基于堆叠框架和SHAP模型的康萨巴蒂河流域土壤侵蚀带评价:机器学习方法的比较研究

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Javed Mallick, Saeed Alqadhi, Swapan Talukdar, Md Nawaj Sarif, Tania Nasrin, Hazem Ghassan Abdo
{"title":"基于堆叠框架和SHAP模型的康萨巴蒂河流域土壤侵蚀带评价:机器学习方法的比较研究","authors":"Javed Mallick,&nbsp;Saeed Alqadhi,&nbsp;Swapan Talukdar,&nbsp;Md Nawaj Sarif,&nbsp;Tania Nasrin,&nbsp;Hazem Ghassan Abdo","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01079-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil erosion is a major concern in the Kangsabati River basin, necessitating a comprehensive scientific approach for effective soil erosion management. This study aimed to predict soil erosion susceptibility zones in the basin using integrated soil erosion and deep learning (DL) based stacking framework. Additionally, the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) model was utilized to augment the interpretability of the DL model. The study employed the RUSLE model to estimate the soil loss. Through ArcGIS, 2000 erosion sites and 2000 non-erosion sites were randomly selected to generate an inventory map. The study considered 17 factors in four primary categories: topographic, climatic, soil, and land use/land cover (LULC). The Boruta algorithm assessed the importance of these variables. Random Forest (RF), (Deep Neural Networks) DNN, Convolution Neural Network (CNN), and stacking (Meta model) models were used to map soil erosion susceptibility based on the inventory map and controlling features. The RUSLE model revealed five erosion zones with soil loss rates ranging from very low (less than 9 t/ha/year) to very high (above 43 t/ha/year). The results demonstrated that 24.93% of the study area fell within the very high erosion susceptibility zone as predicted by DNN, while RF identified 34.32%, Meta model identified 24.84%, and CNN indicated 10.47% of the study area falling into the very high erosion susceptibility category. In terms of RMSE (value) and MSE, the Meta model demonstrates superior performance, whereas the DNN model excels in terms of MAE. The SHAP values output highlights the substantial impact of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), the K factor, soil moisture, and elevation on the DNN model. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing strategies and policies to combat soil erosion in the Kangsabati River basin, aiding targeted interventions and sustainable land management decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01079-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating soil erosion zones in the Kangsabati River basin using a stacking framework and SHAP model: a comparative study of machine learning approaches\",\"authors\":\"Javed Mallick,&nbsp;Saeed Alqadhi,&nbsp;Swapan Talukdar,&nbsp;Md Nawaj Sarif,&nbsp;Tania Nasrin,&nbsp;Hazem Ghassan Abdo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12302-025-01079-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil erosion is a major concern in the Kangsabati River basin, necessitating a comprehensive scientific approach for effective soil erosion management. This study aimed to predict soil erosion susceptibility zones in the basin using integrated soil erosion and deep learning (DL) based stacking framework. Additionally, the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) model was utilized to augment the interpretability of the DL model. The study employed the RUSLE model to estimate the soil loss. Through ArcGIS, 2000 erosion sites and 2000 non-erosion sites were randomly selected to generate an inventory map. The study considered 17 factors in four primary categories: topographic, climatic, soil, and land use/land cover (LULC). The Boruta algorithm assessed the importance of these variables. Random Forest (RF), (Deep Neural Networks) DNN, Convolution Neural Network (CNN), and stacking (Meta model) models were used to map soil erosion susceptibility based on the inventory map and controlling features. The RUSLE model revealed five erosion zones with soil loss rates ranging from very low (less than 9 t/ha/year) to very high (above 43 t/ha/year). The results demonstrated that 24.93% of the study area fell within the very high erosion susceptibility zone as predicted by DNN, while RF identified 34.32%, Meta model identified 24.84%, and CNN indicated 10.47% of the study area falling into the very high erosion susceptibility category. In terms of RMSE (value) and MSE, the Meta model demonstrates superior performance, whereas the DNN model excels in terms of MAE. The SHAP values output highlights the substantial impact of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), the K factor, soil moisture, and elevation on the DNN model. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing strategies and policies to combat soil erosion in the Kangsabati River basin, aiding targeted interventions and sustainable land management decisions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01079-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01079-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01079-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤侵蚀是康萨巴蒂河流域的主要问题,需要综合科学的方法进行有效的土壤侵蚀管理。利用基于土壤侵蚀和深度学习的综合叠加框架对流域土壤侵蚀敏感区进行预测。此外,利用SHapley加性解释(SHapley Additive exPlanations)模型来增强DL模型的可解释性。本研究采用RUSLE模型估算土壤流失量。通过ArcGIS,随机选取2000个侵蚀点和2000个非侵蚀点生成清查图。该研究考虑了地形、气候、土壤和土地利用/土地覆盖(LULC)等4个主要类别中的17个因素。Boruta算法评估了这些变量的重要性。采用随机森林(RF)、深度神经网络(DNN)、卷积神经网络(CNN)和堆叠(Meta模型)模型,基于盘存图和控制特征绘制土壤侵蚀敏感性图。RUSLE模型显示了5个侵蚀区,土壤流失率从极低(小于9 t/ha/年)到极高(大于43 t/ha/年)不等。结果表明,DNN预测的研究区有24.93%属于非常高侵蚀敏感性区,而RF预测为34.32%,Meta模型预测为24.84%,CNN预测为10.47%属于非常高侵蚀敏感性区。在RMSE (value)和MSE方面,Meta模型表现出优越的性能,而DNN模型在MAE方面表现出色。SHAP值的输出强调了土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC)、K因子、土壤湿度和海拔对DNN模型的实质性影响。这些发现为制定防治康萨巴蒂河流域土壤侵蚀的战略和政策提供了科学依据,有助于制定有针对性的干预措施和可持续土地管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating soil erosion zones in the Kangsabati River basin using a stacking framework and SHAP model: a comparative study of machine learning approaches

Soil erosion is a major concern in the Kangsabati River basin, necessitating a comprehensive scientific approach for effective soil erosion management. This study aimed to predict soil erosion susceptibility zones in the basin using integrated soil erosion and deep learning (DL) based stacking framework. Additionally, the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) model was utilized to augment the interpretability of the DL model. The study employed the RUSLE model to estimate the soil loss. Through ArcGIS, 2000 erosion sites and 2000 non-erosion sites were randomly selected to generate an inventory map. The study considered 17 factors in four primary categories: topographic, climatic, soil, and land use/land cover (LULC). The Boruta algorithm assessed the importance of these variables. Random Forest (RF), (Deep Neural Networks) DNN, Convolution Neural Network (CNN), and stacking (Meta model) models were used to map soil erosion susceptibility based on the inventory map and controlling features. The RUSLE model revealed five erosion zones with soil loss rates ranging from very low (less than 9 t/ha/year) to very high (above 43 t/ha/year). The results demonstrated that 24.93% of the study area fell within the very high erosion susceptibility zone as predicted by DNN, while RF identified 34.32%, Meta model identified 24.84%, and CNN indicated 10.47% of the study area falling into the very high erosion susceptibility category. In terms of RMSE (value) and MSE, the Meta model demonstrates superior performance, whereas the DNN model excels in terms of MAE. The SHAP values output highlights the substantial impact of Land Use and Land Cover (LULC), the K factor, soil moisture, and elevation on the DNN model. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing strategies and policies to combat soil erosion in the Kangsabati River basin, aiding targeted interventions and sustainable land management decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信