AHRQ重新设计出院工具包对成人患者30天再入院的影响。

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rhea Anne Yumena
{"title":"AHRQ重新设计出院工具包对成人患者30天再入院的影响。","authors":"Rhea Anne Yumena","doi":"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to determine whether implementing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit would impact 30-day readmissions among adult medical-surgical patients in an urban Arizona hospital over 8 weeks. This quality improvement project aims to address the lack of evidence-based practice (EBP) discharge guidelines at the project site and to improve readmissions by translating research evidence into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Primary practice setting: </strong>The project site is a single medical center within a hospital system located in an urban area of Arizona.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>The medical-surgical nurses utilized the AHRQ RED components in the form of a discharge checklist. Education and staff teaching were conducted at the project site, with stakeholders provided with EBP resource materials, including the AHRQ's RED Toolkit and scientific evidence on how this process can impact hospital 30-day readmissions. This checklist incorporates the 11 RED components of the discharge process. The checklist served as a procedural guide for nurses during discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient data were collected to measure the impact of the AHRQ RED Toolkit on 30-day readmissions. Data were collected from the electronic health record and EBP tool, the AHRQ RED checklist. Thirty-day readmissions were measured as counts in a sample of 307 patients, with data collected before intervention (n = 199) and again after intervention (n = 108). The frequencies of 30-day readmissions were described using counts and percentage rates, then compared using Pearson's chi-square test. In the comparison patient group, there were 99 readmissions (50%) out of 199 patients. In the intervention patient group, 24 patients (22%) out of 108 were readmitted. Pearson's chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference in the number of patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge [X2(1, N = 307) = 22.0; p = .001).</p><p><strong>Implications for case management: </strong>The AHRQ RED components are evidence-based discharge interventions and strategies that have been proven to be crucial in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes. The project results highlight the importance of incorporating EBP guidelines into health care settings and validate the effectiveness of these interventions in bridging gaps in patient care, such as avoidable readmissions. The project outcomes demonstrate the role of the RED components in guiding case managers during a patient's hospital discharge. Applying the RED components was essential in preventing readmissions, thereby influencing health care and case management practices, including ensuring safe discharges, reducing costs, and improving care quality. The project outcomes showed significant improvements in the discharge process, providing opportunities to develop a new discharge protocol. This supports the decision to incorporate this checklist into the standard of care during discharges. Additionally, the positive results open the possibility of integrating the discharge checklist into the electronic health record system for a larger-scale impact. The project outcomes, which are both clinically and statistically significant, can help the case management community consider integrating AHRQ RED components into patient care coordination and discharge planning as patients transition to their homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45015,"journal":{"name":"Professional Case Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of AHRQ Re-Engineered Discharge Toolkit on Adult Patient's 30-Day Readmission.\",\"authors\":\"Rhea Anne Yumena\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to determine whether implementing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit would impact 30-day readmissions among adult medical-surgical patients in an urban Arizona hospital over 8 weeks. This quality improvement project aims to address the lack of evidence-based practice (EBP) discharge guidelines at the project site and to improve readmissions by translating research evidence into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Primary practice setting: </strong>The project site is a single medical center within a hospital system located in an urban area of Arizona.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>The medical-surgical nurses utilized the AHRQ RED components in the form of a discharge checklist. Education and staff teaching were conducted at the project site, with stakeholders provided with EBP resource materials, including the AHRQ's RED Toolkit and scientific evidence on how this process can impact hospital 30-day readmissions. This checklist incorporates the 11 RED components of the discharge process. The checklist served as a procedural guide for nurses during discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient data were collected to measure the impact of the AHRQ RED Toolkit on 30-day readmissions. Data were collected from the electronic health record and EBP tool, the AHRQ RED checklist. Thirty-day readmissions were measured as counts in a sample of 307 patients, with data collected before intervention (n = 199) and again after intervention (n = 108). The frequencies of 30-day readmissions were described using counts and percentage rates, then compared using Pearson's chi-square test. In the comparison patient group, there were 99 readmissions (50%) out of 199 patients. In the intervention patient group, 24 patients (22%) out of 108 were readmitted. Pearson's chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference in the number of patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge [X2(1, N = 307) = 22.0; p = .001).</p><p><strong>Implications for case management: </strong>The AHRQ RED components are evidence-based discharge interventions and strategies that have been proven to be crucial in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes. The project results highlight the importance of incorporating EBP guidelines into health care settings and validate the effectiveness of these interventions in bridging gaps in patient care, such as avoidable readmissions. The project outcomes demonstrate the role of the RED components in guiding case managers during a patient's hospital discharge. Applying the RED components was essential in preventing readmissions, thereby influencing health care and case management practices, including ensuring safe discharges, reducing costs, and improving care quality. The project outcomes showed significant improvements in the discharge process, providing opportunities to develop a new discharge protocol. This supports the decision to incorporate this checklist into the standard of care during discharges. Additionally, the positive results open the possibility of integrating the discharge checklist into the electronic health record system for a larger-scale impact. The project outcomes, which are both clinically and statistically significant, can help the case management community consider integrating AHRQ RED components into patient care coordination and discharge planning as patients transition to their homes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professional Case Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professional Case Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本质量改进(QI)项目的目的是确定实施医疗保健研究和质量机构(AHRQ)重新设计出院(RED)工具包是否会影响亚利桑那州一家城市医院的成人内科-外科患者在8周内30天的再入院率。该质量改进项目旨在解决项目现场缺乏循证实践(EBP)出院指南的问题,并通过将研究证据转化为临床实践来改善再入院率。主要实践环境:项目地点是位于亚利桑那州市区的医院系统内的一个医疗中心。方法和样本:内科-外科护士以出院清单的形式使用AHRQ RED组成部分。在项目现场进行了教育和工作人员教学,向利益相关者提供了EBP资源材料,包括AHRQ的RED工具包,以及关于该过程如何影响医院30天再入院的科学证据。这份清单包含了排放过程中的11个RED组件。该检查表可作为护士出院时的程序指南。结果:收集患者数据以衡量AHRQ RED工具包对30天再入院的影响。数据从电子健康记录和EBP工具(AHRQ RED检查表)中收集。对307例患者样本进行30天再入院计数,并在干预前(n = 199)和干预后(n = 108)再次收集数据。使用计数和百分比描述30天再入院的频率,然后使用Pearson卡方检验进行比较。在对照组中,199例患者中有99例再入院(50%)。在干预组,108例患者中有24例(22%)再次入院。Pearson卡方检验显示,两组患者出院后30天内再入院人数差异有统计学意义[X2(1, N = 307) = 22.0;P = .001)。对病例管理的影响:AHRQ RED组成部分是基于证据的出院干预措施和策略,已被证明对减少再入院和改善患者预后至关重要。项目结果强调了将EBP指南纳入卫生保健环境的重要性,并验证了这些干预措施在弥合患者护理差距方面的有效性,例如可避免的再入院。项目成果证明了RED组成部分在患者出院期间指导病例管理人员的作用。应用RED组成部分对于防止再入院至关重要,从而影响医疗保健和病例管理实践,包括确保安全出院、降低成本和提高护理质量。项目结果表明,排放过程有了显著改善,为制定新的排放方案提供了机会。这支持将该清单纳入出院期间护理标准的决定。此外,积极的结果开启了将出院清单纳入电子健康记录系统的可能性,以产生更大的影响。项目结果在临床和统计上都具有显著意义,可以帮助病例管理界考虑将AHRQ RED组成部分整合到患者护理协调和出院计划中,以帮助患者过渡到他们的家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of AHRQ Re-Engineered Discharge Toolkit on Adult Patient's 30-Day Readmission.

