经动脉化疗栓塞联合肝动脉输注化疗+ Lenvatinib治疗7级以上中期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配分析

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S506457
Sheng Zhong, Fengtao Zhang, Haiming Zhang, Honglei Hu, Quan Zeng, Yangyang Li, Qiming Wei
{"title":"经动脉化疗栓塞联合肝动脉输注化疗+ Lenvatinib治疗7级以上中期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Sheng Zhong, Fengtao Zhang, Haiming Zhang, Honglei Hu, Quan Zeng, Yangyang Li, Qiming Wei","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S506457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous LAUNCH trial revealed the promising effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, most intermediate-stage HCC exceeds the up-to-seven criteria, limiting their potential TACE benefits. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) was widely endorsed for delivering substantial survival benefits for high tumor burden HCC, outperforming TACE. Accordingly, we undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib for intermediate-stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2017 to November 2021, clinical data of intermediate-stage HCC patients beyond up-to-seven criteria received TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib or TACE alone from four medical centers in China were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability weighting (IPTW) were applied to balance baseline differences. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for survival analysis. Cox regression-based multivariate analysis was used to identify survival-related risk factors. We compare tumor response and the incidence of adverse reactions between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 294 intermediate-stage HCC patients beyond up-to-seven criteria received TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib (the TACEHL group, n = 127) or TACE monotherapy (the TACE group, n = 167) were finally enrolled. Following propensity matching, the median OS and median PFS in the TACEHL group were 34.6 months and 15.7 months, respectively, significantly higher than the 15.7 months and 6.9 months observed in the TACE group. In tumor response, the ORR was 71.4% in the TACEHL group and 30.8% in the TACE group (P < 0.001), the DCR was 92.3% in the TACEHL group and 75.8% in the TACE group (P = 0.005). The 3-4 grade adverse reactions were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For intermediate-stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria, the integration of TACE and HAIC plus lenvatinib therapy demonstrated substantial enhancements in survival prognosis, which is a promising treatment regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"445-458"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Plus Lenvatinib for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Up-To-Seven: A Multicentre, Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sheng Zhong, Fengtao Zhang, Haiming Zhang, Honglei Hu, Quan Zeng, Yangyang Li, Qiming Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JHC.S506457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous LAUNCH trial revealed the promising effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, most intermediate-stage HCC exceeds the up-to-seven criteria, limiting their potential TACE benefits. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) was widely endorsed for delivering substantial survival benefits for high tumor burden HCC, outperforming TACE. Accordingly, we undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib for intermediate-stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From June 2017 to November 2021, clinical data of intermediate-stage HCC patients beyond up-to-seven criteria received TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib or TACE alone from four medical centers in China were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability weighting (IPTW) were applied to balance baseline differences. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for survival analysis. Cox regression-based multivariate analysis was used to identify survival-related risk factors. We compare tumor response and the incidence of adverse reactions between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 294 intermediate-stage HCC patients beyond up-to-seven criteria received TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib (the TACEHL group, n = 127) or TACE monotherapy (the TACE group, n = 167) were finally enrolled. Following propensity matching, the median OS and median PFS in the TACEHL group were 34.6 months and 15.7 months, respectively, significantly higher than the 15.7 months and 6.9 months observed in the TACE group. In tumor response, the ORR was 71.4% in the TACEHL group and 30.8% in the TACE group (P < 0.001), the DCR was 92.3% in the TACEHL group and 75.8% in the TACE group (P = 0.005). The 3-4 grade adverse reactions were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For intermediate-stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria, the integration of TACE and HAIC plus lenvatinib therapy demonstrated substantial enhancements in survival prognosis, which is a promising treatment regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"445-458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881770/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S506457\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S506457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的LAUNCH试验揭示了经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合lenvatinib治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的良好效果。然而,大多数中期HCC超过了7级标准,限制了其潜在的TACE益处。肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)被广泛认可为对高肿瘤负荷HCC提供实质性的生存益处,优于TACE。因此,我们开展了这项研究,以评估TACE联合HAIC + lenvatinib治疗超过7个标准的中期HCC的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性收集2017年6月至2021年11月,中国4个医疗中心超过7项标准的中期HCC患者接受TACE联合HAIC + lenvatinib或单独TACE治疗的临床资料。采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)和逆概率加权(IPTW)来平衡基线差异。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。采用基于Cox回归的多因素分析来确定与生存相关的危险因素。我们比较两组之间的肿瘤反应和不良反应的发生率。结果:最终共有294例超过7项标准的中期HCC患者接受了TACE联合HAIC + lenvatinib (TACEHL组,n = 127)或TACE单药治疗(TACE组,n = 167)。倾向匹配后,TACEHL组的中位OS和中位PFS分别为34.6个月和15.7个月,显著高于TACE组的15.7个月和6.9个月。在肿瘤反应方面,TACEHL组的ORR为71.4%,TACE组为30.8% (P < 0.001); TACEHL组的DCR为92.3%,TACE组为75.8% (P = 0.005)。3 ~ 4级不良反应组间具有可比性。结论:对于超过7级标准的中期HCC, TACE和HAIC联合lenvatinib治疗可显著改善生存预后,是一种很有前景的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Plus Lenvatinib for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Up-To-Seven: A Multicentre, Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Background: Previous LAUNCH trial revealed the promising effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, most intermediate-stage HCC exceeds the up-to-seven criteria, limiting their potential TACE benefits. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) was widely endorsed for delivering substantial survival benefits for high tumor burden HCC, outperforming TACE. Accordingly, we undertook this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib for intermediate-stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria.

Methods: From June 2017 to November 2021, clinical data of intermediate-stage HCC patients beyond up-to-seven criteria received TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib or TACE alone from four medical centers in China were retrospectively collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability weighting (IPTW) were applied to balance baseline differences. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for survival analysis. Cox regression-based multivariate analysis was used to identify survival-related risk factors. We compare tumor response and the incidence of adverse reactions between groups.

Results: A total of 294 intermediate-stage HCC patients beyond up-to-seven criteria received TACE combined with HAIC plus lenvatinib (the TACEHL group, n = 127) or TACE monotherapy (the TACE group, n = 167) were finally enrolled. Following propensity matching, the median OS and median PFS in the TACEHL group were 34.6 months and 15.7 months, respectively, significantly higher than the 15.7 months and 6.9 months observed in the TACE group. In tumor response, the ORR was 71.4% in the TACEHL group and 30.8% in the TACE group (P < 0.001), the DCR was 92.3% in the TACEHL group and 75.8% in the TACE group (P = 0.005). The 3-4 grade adverse reactions were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion: For intermediate-stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria, the integration of TACE and HAIC plus lenvatinib therapy demonstrated substantial enhancements in survival prognosis, which is a promising treatment regimen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信