法国和英国溃疡性结肠炎先进治疗的剂量递增模式和相关费用:回顾性数据库分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S481730
Tamás Treuer, Melissa Richards, Can Mert, Endip Dhesi, Lidia Silva, Yubo Tan, Sami Hoque
{"title":"法国和英国溃疡性结肠炎先进治疗的剂量递增模式和相关费用:回顾性数据库分析。","authors":"Tamás Treuer, Melissa Richards, Can Mert, Endip Dhesi, Lidia Silva, Yubo Tan, Sami Hoque","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S481730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dose escalation to optimize advanced therapies is common in ulcerative colitis (UC) to avoid intra-class or inter-class drug switching and maintain clinical response and has impact on costs. Given the limited real-world data available, this study aims to understand real-world dose escalation UC advanced therapies patterns in France and United Kingdom [UK].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study in adult patients with moderate-to-severe UC starting an advanced UC therapy (adalimumab [ADA], golimumab [GOL], infliximab [IFX], tofacitinib [TOF], ustekinumab [UST], or vedolizumab [VED]) with first prescription (and/or dispensation for France) between January 2017 and February 2022 (ie advanced UC therapy new users, by excluding patients who used any of these drugs in the previous 12 months to their index date). Proportions of patients with dose escalation/de-escalation (±20% versus Summary of Product Characteristics) after maintenance date were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses. Clinical response, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and direct costs related to UC were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 6 months after start of maintenance, rate of at least one dose escalation was 74.1%. Overall, 83.9-89% of patients had dose escalation within the 12-24 months, respectively, and 61.6% had clinical response [ranging from 56.3% (ADA) to 77.0% (IFX)]. Direct annual HRU costs related to UC ranged between 7426 (IFX) EUR and 22,265 (UST) in France, with mean 11,181 EUR in the dose-escalation group vs 8323 EUR in the de-escalation group (+11.5%). In the UK costs ranged between 5006 (ADA) EUR and 11,975 (UST).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dose escalation of UC advanced therapies is a common strategy to avoid treatment-switching. Despite dose escalations and their cost to the system, a proportion of patients fail to achieve clinical response. This study highlights the need for more efficacious, durable treatments for moderate-to-severe UC patients, as the initiation of the advanced therapies did not reduce overall systemic/rectal corticosteroid burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"129-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose Escalation Patterns and Associated Costs of Advanced Therapies for Ulcerative Colitis in France and the United Kingdom: A Retrospective Database Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tamás Treuer, Melissa Richards, Can Mert, Endip Dhesi, Lidia Silva, Yubo Tan, Sami Hoque\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEOR.S481730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dose escalation to optimize advanced therapies is common in ulcerative colitis (UC) to avoid intra-class or inter-class drug switching and maintain clinical response and has impact on costs. Given the limited real-world data available, this study aims to understand real-world dose escalation UC advanced therapies patterns in France and United Kingdom [UK].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study in adult patients with moderate-to-severe UC starting an advanced UC therapy (adalimumab [ADA], golimumab [GOL], infliximab [IFX], tofacitinib [TOF], ustekinumab [UST], or vedolizumab [VED]) with first prescription (and/or dispensation for France) between January 2017 and February 2022 (ie advanced UC therapy new users, by excluding patients who used any of these drugs in the previous 12 months to their index date). Proportions of patients with dose escalation/de-escalation (±20% versus Summary of Product Characteristics) after maintenance date were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses. Clinical response, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and direct costs related to UC were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 6 months after start of maintenance, rate of at least one dose escalation was 74.1%. Overall, 83.9-89% of patients had dose escalation within the 12-24 months, respectively, and 61.6% had clinical response [ranging from 56.3% (ADA) to 77.0% (IFX)]. Direct annual HRU costs related to UC ranged between 7426 (IFX) EUR and 22,265 (UST) in France, with mean 11,181 EUR in the dose-escalation group vs 8323 EUR in the de-escalation group (+11.5%). In the UK costs ranged between 5006 (ADA) EUR and 11,975 (UST).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dose escalation of UC advanced therapies is a common strategy to avoid treatment-switching. Despite dose escalations and their cost to the system, a proportion of patients fail to achieve clinical response. This study highlights the need for more efficacious, durable treatments for moderate-to-severe UC patients, as the initiation of the advanced therapies did not reduce overall systemic/rectal corticosteroid burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"129-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881627/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S481730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S481730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)中,为避免类内或类间药物转换和维持临床反应而增加剂量以优化先进疗法是很常见的,并对成本有影响。鉴于现有的真实数据有限,本研究旨在了解法国和英国的真实剂量递增UC高级治疗模式。方法:回顾性研究2017年1月至2022年2月期间首次处方(和/或法国配药)(即晚期UC治疗新用户,通过排除在过去12个月内使用任何这些药物的患者)开始高级UC治疗(阿达木单抗[ADA],戈利单抗[GOL],英夫利昔单抗[IFX],托法替尼[TOF], ustekinumab [UST]或vedolizumab [VED])的中至重度UC成人患者。使用Kaplan-Meier (KM)生存分析估计维持日期后剂量增加/减少的患者比例(±20% vs .产品特性总结)。临床反应、医疗资源利用(HRU)和与UC相关的直接费用也进行了分析。结果:维持治疗开始后6个月内,至少一次剂量递增率为74.1%。总体而言,83.9-89%的患者分别在12-24个月内剂量增加,61.6%的患者有临床反应[范围从56.3% (ADA)到77.0% (IFX)]。在法国,与UC相关的HRU直接年度成本介于7426欧元(IFX)和22265欧元(UST)之间,剂量递增组平均为11,181欧元,而剂量递减组平均为8323欧元(+11.5%)。在英国,费用在5006欧元(ADA)和11975欧元(UST)之间。结论:UC高级治疗的剂量递增是避免治疗转换的常用策略。尽管剂量不断增加,并增加了系统的成本,但仍有一部分患者未能达到临床反应。这项研究强调了对中重度UC患者需要更有效、更持久的治疗,因为先进治疗的开始并没有减少全身/直肠皮质类固醇的总体负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dose Escalation Patterns and Associated Costs of Advanced Therapies for Ulcerative Colitis in France and the United Kingdom: A Retrospective Database Analysis.

