社交媒体对脱发信息传播的影响:一项系统综述。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Raymond Ezzat, Narges Maskan Bermudez, Antonella Tosti
{"title":"社交媒体对脱发信息传播的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Raymond Ezzat, Narges Maskan Bermudez, Antonella Tosti","doi":"10.36849/JDD.7990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic study examines the quality of hair loss information disseminated on social media platforms, as well as its potential effects on users' decision-making, emotional states, and societal attitudes toward hair loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough search of MEDLINE and PubMed databases was conducted until May 13th, 2023 to identify research into the role of social media in disseminating hair loss knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review encompasses 11 studies investigating platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. We discovered significant variations in the quality of hair loss-related information on social media. The DISCERN scores ranged from 1.47 to 2.66, while the percentage of videos/posts created by dermatologists ranged from 0 to 18.9%. While certain reliable content from medical professionals was present, there was an overabundance of personal anecdotes, unproven remedies, and recommendations based on personal experiences. The potential impacts of such information are wide-ranging, potentially influencing user decision-making and societal perceptions. Misinformation and subpar content could also heighten distress and anxiety among individuals seeking hair loss solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the need for enhanced content quality on social media platforms. It advocates for greater involvement of medical professionals, stricter adherence to evidence-based information, and the cultivation of critical thinking skills among users.J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(3):307-311.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; doi:10.36849/JDD.7990.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":"24 3","pages":"307-311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media's Impact on Hair Loss Information Dissemination: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Raymond Ezzat, Narges Maskan Bermudez, Antonella Tosti\",\"doi\":\"10.36849/JDD.7990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic study examines the quality of hair loss information disseminated on social media platforms, as well as its potential effects on users' decision-making, emotional states, and societal attitudes toward hair loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough search of MEDLINE and PubMed databases was conducted until May 13th, 2023 to identify research into the role of social media in disseminating hair loss knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review encompasses 11 studies investigating platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. We discovered significant variations in the quality of hair loss-related information on social media. The DISCERN scores ranged from 1.47 to 2.66, while the percentage of videos/posts created by dermatologists ranged from 0 to 18.9%. While certain reliable content from medical professionals was present, there was an overabundance of personal anecdotes, unproven remedies, and recommendations based on personal experiences. The potential impacts of such information are wide-ranging, potentially influencing user decision-making and societal perceptions. Misinformation and subpar content could also heighten distress and anxiety among individuals seeking hair loss solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the need for enhanced content quality on social media platforms. It advocates for greater involvement of medical professionals, stricter adherence to evidence-based information, and the cultivation of critical thinking skills among users.J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(3):307-311.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; doi:10.36849/JDD.7990.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"307-311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.7990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.7990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统研究考察了社交媒体平台上传播的脱发信息的质量,以及这些信息对用户决策、情绪状态和社会对脱发态度的潜在影响。方法:对MEDLINE和PubMed数据库进行全面检索,直到2023年5月13日,以确定社交媒体在传播脱发知识中的作用的研究。结果:该系统综述包括11项研究,调查了Facebook、Twitter、Instagram、TikTok和YouTube等平台。我们发现社交媒体上与脱发相关的信息质量存在显著差异。DISCERN得分从1.47到2.66不等,而皮肤科医生制作的视频/帖子的百分比从0到18.9%不等。虽然有一些来自医学专业人士的可靠内容,但也有过多的个人轶事、未经证实的治疗方法和基于个人经历的建议。这些信息的潜在影响是广泛的,可能影响用户的决策和社会观念。错误的信息和不合格的内容也会增加寻求脱发解决方案的人的痛苦和焦虑。结论:本综述强调了提高社交媒体平台内容质量的必要性。它提倡医疗专业人员更多地参与,更严格地遵守循证信息,并培养用户的批判性思维技能。医学与皮肤杂志,2025;24(3):307-311。,,doi: 10.36849 / JDD.7990。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Media's Impact on Hair Loss Information Dissemination: A Systematic Review.

Objective: This systematic study examines the quality of hair loss information disseminated on social media platforms, as well as its potential effects on users' decision-making, emotional states, and societal attitudes toward hair loss.

Methods: A thorough search of MEDLINE and PubMed databases was conducted until May 13th, 2023 to identify research into the role of social media in disseminating hair loss knowledge.

Results: The systematic review encompasses 11 studies investigating platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. We discovered significant variations in the quality of hair loss-related information on social media. The DISCERN scores ranged from 1.47 to 2.66, while the percentage of videos/posts created by dermatologists ranged from 0 to 18.9%. While certain reliable content from medical professionals was present, there was an overabundance of personal anecdotes, unproven remedies, and recommendations based on personal experiences. The potential impacts of such information are wide-ranging, potentially influencing user decision-making and societal perceptions. Misinformation and subpar content could also heighten distress and anxiety among individuals seeking hair loss solutions.

Conclusion: This review highlights the need for enhanced content quality on social media platforms. It advocates for greater involvement of medical professionals, stricter adherence to evidence-based information, and the cultivation of critical thinking skills among users.J Drugs Dermatol. 2025;24(3):307-311.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7990.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology. We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality. Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信