瑞芬太尼在减肥和代谢手术患者中的安全性和有效性——一项系统综述。

IF 1.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_825_24
Abhijit S Nair, Indira Gurajala, Nitinkumar Borkar, Ujjwalraj Dudhedia, Manamohan Rangaiah, Sandeep Diwan
{"title":"瑞芬太尼在减肥和代谢手术患者中的安全性和有效性——一项系统综述。","authors":"Abhijit S Nair, Indira Gurajala, Nitinkumar Borkar, Ujjwalraj Dudhedia, Manamohan Rangaiah, Sandeep Diwan","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_825_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Obese patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries have a high chance of respiratory depression and could need admission to an intensive care unit or a high-dependency unit. Several studies have compared remifentanil to other opioids or non-opioids in these patients. This review investigated the efficacy and safety of remifentanil in bariatric and metabolic surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After registering with PROSPERO, we searched PubMed/Medline, Ovid, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library with relevant keywords to find studies in which remifentanil was compared to other opioids or non-opioids in adult patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries. We used the risk of bias-2 tool to assess bias and Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to determine the level of evidence. RevMan 5.4 was used to perform a quantitative meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 121 articles retrieved from the database search, seven articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall bias was low in five studies and high in two studies. There was significant heterogeneity in the control group, which comprised opioids and also non-opioids like labetalol, dexmedetomidine and lignocaine. A quantitative meta-analysis was not reported due to a lack of comparable data for a meaningful quantitative meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this systematic review neither support nor refute the use of remifentanil in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries, compared to other medications. Further studies are needed to investigate its efficacy and safety in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 1","pages":"123-131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of remifentanil in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries - A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Abhijit S Nair, Indira Gurajala, Nitinkumar Borkar, Ujjwalraj Dudhedia, Manamohan Rangaiah, Sandeep Diwan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_825_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Obese patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries have a high chance of respiratory depression and could need admission to an intensive care unit or a high-dependency unit. Several studies have compared remifentanil to other opioids or non-opioids in these patients. This review investigated the efficacy and safety of remifentanil in bariatric and metabolic surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After registering with PROSPERO, we searched PubMed/Medline, Ovid, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library with relevant keywords to find studies in which remifentanil was compared to other opioids or non-opioids in adult patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries. We used the risk of bias-2 tool to assess bias and Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to determine the level of evidence. RevMan 5.4 was used to perform a quantitative meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 121 articles retrieved from the database search, seven articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall bias was low in five studies and high in two studies. There was significant heterogeneity in the control group, which comprised opioids and also non-opioids like labetalol, dexmedetomidine and lignocaine. A quantitative meta-analysis was not reported due to a lack of comparable data for a meaningful quantitative meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this systematic review neither support nor refute the use of remifentanil in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries, compared to other medications. Further studies are needed to investigate its efficacy and safety in these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"123-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878369/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_825_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_825_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:接受减肥和代谢手术的肥胖患者有很高的机会出现呼吸抑制,可能需要进入重症监护病房或高依赖性病房。几项研究将这些患者的瑞芬太尼与其他阿片类药物或非阿片类药物进行了比较。本综述调查了瑞芬太尼在减肥和代谢手术中的有效性和安全性。方法:在PROSPERO注册后,我们检索PubMed/Medline、Ovid、CINAHL和Cochrane Library相关关键词,找到瑞芬太尼与其他阿片类药物或非阿片类药物在接受减肥和代谢手术的成人患者中的比较研究。我们使用偏倚风险-2工具来评估偏倚,并使用推荐、评估、发展和评估的分级来确定证据的水平。采用RevMan 5.4进行定量meta分析。结果:在数据库检索到的121篇文献中,有7篇符合纳入标准。5项研究的总体偏倚较低,2项研究偏倚较高。对照组包括阿片类药物和非阿片类药物,如拉贝他洛尔、右美托咪定和利多卡因,存在显著的异质性。由于缺乏有意义的定量荟萃分析的可比数据,因此未报道定量荟萃分析。结论:与其他药物相比,本系统综述的结果既不支持也不反对在接受减肥和代谢手术的患者中使用瑞芬太尼。需要进一步研究其在这些患者中的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of remifentanil in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries - A systematic review.

Background and aims: Obese patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries have a high chance of respiratory depression and could need admission to an intensive care unit or a high-dependency unit. Several studies have compared remifentanil to other opioids or non-opioids in these patients. This review investigated the efficacy and safety of remifentanil in bariatric and metabolic surgeries.

Methods: After registering with PROSPERO, we searched PubMed/Medline, Ovid, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library with relevant keywords to find studies in which remifentanil was compared to other opioids or non-opioids in adult patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries. We used the risk of bias-2 tool to assess bias and Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to determine the level of evidence. RevMan 5.4 was used to perform a quantitative meta-analysis.

Results: Of the 121 articles retrieved from the database search, seven articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall bias was low in five studies and high in two studies. There was significant heterogeneity in the control group, which comprised opioids and also non-opioids like labetalol, dexmedetomidine and lignocaine. A quantitative meta-analysis was not reported due to a lack of comparable data for a meaningful quantitative meta-analysis.

Conclusion: The results of this systematic review neither support nor refute the use of remifentanil in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgeries, compared to other medications. Further studies are needed to investigate its efficacy and safety in these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信