结构变化和结构断裂时期的政策制定:重新审视滚动窗口

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Nikolaos Giannellis, Stephen G. Hall, Georgios P. Kouretas, George S. Tavlas, Yongli Wang
{"title":"结构变化和结构断裂时期的政策制定:重新审视滚动窗口","authors":"Nikolaos Giannellis,&nbsp;Stephen G. Hall,&nbsp;Georgios P. Kouretas,&nbsp;George S. Tavlas,&nbsp;Yongli Wang","doi":"10.1002/for.3269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Early studies that used rolling windows found it to be a useful forecasting technique. These studies were, by-and-large, based on pre-2000 data, which were nonstationary. Subsequent work, based on stationary data from the mid-1990s to 2020, has not been able to confirm that finding. However, this latter result may reflect the fact that there was relatively little structural instability between the mid-1990s and 2020: The data had become stationary. Following the series of shocks of the early 2020s, this is no longer the case because the shocks produced nonstationarity in the macroeconomic data, such as inflation. Consequently, rolling windows may again be a sensible way forward. The present study assesses this conjecture.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47835,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forecasting","volume":"44 3","pages":"851-855"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policymaking in Periods of Structural Changes and Structural Breaks: Rolling Windows Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaos Giannellis,&nbsp;Stephen G. Hall,&nbsp;Georgios P. Kouretas,&nbsp;George S. Tavlas,&nbsp;Yongli Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/for.3269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Early studies that used rolling windows found it to be a useful forecasting technique. These studies were, by-and-large, based on pre-2000 data, which were nonstationary. Subsequent work, based on stationary data from the mid-1990s to 2020, has not been able to confirm that finding. However, this latter result may reflect the fact that there was relatively little structural instability between the mid-1990s and 2020: The data had become stationary. Following the series of shocks of the early 2020s, this is no longer the case because the shocks produced nonstationarity in the macroeconomic data, such as inflation. Consequently, rolling windows may again be a sensible way forward. The present study assesses this conjecture.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forecasting\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"851-855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forecasting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.3269\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.3269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早期使用滚动窗的研究发现这是一种有用的预测技术。总的来说,这些研究是基于2000年以前的数据,是非平稳的。随后的研究基于20世纪90年代中期至2020年的固定数据,未能证实这一发现。然而,后一种结果可能反映了这样一个事实,即在20世纪90年代中期至2020年期间,结构性不稳定性相对较小:数据已趋于平稳。在本世纪20年代初的一系列冲击之后,这种情况已不复存在,因为这些冲击导致了宏观经济数据(如通胀)的非平稳性。因此,摇窗可能又是一种明智的前进方式。本研究对这一猜想进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policymaking in Periods of Structural Changes and Structural Breaks: Rolling Windows Revisited

Early studies that used rolling windows found it to be a useful forecasting technique. These studies were, by-and-large, based on pre-2000 data, which were nonstationary. Subsequent work, based on stationary data from the mid-1990s to 2020, has not been able to confirm that finding. However, this latter result may reflect the fact that there was relatively little structural instability between the mid-1990s and 2020: The data had become stationary. Following the series of shocks of the early 2020s, this is no longer the case because the shocks produced nonstationarity in the macroeconomic data, such as inflation. Consequently, rolling windows may again be a sensible way forward. The present study assesses this conjecture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forecasting is an international journal that publishes refereed papers on forecasting. It is multidisciplinary, welcoming papers dealing with any aspect of forecasting: theoretical, practical, computational and methodological. A broad interpretation of the topic is taken with approaches from various subject areas, such as statistics, economics, psychology, systems engineering and social sciences, all encouraged. Furthermore, the Journal welcomes a wide diversity of applications in such fields as business, government, technology and the environment. Of particular interest are papers dealing with modelling issues and the relationship of forecasting systems to decision-making processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信