流动外科中心和医院门诊部骨科运动医学程序的成本比较。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-05 Print Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.010424
Scott Harrison, Jimmy Ro, Abdel-Rahman Lawendy, Alan Getgood, Robert Giffin, Robert Litchfield, Kevin Willits, Ryan M Degen
{"title":"流动外科中心和医院门诊部骨科运动医学程序的成本比较。","authors":"Scott Harrison, Jimmy Ro, Abdel-Rahman Lawendy, Alan Getgood, Robert Giffin, Robert Litchfield, Kevin Willits, Ryan M Degen","doi":"10.1503/cjs.010424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambulatory surgery centres are becoming an attractive alternative to hospital-based outpatient departments; however, limited data exist on their cost efficacy in a publicly funded health care model. In this study, we aimed to compare costs for ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre and a hospital outpatient department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients who underwent rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), or hip arthroscopy between January 2020 and August 2022. We collected demographic characteristics, procedural costs, and procedural data. We used 2-sample <i>t</i> tests to compare care-related costs between groups treated in an ambulatory surgery centre and hospital outpatient department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for age and concomitant procedures, we included a total of 132 patients for analysis. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy or rotator cuff repair in an ambulatory surgery centre had significantly shorter duration of total operating room time, and procedural duration was equivocal (<i>p</i> > 0.1) between sites. Procedure time for ACLR was significantly shorter in the group treated in an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group treated in a hospital outpatient department (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The total case costs for the ambulatory surgery centre were significantly lower for hip arthroscopy ($3543, standard deviation (SD) $365 v. $6209, SD $681; <i>p</i> < 0.05), rotator cuff repair ($4259, SD $934 v. $5786, SD $934; <i>p</i> < 0.05), and ACLR ($3136, SD $459 v. $4821, SD $1511; <i>p</i> < 0.05), despite a lack of differences in associated disposable implant costs for ACLR and rotator cuff repair (<i>p</i> > 0.1). Material costs were significantly lower in the group receiving hip arthroscopy at an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group receiving the same procedure at a hospital outpatient department (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were no differences in immediate 6-week postoperative care-associated costs between groups (<i>p</i> > 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre were associated with significantly reduced operating room time and total cost compared with matched cases performed via a hospital outpatient department. Ambulatory surgery centres provide an opportunity to improve cost efficacy and reduce wait-lists for surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 2","pages":"E89-E96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost comparison of orthopedic sports medicine procedures in an ambulatory surgical centre and a hospital outpatient department.\",\"authors\":\"Scott Harrison, Jimmy Ro, Abdel-Rahman Lawendy, Alan Getgood, Robert Giffin, Robert Litchfield, Kevin Willits, Ryan M Degen\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/cjs.010424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambulatory surgery centres are becoming an attractive alternative to hospital-based outpatient departments; however, limited data exist on their cost efficacy in a publicly funded health care model. In this study, we aimed to compare costs for ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre and a hospital outpatient department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients who underwent rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), or hip arthroscopy between January 2020 and August 2022. We collected demographic characteristics, procedural costs, and procedural data. We used 2-sample <i>t</i> tests to compare care-related costs between groups treated in an ambulatory surgery centre and hospital outpatient department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for age and concomitant procedures, we included a total of 132 patients for analysis. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy or rotator cuff repair in an ambulatory surgery centre had significantly shorter duration of total operating room time, and procedural duration was equivocal (<i>p</i> > 0.1) between sites. Procedure time for ACLR was significantly shorter in the group treated in an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group treated in a hospital outpatient department (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The total case costs for the ambulatory surgery centre were significantly lower for hip arthroscopy ($3543, standard deviation (SD) $365 v. $6209, SD $681; <i>p</i> < 0.05), rotator cuff repair ($4259, SD $934 v. $5786, SD $934; <i>p</i> < 0.05), and ACLR ($3136, SD $459 v. $4821, SD $1511; <i>p</i> < 0.05), despite a lack of differences in associated disposable implant costs for ACLR and rotator cuff repair (<i>p</i> > 0.1). Material costs were significantly lower in the group receiving hip arthroscopy at an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group receiving the same procedure at a hospital outpatient department (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There were no differences in immediate 6-week postoperative care-associated costs between groups (<i>p</i> > 0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre were associated with significantly reduced operating room time and total cost compared with matched cases performed via a hospital outpatient department. Ambulatory surgery centres provide an opportunity to improve cost efficacy and reduce wait-lists for surgical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"68 2\",\"pages\":\"E89-E96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.010424\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.010424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:门诊手术中心正在成为医院门诊部的一个有吸引力的替代方案;然而,在公共资助的卫生保健模式下,关于其成本效益的数据有限。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较在流动外科中心和医院门诊部进行的流动运动医学程序的成本。方法:我们回顾性分析了在2020年1月至2022年8月期间接受肩袖修复、前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)或髋关节镜检查的患者。我们收集了人口统计学特征、程序成本和程序数据。我们使用双样本t检验来比较在门诊手术中心和医院门诊部治疗的两组之间的护理相关费用。结果:在控制年龄和伴随手术后,我们共纳入132例患者进行分析。在门诊手术中心接受髋关节镜或肩袖修复的患者总手术室时间明显更短,手术时间在不同地点之间存在差异(p > 0.1)。在门诊手术中心治疗的ACLR手术时间明显短于在医院门诊治疗的ACLR (p = 0.01)。门诊手术中心髋关节镜检查的总病例费用明显较低(3543美元,标准差365美元vs 6209美元,标准差681美元;p < 0.05),肩袖修复(4259美元,SD $934 vs . 5786美元,SD $934;p < 0.05), ACLR ($3136, SD $459 vs $4821, SD $1511;p < 0.05),尽管ACLR和肩袖修复的相关一次性种植体成本没有差异(p < 0.05)。在门诊手术中心接受髋关节镜检查组的材料成本明显低于在医院门诊接受相同手术的组(p < 0.05)。两组患者术后6周护理相关费用无差异(p < 0.05)。结论:与通过医院门诊部进行的匹配病例相比,在流动外科中心进行的流动运动医学手术显著减少了手术室时间和总成本。流动外科中心提供了一个机会,以提高成本效益和减少等待手术护理的名单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost comparison of orthopedic sports medicine procedures in an ambulatory surgical centre and a hospital outpatient department.

