranian People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS).
Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 303 PwMS and 102 healthy controls participated. Structural validity was explored using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Construct validity was determined through correlations of P-FSMC with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), besides expected differences in P-FSMC scores and by examining score variations based on disability and depression levels. Fatigue discrimination and diagnostic accuracy between PwMS and healthy controls were evaluated.
Results: The P-FSMC demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability and high internal consistency. EFA revealed two factors explaining 70.08% of the variance, with good fit model. The P-FSMC showed moderate to high correlations with FSS and FIS and distinguished different levels of disability and depression. The total score discriminated fatigue with 86.7% accuracy, 84.5% sensitivity, and 93.1% specificity. Cut-off scores for mild, moderate, and severe fatigue severity were ≥46, ≥56, and ≥66, respectively, with high sensitivity (81.52-91.42%) and specificity (80.02-99.01%).
Conclusions: The P-FSMC is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing fatigue in Iranian PwMS.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.