{"title":"带有爆发动作的负重阻力训练对社区老年人力量发展速度的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Tomoharu Kitada, Hiroyuki Umegaki, Hiroshi Akima, Koji Ishida, Masahiro Nakatochi, Aiko Inoue, Chi Hsien Huang, Masahiko Ando, Joji Onishi, Masafumi Kuzuya","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2024-0431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eliminating risk factors for falls leads to reduction of the incidence of frailty. The recommended training program used only body weight resistance and no equipment to prepare for quick movements in daily living in community-dwelling older adults is unknown. Thus, we compared the effects of weight-bearing resistance training with (WEM) and without explosive motions (WOEM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty older adults were randomly assigned to WEM and WOEM groups. The WEM group performed the concentric phase during repetitions quickly and the WOEM group performed it at traditional velocity. The designated training programs consisted of 8 events to train the whole body for 50 minutes twice a week for 12 weeks. The changes in the rate of force development of toe grip, single knee extension, and flexion from baseline to 12 weeks were measured. Between-group differences were analyzed for changes in each outcome variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven participants in the WEM group (70 [5] y) and 21 participants in the WOEM group (69 [4] y) completed the study. The change in the early rate of force development of toe grip from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater in the WEM group (0-30 ms: effect size = 0.53, 95% CI = 6.36-68.10, P = .049; 0-50 ms: effect size = 0.56, CI = 10.05-86.02, P = .046) than in the WOEM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Weight-bearing resistance training with explosive motions has the advantage of not being limited to tools and places. Therefore, it is more suitable than traditional repetition velocity training for quick movement by increasing rate of force development in community-dwelling older adults before they become frail.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Weight-Bearing Resistance Training With Explosive Motions on the Rate of Force Development in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tomoharu Kitada, Hiroyuki Umegaki, Hiroshi Akima, Koji Ishida, Masahiro Nakatochi, Aiko Inoue, Chi Hsien Huang, Masahiko Ando, Joji Onishi, Masafumi Kuzuya\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jpah.2024-0431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eliminating risk factors for falls leads to reduction of the incidence of frailty. The recommended training program used only body weight resistance and no equipment to prepare for quick movements in daily living in community-dwelling older adults is unknown. Thus, we compared the effects of weight-bearing resistance training with (WEM) and without explosive motions (WOEM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty older adults were randomly assigned to WEM and WOEM groups. The WEM group performed the concentric phase during repetitions quickly and the WOEM group performed it at traditional velocity. The designated training programs consisted of 8 events to train the whole body for 50 minutes twice a week for 12 weeks. The changes in the rate of force development of toe grip, single knee extension, and flexion from baseline to 12 weeks were measured. Between-group differences were analyzed for changes in each outcome variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven participants in the WEM group (70 [5] y) and 21 participants in the WOEM group (69 [4] y) completed the study. The change in the early rate of force development of toe grip from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater in the WEM group (0-30 ms: effect size = 0.53, 95% CI = 6.36-68.10, P = .049; 0-50 ms: effect size = 0.56, CI = 10.05-86.02, P = .046) than in the WOEM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Weight-bearing resistance training with explosive motions has the advantage of not being limited to tools and places. Therefore, it is more suitable than traditional repetition velocity training for quick movement by increasing rate of force development in community-dwelling older adults before they become frail.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0431\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:消除跌倒的危险因素可以减少虚弱的发生率。推荐的训练计划仅使用体重阻力,而不使用设备为社区居住的老年人日常生活中的快速运动做准备,目前尚不清楚。因此,我们比较了负重阻力训练有(WEM)和没有爆炸动作(WOEM)的效果。方法:60名老年人随机分为WEM组和WOEM组。重复时,WEM组快速进行同心圆相位,WOEM组以传统速度进行同心圆相位。指定的训练项目包括8个项目,每周两次,每次50分钟,持续12周。从基线到12周,测量了脚趾握力、单膝伸展和屈曲的力量发展率的变化。分析各组间各结果变量的变化。结果:WEM组27名参与者(70 [5]y)和WOEM组21名参与者(69 [5]y)完成研究。从基线到12周,WEM组脚趾握力早期发展率的变化明显更大(0-30 ms:效应值= 0.53,95% CI = 6.36-68.10, P = 0.049;0 ~ 50 ms:效应值= 0.56,CI = 10.05 ~ 86.02, P = 0.046)。结论:爆发力负重阻力训练具有不局限于工具和场所的优点。因此,它比传统的重复速度训练更适合社区居住的老年人在身体虚弱之前通过提高力量发展速度来进行快速运动。
Effects of Weight-Bearing Resistance Training With Explosive Motions on the Rate of Force Development in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background: Eliminating risk factors for falls leads to reduction of the incidence of frailty. The recommended training program used only body weight resistance and no equipment to prepare for quick movements in daily living in community-dwelling older adults is unknown. Thus, we compared the effects of weight-bearing resistance training with (WEM) and without explosive motions (WOEM).
Methods: Sixty older adults were randomly assigned to WEM and WOEM groups. The WEM group performed the concentric phase during repetitions quickly and the WOEM group performed it at traditional velocity. The designated training programs consisted of 8 events to train the whole body for 50 minutes twice a week for 12 weeks. The changes in the rate of force development of toe grip, single knee extension, and flexion from baseline to 12 weeks were measured. Between-group differences were analyzed for changes in each outcome variable.
Results: Twenty-seven participants in the WEM group (70 [5] y) and 21 participants in the WOEM group (69 [4] y) completed the study. The change in the early rate of force development of toe grip from baseline to 12 weeks was significantly greater in the WEM group (0-30 ms: effect size = 0.53, 95% CI = 6.36-68.10, P = .049; 0-50 ms: effect size = 0.56, CI = 10.05-86.02, P = .046) than in the WOEM group.
Conclusions: Weight-bearing resistance training with explosive motions has the advantage of not being limited to tools and places. Therefore, it is more suitable than traditional repetition velocity training for quick movement by increasing rate of force development in community-dwelling older adults before they become frail.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.