Chelsea Handfield, Deirdre Hooper, Saranya P Wyles
{"title":"重组人透明质酸酶对常规透明质酸填料的影响:体外分析。","authors":"Chelsea Handfield, Deirdre Hooper, Saranya P Wyles","doi":"10.36849/JDD.8428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers offer an advantage in being easily reversible with enzymatic hyaluronidase administration. Yet, there are no clear guidelines regarding the amount of hyaluronidase that should be administered given that commercially available fillers differ in constituent properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six HA fillers were mixed with aliquots of human recombinant hyaluronidase (0 mL, 0.1 mL, 0.2 mL, and 0.3 mL). Filler dilution photography was obtained with the addition of various doses of hyaluronidase. Final filler and hyaluronidase mixture was then visualized on light microscopy at 40X magnification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the fillers responded to the direct addition of hyaluronidase alone. Active mixing was required to stimulate the enzymatic effect. Restylane products which have equal concentrations at 20 mg/mL exhibited similar rates of dissolution. In contrast, Juvederm products, which differ in concentration, exhibited variable rates of dissolution. Juvederm Volbella (15 mg/mL) was the most easily dissolvable filler, in contrast, Juvederm Ultra (24 mg/mL) was the least easily dissolvable filler. Microscopically, Juvederm fillers appeared more refined whereas the Restylane fillers appeared more globular following hyaluronidase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the in vitro response of different HA fillers to hyaluronidase. Each filler exhibited a variable dose effect. HA concentration (mg/mL) was the critical variable in determining the rate of hydrolysis. Therefore, HA concentration may be an important factor when calculating the dose of hyaluronidase needed to reverse HA fillers. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(3):303-306. doi:10.36849/JDD.8428.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":"24 3","pages":"303-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase on Conventional Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: An In Vitro Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Handfield, Deirdre Hooper, Saranya P Wyles\",\"doi\":\"10.36849/JDD.8428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers offer an advantage in being easily reversible with enzymatic hyaluronidase administration. Yet, there are no clear guidelines regarding the amount of hyaluronidase that should be administered given that commercially available fillers differ in constituent properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six HA fillers were mixed with aliquots of human recombinant hyaluronidase (0 mL, 0.1 mL, 0.2 mL, and 0.3 mL). Filler dilution photography was obtained with the addition of various doses of hyaluronidase. Final filler and hyaluronidase mixture was then visualized on light microscopy at 40X magnification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the fillers responded to the direct addition of hyaluronidase alone. Active mixing was required to stimulate the enzymatic effect. Restylane products which have equal concentrations at 20 mg/mL exhibited similar rates of dissolution. In contrast, Juvederm products, which differ in concentration, exhibited variable rates of dissolution. Juvederm Volbella (15 mg/mL) was the most easily dissolvable filler, in contrast, Juvederm Ultra (24 mg/mL) was the least easily dissolvable filler. Microscopically, Juvederm fillers appeared more refined whereas the Restylane fillers appeared more globular following hyaluronidase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the in vitro response of different HA fillers to hyaluronidase. Each filler exhibited a variable dose effect. HA concentration (mg/mL) was the critical variable in determining the rate of hydrolysis. Therefore, HA concentration may be an important factor when calculating the dose of hyaluronidase needed to reverse HA fillers. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(3):303-306. doi:10.36849/JDD.8428.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"303-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase on Conventional Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: An In Vitro Analysis.
Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers offer an advantage in being easily reversible with enzymatic hyaluronidase administration. Yet, there are no clear guidelines regarding the amount of hyaluronidase that should be administered given that commercially available fillers differ in constituent properties.
Methods: Six HA fillers were mixed with aliquots of human recombinant hyaluronidase (0 mL, 0.1 mL, 0.2 mL, and 0.3 mL). Filler dilution photography was obtained with the addition of various doses of hyaluronidase. Final filler and hyaluronidase mixture was then visualized on light microscopy at 40X magnification.
Results: None of the fillers responded to the direct addition of hyaluronidase alone. Active mixing was required to stimulate the enzymatic effect. Restylane products which have equal concentrations at 20 mg/mL exhibited similar rates of dissolution. In contrast, Juvederm products, which differ in concentration, exhibited variable rates of dissolution. Juvederm Volbella (15 mg/mL) was the most easily dissolvable filler, in contrast, Juvederm Ultra (24 mg/mL) was the least easily dissolvable filler. Microscopically, Juvederm fillers appeared more refined whereas the Restylane fillers appeared more globular following hyaluronidase.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the in vitro response of different HA fillers to hyaluronidase. Each filler exhibited a variable dose effect. HA concentration (mg/mL) was the critical variable in determining the rate of hydrolysis. Therefore, HA concentration may be an important factor when calculating the dose of hyaluronidase needed to reverse HA fillers. J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(3):303-306. doi:10.36849/JDD.8428.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology.
We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality.
Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.