C J Henderson, A W McLaren, A K MacLeod, D Lin, A R Cameron, L R Chatham, J Moggs, F Inesta-Vaquera, John P Thomson, Richard R Meehan, P Chakravarty, M Schwarz, C Roland Wolf
{"title":"强效人CAR激活剂CITCO在人源型雄甾烷受体小鼠中是一种无遗传毒性的肝肿瘤促进剂,但在野生型动物中则不是。","authors":"C J Henderson, A W McLaren, A K MacLeod, D Lin, A R Cameron, L R Chatham, J Moggs, F Inesta-Vaquera, John P Thomson, Richard R Meehan, P Chakravarty, M Schwarz, C Roland Wolf","doi":"10.1007/s00204-025-03982-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A large number of drugs and compounds produced by the chemical and agrochemical industry, often referred to as 'non-genotoxic carcinogens' (NGC), score as tumour promotors in rodent models. It is unclear whether these compounds act similarly in humans. The most extensively investigated compounds have been the anti-convulsive drugs, phenobarbital (PB), and phenytoin. Liver tumours induced by PB are dependent upon the activation of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). However, marked species differences in CAR activation by exogenous chemicals exist with some being much more potent activators of human CAR, e.g., 6-(4-chlorophenyl)imidazo[2,1-β][1,3]thiazole-5-carbaldehyde-O-(3,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxime (CITCO). We have compared CITCO-induced tumour formation in the livers of mice in which murine CAR has been replaced with its human counterpart. Our findings reveal that CITCO-dependent liver tumours are only formed in mice-expressing human CAR and not in wild-type animals. In addition, contrary to one of the proposed mechanisms of NGC carcinogenicity, we show that CITCO did not induce a hyperplastic response in the liver of the humanised mice. These data raise some key questions about the mechanism of action of NGCs and identify the limitations of current rodent carcinogenicity test systems in relation to risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potent human CAR activator CITCO is a non-genotoxic hepatic tumour-promoting agent in humanised constitutive androstane receptor mice but not in wild-type animals.\",\"authors\":\"C J Henderson, A W McLaren, A K MacLeod, D Lin, A R Cameron, L R Chatham, J Moggs, F Inesta-Vaquera, John P Thomson, Richard R Meehan, P Chakravarty, M Schwarz, C Roland Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00204-025-03982-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A large number of drugs and compounds produced by the chemical and agrochemical industry, often referred to as 'non-genotoxic carcinogens' (NGC), score as tumour promotors in rodent models. It is unclear whether these compounds act similarly in humans. The most extensively investigated compounds have been the anti-convulsive drugs, phenobarbital (PB), and phenytoin. Liver tumours induced by PB are dependent upon the activation of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). However, marked species differences in CAR activation by exogenous chemicals exist with some being much more potent activators of human CAR, e.g., 6-(4-chlorophenyl)imidazo[2,1-β][1,3]thiazole-5-carbaldehyde-O-(3,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxime (CITCO). We have compared CITCO-induced tumour formation in the livers of mice in which murine CAR has been replaced with its human counterpart. Our findings reveal that CITCO-dependent liver tumours are only formed in mice-expressing human CAR and not in wild-type animals. In addition, contrary to one of the proposed mechanisms of NGC carcinogenicity, we show that CITCO did not induce a hyperplastic response in the liver of the humanised mice. These data raise some key questions about the mechanism of action of NGCs and identify the limitations of current rodent carcinogenicity test systems in relation to risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-025-03982-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-025-03982-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
化学和农化工业生产的大量药物和化合物,通常被称为“非遗传毒性致癌物”(NGC),在啮齿动物模型中被列为肿瘤促进剂。目前还不清楚这些化合物在人体中是否也有类似的作用。研究最广泛的化合物是抗惊厥药物,苯巴比妥(PB)和苯妥英。铅诱导的肝肿瘤依赖于组成型雄甾受体(CAR)的激活。然而,外源化学物质在CAR激活方面存在明显的物种差异,其中一些是更有效的人类CAR激活剂,例如6-(4-氯苯基)咪唑[2,1-β][1,3]噻唑-5-乙醛- o -(3,4-二氯苯基)肟(CITCO)。我们比较了citco在小鼠肝脏中诱导的肿瘤形成,其中小鼠CAR已被人类CAR所取代。我们的研究结果表明,citco依赖性肝肿瘤仅在表达人类CAR的小鼠中形成,而不在野生型动物中形成。此外,与提出的NGC致癌性机制之一相反,我们发现CITCO没有在人源化小鼠的肝脏中诱导增生性反应。这些数据对NGCs的作用机制提出了一些关键问题,并确定了当前啮齿动物致癌性测试系统在风险评估方面的局限性。
The potent human CAR activator CITCO is a non-genotoxic hepatic tumour-promoting agent in humanised constitutive androstane receptor mice but not in wild-type animals.
A large number of drugs and compounds produced by the chemical and agrochemical industry, often referred to as 'non-genotoxic carcinogens' (NGC), score as tumour promotors in rodent models. It is unclear whether these compounds act similarly in humans. The most extensively investigated compounds have been the anti-convulsive drugs, phenobarbital (PB), and phenytoin. Liver tumours induced by PB are dependent upon the activation of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). However, marked species differences in CAR activation by exogenous chemicals exist with some being much more potent activators of human CAR, e.g., 6-(4-chlorophenyl)imidazo[2,1-β][1,3]thiazole-5-carbaldehyde-O-(3,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxime (CITCO). We have compared CITCO-induced tumour formation in the livers of mice in which murine CAR has been replaced with its human counterpart. Our findings reveal that CITCO-dependent liver tumours are only formed in mice-expressing human CAR and not in wild-type animals. In addition, contrary to one of the proposed mechanisms of NGC carcinogenicity, we show that CITCO did not induce a hyperplastic response in the liver of the humanised mice. These data raise some key questions about the mechanism of action of NGCs and identify the limitations of current rodent carcinogenicity test systems in relation to risk assessment.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.