Bryan J Neth, Robert M Kraft, Kathryn L Eschbacher, Derek R Johnson, Paul A Decker, Ugur T Sener, Joon H Uhm, Michael W Ruff, Jonathan D Schwartz, William G Breen, Muhammad Asad Maqbool, David J Daniels, Terry C Burns, Ian F Parney, Aditya Raghunathan, Sani H Kizilbash
{"title":"表征成人中线胶质瘤的分子和空间异质性:单一机构分析。","authors":"Bryan J Neth, Robert M Kraft, Kathryn L Eschbacher, Derek R Johnson, Paul A Decker, Ugur T Sener, Joon H Uhm, Michael W Ruff, Jonathan D Schwartz, William G Breen, Muhammad Asad Maqbool, David J Daniels, Terry C Burns, Ian F Parney, Aditya Raghunathan, Sani H Kizilbash","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-04994-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Primary gliomas arising within midline structures of the central nervous system are associated with a worse prognosis compared with hemispheric gliomas. In adults, compared to their pediatric counterparts, adult midline gliomas are not as clearly characterized on the clinical behavior, prognostic factors, and treatment approaches for these diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort assessed all adult (≥ 18 years) patients from our institution with diffuse gliomas arising from midline structures at time of diagnosis (2014-2020). Molecular features characterized using immunohistochemistry, targeted next-generation sequencing, and chromosomal microarray analysis were collected. Patient characteristics were compared across groups using analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and the chi-square test as appropriate. Cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons across groups were made using the log rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>79 patients were included in analysis, with a median follow-up of 22.5 months (range, 0.6-123). The mean age at diagnosis was 44.5 years (range, 19.4-76.4), and 51% (n = 40) were female. Thalamus/basal ganglia was the most common primary tumor location (47%), followed by the brainstem (30%), and cerebellum (23%). For the entire cohort, median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 9.4-20.1), and median OS was 25.5 months (95% CI 22.0-38.2). We grouped primary tumor types into four distinct diagnostic entities based on integrated histological and molecular features, which had survival differences (log-rank p = 0.007)-diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered (17% with median OS 19.4 months); astrocytoma, IDH-wild type, not otherwise specified (42% with median OS 25.5 months); glioblastoma, IDH-wild type (24% with median OS 11.0 months); and astrocytoma, IDH-mutant (18% with OS 63.3 months). There were no cases of IDH-mutant tumors in the thalamus/basal ganglia. IDH-mutant tumors had better prognosis (OS: IDH-mutant 63.3 months, IDH-wild type 22.5 months, log-rank p = 0.003). Tumor enhancement and diffusion restriction at initial diagnosis was associated with worse prognosis (OS: enhancing 22.0 months, non-enhancing 64.5 months, log-rank p < 0.001; OS: restriction 20.3 months, no restriction 30.6 months, log-rank p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is significant molecular heterogeneity between midline gliomas which has prognostic implications. These findings emphasize the need to molecularly characterize these tumors to facilitate personalized treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"369-381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing the molecular and spatial heterogeneity of midline gliomas in adults: a single institution analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bryan J Neth, Robert M Kraft, Kathryn L Eschbacher, Derek R Johnson, Paul A Decker, Ugur T Sener, Joon H Uhm, Michael W Ruff, Jonathan D Schwartz, William G Breen, Muhammad Asad Maqbool, David J Daniels, Terry C Burns, Ian F Parney, Aditya Raghunathan, Sani H Kizilbash\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-025-04994-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Primary gliomas arising within midline structures of the central nervous system are associated with a worse prognosis compared with hemispheric gliomas. In adults, compared to their pediatric counterparts, adult midline gliomas are not as clearly characterized on the clinical behavior, prognostic factors, and treatment approaches for these diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort assessed all adult (≥ 18 years) patients from our institution with diffuse gliomas arising from midline structures at time of diagnosis (2014-2020). Molecular features characterized using immunohistochemistry, targeted next-generation sequencing, and chromosomal microarray analysis were collected. Patient characteristics were compared across groups using analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and the chi-square test as appropriate. Cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons across groups were made using the log rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>79 patients were included in analysis, with a median follow-up of 22.5 months (range, 0.6-123). The mean age at diagnosis was 44.5 years (range, 19.4-76.4), and 51% (n = 40) were female. Thalamus/basal ganglia was the most common primary tumor location (47%), followed by the brainstem (30%), and