Background: Dose escalation to optimize advanced therapies is common in ulcerative colitis (UC) to avoid intra-class or inter-class drug switching and maintain clinical response and has impact on costs. Given the limited real-world data available, this study aims to understand real-world dose escalation UC advanced therapies patterns in France and United Kingdom [UK].

Methods: Retrospective study in adult patients with moderate-to-severe UC starting an advanced UC therapy (adalimumab [ADA], golimumab [GOL], infliximab [IFX], tofacitinib [TOF], ustekinumab [UST], or vedolizumab [VED]) with first prescription (and/or dispensation for France) between January 2017 and February 2022 (ie advanced UC therapy new users, by excluding patients who used any of these drugs in the previous 12 months to their index date). Proportions of patients with dose escalation/de-escalation (±20% versus Summary of Product Characteristics) after maintenance date were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses. Clinical response, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and direct costs related to UC were also analyzed.

Results: Within 6 months after start of maintenance, rate of at least one dose escalation was 74.1%. Overall, 83.9-89% of patients had dose escalation within the 12-24 months, respectively, and 61.6% had clinical response [ranging from 56.3% (ADA) to 77.0% (IFX)]. Direct annual HRU costs related to UC ranged between 7426 (IFX) EUR and 22,265 (UST) in France, with mean 11,181 EUR in the dose-escalation group vs 8323 EUR in the de-escalation group (+11.5%). In the UK costs ranged between 5006 (ADA) EUR and 11,975 (UST).

Conclusion: Dose escalation of UC advanced therapies is a common strategy to avoid treatment-switching. Despite dose escalations and their cost to the system, a proportion of patients fail to achieve clinical response. This study highlights the need for more efficacious, durable treatments for moderate-to-severe UC patients, as the initiation of the advanced therapies did not reduce overall systemic/rectal corticosteroid burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信