Background: Ambulatory surgery centres are becoming an attractive alternative to hospital-based outpatient departments; however, limited data exist on their cost efficacy in a publicly funded health care model. In this study, we aimed to compare costs for ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre and a hospital outpatient department.

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), or hip arthroscopy between January 2020 and August 2022. We collected demographic characteristics, procedural costs, and procedural data. We used 2-sample t tests to compare care-related costs between groups treated in an ambulatory surgery centre and hospital outpatient department.

Results: After controlling for age and concomitant procedures, we included a total of 132 patients for analysis. Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy or rotator cuff repair in an ambulatory surgery centre had significantly shorter duration of total operating room time, and procedural duration was equivocal (p > 0.1) between sites. Procedure time for ACLR was significantly shorter in the group treated in an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group treated in a hospital outpatient department (p = 0.01). The total case costs for the ambulatory surgery centre were significantly lower for hip arthroscopy ($3543, standard deviation (SD) $365 v. $6209, SD $681; p < 0.05), rotator cuff repair ($4259, SD $934 v. $5786, SD $934; p < 0.05), and ACLR ($3136, SD $459 v. $4821, SD $1511; p < 0.05), despite a lack of differences in associated disposable implant costs for ACLR and rotator cuff repair (p > 0.1). Material costs were significantly lower in the group receiving hip arthroscopy at an ambulatory surgery centre than in the group receiving the same procedure at a hospital outpatient department (p < 0.05). There were no differences in immediate 6-week postoperative care-associated costs between groups (p > 0.4).

Conclusion: Ambulatory sports medicine procedures performed at an ambulatory surgery centre were associated with significantly reduced operating room time and total cost compared with matched cases performed via a hospital outpatient department. Ambulatory surgery centres provide an opportunity to improve cost efficacy and reduce wait-lists for surgical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信