cerebellum (23%). For the entire cohort, median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 9.4-20.1), and median OS was 25.5 months (95% CI 22.0-38.2). We grouped primary tumor types into four distinct diagnostic entities based on integrated histological and molecular features, which had survival differences (log-rank p = 0.007)-diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered (17% with median OS 19.4 months); astrocytoma, IDH-wild type, not otherwise specified (42% with median OS 25.5 months); glioblastoma, IDH-wild type (24% with median OS 11.0 months); and astrocytoma, IDH-mutant (18% with OS 63.3 months). There were no cases of IDH-mutant tumors in the thalamus/basal ganglia. IDH-mutant tumors had better prognosis (OS: IDH-mutant 63.3 months, IDH-wild type 22.5 months, log-rank p = 0.003). Tumor enhancement and diffusion restriction at initial diagnosis was associated with worse prognosis (OS: enhancing 22.0 months, non-enhancing 64.5 months, log-rank p < 0.001; OS: restriction 20.3 months, no restriction 30.6 months, log-rank p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is significant molecular heterogeneity between midline gliomas which has prognostic implications. These findings emphasize the need to molecularly characterize these tumors to facilitate personalized treatment approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"369-381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-04994-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-04994-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:发生在中枢神经系统中线结构内的原发性胶质瘤与半球胶质瘤相比预后更差。在成人中,与儿童相比,成人中线胶质瘤在临床行为、预后因素和治疗方法上没有明确的特征。方法:本回顾性队列研究评估了2014-2020年本院所有诊断时起源于中线结构的弥漫性胶质瘤的成人(≥18岁)患者。利用免疫组织化学、靶向下一代测序和染色体微阵列分析收集分子特征。采用方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis和卡方检验比较各组患者特征。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计累积无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)概率。组间比较采用对数秩检验。结果:79例患者纳入分析,中位随访22.5个月(范围0.6-123)。平均诊断年龄为44.5岁(19.4-76.4),女性占51% (n = 40)。丘脑/基底神经节是最常见的原发肿瘤部位(47%),其次是脑干(30%)和小脑(23%)。对于整个队列,中位PFS为11.5个月(95% CI 9.4-20.1),中位OS为25.5个月(95% CI 22.0-38.2)。我们将原发性肿瘤类型分为四种不同的诊断实体,基于综合的组织学和分子特征,它们具有生存差异(log-rank p = 0.007)-弥漫性中线胶质瘤,H3 k27改变(17%,中位生存期19.4个月);星形细胞瘤,idh野生型,无其他指定(42%,中位生存期25.5个月);胶质母细胞瘤,idh野生型(24%,中位生存期11.0个月);星形细胞瘤,idh突变(18%,生存期63.3个月)。丘脑/基底节区未见idh突变肿瘤。idh突变型肿瘤预后较好(OS: idh突变型63.3个月,idh野生型22.5个月,log-rank p = 0.003)。初始诊断时肿瘤增强和扩散受限与预后差相关(生存期:增强22.0个月,非增强64.5个月,log-rank p)。结论:中线胶质瘤之间存在显著的分子异质性,对预后有影响。这些发现强调了对这些肿瘤进行分子表征以促进个性化治疗方法的必要性。
Characterizing the molecular and spatial heterogeneity of midline gliomas in adults: a single institution analysis.
Purpose: Primary gliomas arising within midline structures of the central nervous system are associated with a worse prognosis compared with hemispheric gliomas. In adults, compared to their pediatric counterparts, adult midline gliomas are not as clearly characterized on the clinical behavior, prognostic factors, and treatment approaches for these diseases.
Methods: This retrospective cohort assessed all adult (≥ 18 years) patients from our institution with diffuse gliomas arising from midline structures at time of diagnosis (2014-2020). Molecular features characterized using immunohistochemistry, targeted next-generation sequencing, and chromosomal microarray analysis were collected. Patient characteristics were compared across groups using analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and the chi-square test as appropriate. Cumulative progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons across groups were made using the log rank test.
Results: 79 patients were included in analysis, with a median follow-up of 22.5 months (range, 0.6-123). The mean age at diagnosis was 44.5 years (range, 19.4-76.4), and 51% (n = 40) were female. Thalamus/basal ganglia was the most common primary tumor location (47%), followed by the brainstem (30%), and cerebellum (23%). For the entire cohort, median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI 9.4-20.1), and median OS was 25.5 months (95% CI 22.0-38.2). We grouped primary tumor types into four distinct diagnostic entities based on integrated histological and molecular features, which had survival differences (log-rank p = 0.007)-diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered (17% with median OS 19.4 months); astrocytoma, IDH-wild type, not otherwise specified (42% with median OS 25.5 months); glioblastoma, IDH-wild type (24% with median OS 11.0 months); and astrocytoma, IDH-mutant (18% with OS 63.3 months). There were no cases of IDH-mutant tumors in the thalamus/basal ganglia. IDH-mutant tumors had better prognosis (OS: IDH-mutant 63.3 months, IDH-wild type 22.5 months, log-rank p = 0.003). Tumor enhancement and diffusion restriction at initial diagnosis was associated with worse prognosis (OS: enhancing 22.0 months, non-enhancing 64.5 months, log-rank p < 0.001; OS: restriction 20.3 months, no restriction 30.6 months, log-rank p = 0.028).
Conclusion: There is significant molecular heterogeneity between midline gliomas which has prognostic implications. These findings emphasize the need to molecularly characterize these tumors to facilitate personalized treatment approaches.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.