Purpose of study: The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to determine whether implementing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit would impact 30-day readmissions among adult medical-surgical patients in an urban Arizona hospital over 8 weeks. This quality improvement project aims to address the lack of evidence-based practice (EBP) discharge guidelines at the project site and to improve readmissions by translating research evidence into clinical practice.

Primary practice setting: The project site is a single medical center within a hospital system located in an urban area of Arizona.

Methodology and sample: The medical-surgical nurses utilized the AHRQ RED components in the form of a discharge checklist. Education and staff teaching were conducted at the project site, with stakeholders provided with EBP resource materials, including the AHRQ's RED Toolkit and scientific evidence on how this process can impact hospital 30-day readmissions. This checklist incorporates the 11 RED components of the discharge process. The checklist served as a procedural guide for nurses during discharge.

Results: Patient data were collected to measure the impact of the AHRQ RED Toolkit on 30-day readmissions. Data were collected from the electronic health record and EBP tool, the AHRQ RED checklist. Thirty-day readmissions were measured as counts in a sample of 307 patients, with data collected before intervention (n = 199) and again after intervention (n = 108). The frequencies of 30-day readmissions were described using counts and percentage rates, then compared using Pearson's chi-square test. In the comparison patient group, there were 99 readmissions (50%) out of 199 patients. In the intervention patient group, 24 patients (22%) out of 108 were readmitted. Pearson's chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference in the number of patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge [X2(1, N = 307) = 22.0; p = .001).

Implications for case management: The AHRQ RED components are evidence-based discharge interventions and strategies that have been proven to be crucial in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes. The project results highlight the importance of incorporating EBP guidelines into health care settings and validate the effectiveness of these interventions in bridging gaps in patient care, such as avoidable readmissions. The project outcomes demonstrate the role of the RED components in guiding case managers during a patient's hospital discharge. Applying the RED components was essential in preventing readmissions, thereby influencing health care and case management practices, including ensuring safe discharges, reducing costs, and improving care quality. The project outcomes showed significant improvements in the discharge process, providing opportunities to develop a new discharge protocol. This supports the decision to incorporate this checklist into the standard of care during discharges. Additionally, the positive results open the possibility of integrating the discharge checklist into the electronic health record system for a larger-scale impact. The project outcomes, which are both clinically and statistically significant, can help the case management community consider integrating AHRQ RED components into patient care coordination and discharge planning as patients transition to their homes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Professional Case Management
Professional Case Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Professional Case Management: The Leader in Evidence-Based Practice is a peer-reviewed, contemporary journal that crosses all case management settings. The Journal features best practices and industry benchmarks for the professional case manager and also features hands-on information for case managers new to the specialty. Articles focus on the coordination of services, management of payer issues, population- and disease-specific aspects of patient care, efficient use of resources, improving the quality of care/patient safety, data and outcomes analysis, and patient advocacy. The Journal provides practical, hands-on information for day-to-day activities, as well as cutting-edge research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信