将免疫检查点抑制剂的副作用映射到项目库,用于实时副作用监测系统。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julia Lai-Kwon, Michael Jefford, Stephanie Best, Iris Zhang, David Cella, Claire Piccinin, Bryce B Reeve, Claudia Rutherford
{"title":"将免疫检查点抑制剂的副作用映射到项目库,用于实时副作用监测系统。","authors":"Julia Lai-Kwon, Michael Jefford, Stephanie Best, Iris Zhang, David Cella, Claire Piccinin, Bryce B Reeve, Claudia Rutherford","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00855-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring for the side effects of novel therapies using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is critical for ensuring patient safety. Existing static patient-reported outcome measures may not provide adequate coverage of novel side effects. Item libraries provide a flexible approach to monitoring for side effects using customized item lists, but the ideal process for matching side effects to items sourced from multiple item libraries is yet to be established. We sought to develop a pragmatic process for mapping side effects to items from three major item libraries using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) side effects as an example.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a consumer- and clinician-driven list of 36 ICI side effects, two authors independently mapped side effects to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) terms, and then to three item libraries: the Patient-Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Item Library, and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) searchable library. The rates of inter-rater agreement were recorded. Following item collation from the item libraries, we devised criteria for selecting the optimal item for each side effect for inclusion in a future electronic PRO system based on guidance from the above groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 36 side effects mapped to at least one CTCAE term, with eight mapping to more than one term. Twenty-three side effects mapped to at least one PRO-CTCAE term, 35 side effects mapped to at least one EORTC item, and 31 side effects mapped to at least one FACIT item. The inter-rater agreement rate was 100% (PRO-CTCAE), 83% (EORTC) and 75% (FACIT). Pre-determined criteria were applied to select the optimal item for each side effect from the three item libraries, producing a final 61-item list.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using ICI side effects as an example, we developed a pragmatic approach to creating customized item lists from three major item libraries to monitor for side effects of novel therapies in routine care. This process highlighted the challenges of using item libraries and priorities for future work to improve their usability.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping immune checkpoint inhibitor side effects to item libraries for use in real-time side effect monitoring systems.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Lai-Kwon, Michael Jefford, Stephanie Best, Iris Zhang, David Cella, Claire Piccinin, Bryce B Reeve, Claudia Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41687-025-00855-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring for the side effects of novel therapies using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is critical for ensuring patient safety. Existing static patient-reported outcome measures may not provide adequate coverage of novel side effects. Item libraries provide a flexible approach to monitoring for side effects using customized item lists, but the ideal process for matching side effects to items sourced from multiple item libraries is yet to be established. We sought to develop a pragmatic process for mapping side effects to items from three major item libraries using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) side effects as an example.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a consumer- and clinician-driven list of 36 ICI side effects, two authors independently mapped side effects to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) terms, and then to three item libraries: the Patient-Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Item Library, and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) searchable library. The rates of inter-rater agreement were recorded. Following item collation from the item libraries, we devised criteria for selecting the optimal item for each side effect for inclusion in a future electronic PRO system based on guidance from the above groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 36 side effects mapped to at least one CTCAE term, with eight mapping to more than one term. Twenty-three side effects mapped to at least one PRO-CTCAE term, 35 side effects mapped to at least one EORTC item, and 31 side effects mapped to at least one FACIT item. The inter-rater agreement rate was 100% (PRO-CTCAE), 83% (EORTC) and 75% (FACIT). Pre-determined criteria were applied to select the optimal item for each side effect from the three item libraries, producing a final 61-item list.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using ICI side effects as an example, we developed a pragmatic approach to creating customized item lists from three major item libraries to monitor for side effects of novel therapies in routine care. This process highlighted the challenges of using item libraries and priorities for future work to improve their usability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885683/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00855-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00855-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用患者报告结局(pro)监测新疗法的副作用对于确保患者安全至关重要。现有的静态患者报告的结果测量方法可能无法充分覆盖新的副作用。项目库提供了一种灵活的方法来使用定制的项目列表来监控副作用,但是将副作用与来自多个项目库的项目相匹配的理想过程尚未建立。我们以免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)副作用为例,试图开发一种实用的过程,将副作用映射到三个主要项目库中的项目。方法:使用消费者和临床医生驱动的36种ICI副作用列表,两位作者独立地将副作用映射到不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)术语,然后映射到三个项目库:不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的患者报告结局版本,欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)项目库和慢性疾病治疗功能评估(FACIT)可搜索库。记录了评分者之间的协议率。从项目库中进行项目整理后,我们根据上述小组的指导,设计了为每种副作用选择最佳项目的标准,以便在未来的电子PRO系统中纳入。结果:所有36个副作用至少映射到一个CTCAE项,其中8个映射到一个以上的CTCAE项。23个副作用至少映射到一个PRO-CTCAE项目,35个副作用至少映射到一个EORTC项目,31个副作用至少映射到一个FACIT项目。评分间协议率分别为100% (PRO-CTCAE)、83% (EORTC)和75% (FACIT)。预先确定的标准应用于从三个项目库中选择每个副作用的最佳项目,产生最终的61项列表。结论:以ICI副作用为例,我们开发了一种实用的方法,从三个主要的项目库中创建定制的项目列表,以监测常规护理中新疗法的副作用。这个过程突出了使用项目库的挑战和未来工作的优先级,以提高它们的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping immune checkpoint inhibitor side effects to item libraries for use in real-time side effect monitoring systems.

Background: Monitoring for the side effects of novel therapies using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is critical for ensuring patient safety. Existing static patient-reported outcome measures may not provide adequate coverage of novel side effects. Item libraries provide a flexible approach to monitoring for side effects using customized item lists, but the ideal process for matching side effects to items sourced from multiple item libraries is yet to be established. We sought to develop a pragmatic process for mapping side effects to items from three major item libraries using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) side effects as an example.

Methods: Using a consumer- and clinician-driven list of 36 ICI side effects, two authors independently mapped side effects to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) terms, and then to three item libraries: the Patient-Reported Outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Item Library, and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) searchable library. The rates of inter-rater agreement were recorded. Following item collation from the item libraries, we devised criteria for selecting the optimal item for each side effect for inclusion in a future electronic PRO system based on guidance from the above groups.

Results: All 36 side effects mapped to at least one CTCAE term, with eight mapping to more than one term. Twenty-three side effects mapped to at least one PRO-CTCAE term, 35 side effects mapped to at least one EORTC item, and 31 side effects mapped to at least one FACIT item. The inter-rater agreement rate was 100% (PRO-CTCAE), 83% (EORTC) and 75% (FACIT). Pre-determined criteria were applied to select the optimal item for each side effect from the three item libraries, producing a final 61-item list.

Conclusion: Using ICI side effects as an example, we developed a pragmatic approach to creating customized item lists from three major item libraries to monitor for side effects of novel therapies in routine care. This process highlighted the challenges of using item libraries and priorities for future work to improve their usability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信