在以人群为基础的筛查项目中,乳房密度通知后对乳腺癌风险的认知。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s10549-025-07662-1
Dorinda 't Hart, Ross Marriott, Jennifer Stone
{"title":"在以人群为基础的筛查项目中,乳房密度通知后对乳腺癌风险的认知。","authors":"Dorinda 't Hart, Ross Marriott, Jennifer Stone","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07662-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite increasing evidence to support risk-based breast cancer screening, individuals' understanding of personal risk is not well understood. This study compares women's perceptions of risk to their estimated risk, and examines factors associated with perceived risk, including breast density notification, within a population-based screening program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 5784 women measured their perceived risk via three questions: a number from 0 to 100 (numeric), a category from very low to very high (verbal), a comparative category relative to an average woman (comparative). Descriptive analyses assessed correlations between perceived risk variables and estimated risk (using the Gail Model), and modelled relationships using K-fold cross-validation. A Graded Response Model was used to obtain an index of unobserved (latent) overall perceived risk from the three questions. Multivariable modelling was used to investigate factors associated with overall perceived risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants perceived themselves as being at neither high nor low risk, although perceived risk was higher than estimated risk, on average. All three perceived risk measures were positively correlated with each other and with estimated risk. Overall perceived risk was weakly associated with estimated risk (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.12). Women who received multiple breast density notifications, were younger, or had a family history, perceived their risk as higher relative to respective reference groups. Those who identified as Asian perceived their risk as lower than those who identified as European/Caucasian.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals' understanding of breast cancer risk is poor. New strategies are needed to improve education and awareness of personal risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"455-465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of breast cancer risk after breast density notification in a population-based screening program.\",\"authors\":\"Dorinda 't Hart, Ross Marriott, Jennifer Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-025-07662-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite increasing evidence to support risk-based breast cancer screening, individuals' understanding of personal risk is not well understood. This study compares women's perceptions of risk to their estimated risk, and examines factors associated with perceived risk, including breast density notification, within a population-based screening program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of 5784 women measured their perceived risk via three questions: a number from 0 to 100 (numeric), a category from very low to very high (verbal), a comparative category relative to an average woman (comparative). Descriptive analyses assessed correlations between perceived risk variables and estimated risk (using the Gail Model), and modelled relationships using K-fold cross-validation. A Graded Response Model was used to obtain an index of unobserved (latent) overall perceived risk from the three questions. Multivariable modelling was used to investigate factors associated with overall perceived risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants perceived themselves as being at neither high nor low risk, although perceived risk was higher than estimated risk, on average. All three perceived risk measures were positively correlated with each other and with estimated risk. Overall perceived risk was weakly associated with estimated risk (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.12). Women who received multiple breast density notifications, were younger, or had a family history, perceived their risk as higher relative to respective reference groups. Those who identified as Asian perceived their risk as lower than those who identified as European/Caucasian.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals' understanding of breast cancer risk is poor. New strategies are needed to improve education and awareness of personal risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"455-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006211/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07662-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07662-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管越来越多的证据支持基于风险的乳腺癌筛查,但个体对个人风险的理解尚不清楚。本研究比较了妇女对风险的感知和她们的估计风险,并在基于人群的筛查项目中检查了与感知风险相关的因素,包括乳房密度通知。方法:一项对5784名女性的调查通过三个问题来衡量她们的感知风险:从0到100的数字(数字),从非常低到非常高的类别(口头),相对于普通女性的比较类别(比较)。描述性分析评估感知风险变量和估计风险之间的相关性(使用Gail模型),并使用K-fold交叉验证建模关系。使用分级反应模型从三个问题中获得未观察到的(潜在的)总体感知风险指数。多变量模型用于调查与总体感知风险相关的因素。结果:大多数参与者认为自己的风险既不高也不低,尽管平均而言,感知风险高于估计风险。所有三种感知风险措施相互之间以及与估计风险呈正相关。总体感知风险与估计风险呈弱相关(校正R2 = 0.12)。收到多次乳腺密度通知的女性,年龄较小,或有家族病史,认为自己的风险相对于各自的参照组更高。那些被认为是亚洲人的人认为自己的风险低于那些被认为是欧洲人/白种人的人。结论:个体对乳腺癌风险的认识较差。需要新的策略来提高教育和个人风险意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of breast cancer risk after breast density notification in a population-based screening program.

Background: Despite increasing evidence to support risk-based breast cancer screening, individuals' understanding of personal risk is not well understood. This study compares women's perceptions of risk to their estimated risk, and examines factors associated with perceived risk, including breast density notification, within a population-based screening program.

Methods: A survey of 5784 women measured their perceived risk via three questions: a number from 0 to 100 (numeric), a category from very low to very high (verbal), a comparative category relative to an average woman (comparative). Descriptive analyses assessed correlations between perceived risk variables and estimated risk (using the Gail Model), and modelled relationships using K-fold cross-validation. A Graded Response Model was used to obtain an index of unobserved (latent) overall perceived risk from the three questions. Multivariable modelling was used to investigate factors associated with overall perceived risk.

Results: Most participants perceived themselves as being at neither high nor low risk, although perceived risk was higher than estimated risk, on average. All three perceived risk measures were positively correlated with each other and with estimated risk. Overall perceived risk was weakly associated with estimated risk (adjusted R2 = 0.12). Women who received multiple breast density notifications, were younger, or had a family history, perceived their risk as higher relative to respective reference groups. Those who identified as Asian perceived their risk as lower than those who identified as European/Caucasian.

Conclusion: Individuals' understanding of breast cancer risk is poor. New strategies are needed to improve education and awareness of personal risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信