家庭暴露于潮湿和霉菌与儿童哮喘控制较差有关:champion asthma研究

Margaux Sauvere MD , Stéphanie Lejeune MD, PhD , Flore Chagnon MD , Elodie Drumez BSt , Camille Cisterne MD , Clémence Mordacq MD , Caroline Thumerelle MD , Manuela Scalbert MD , Armelle Le Mee MD , Mohamed Amani MD , Sawsan El Mourad MD , Sophie Enchery MD , Guillaume Pouessel MD , Juliette Roussel MD , Maxime Dartus MD , Hélène Behal BSt , Antoine Deschildre MD
{"title":"家庭暴露于潮湿和霉菌与儿童哮喘控制较差有关:champion asthma研究","authors":"Margaux Sauvere MD ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Lejeune MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Flore Chagnon MD ,&nbsp;Elodie Drumez BSt ,&nbsp;Camille Cisterne MD ,&nbsp;Clémence Mordacq MD ,&nbsp;Caroline Thumerelle MD ,&nbsp;Manuela Scalbert MD ,&nbsp;Armelle Le Mee MD ,&nbsp;Mohamed Amani MD ,&nbsp;Sawsan El Mourad MD ,&nbsp;Sophie Enchery MD ,&nbsp;Guillaume Pouessel MD ,&nbsp;Juliette Roussel MD ,&nbsp;Maxime Dartus MD ,&nbsp;Hélène Behal BSt ,&nbsp;Antoine Deschildre MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Deleterious indoor environment is a risk factor for poor asthma control in children.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We assessed the association between exposure to moisture and/or mold (EMM) and asthma control in children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The CHAMPIASTHMA study is a multicenter cross-sectional observational study. Children with recurrent wheeze/asthma aged 1 to 17 years were stratified by EMM, as assessed by a standardized questionnaire administered to their parents. The primary outcome was asthma control according to Global Initiative on Asthma guidelines. Secondary outcomes were: control according to asthma control test or pediatric asthma control test score, exacerbations (unscheduled visits, oral corticosteroid receipt, and hospitalization), asthma treatment step, and mold sensitization. Clinical trial registration: NCT04918394.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four hundred twenty-four patients were included, among whom 146 (34%) noted EMM. Patients with EMM more frequently had disease that was not controlled according to Global Initiative on Asthma guidelines (64 [45%] vs 90 [33%]; <em>P</em> = .03), and had lower asthma control test scores (22 [19-25] vs 24 [21-25]; <em>P</em> = .02), more frequent unscheduled visits (65 [45%] vs 86 [32%]; <em>P</em> = .02), and a trend for higher oral corticosteroids receipt in the past year (53 [37%] vs 74 [27%]; <em>P</em> = .09). There was no difference in asthma treatment step and hospitalization for exacerbations. Forty-two (12%) of 341 children were sensitized to molds, with no difference between the EMM and non-EMM groups (<em>P</em> = .85).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CHAMPIASTHMA study highlights that EMM is associated with poorer disease control and asthma outcomes in children. The search for EMM during scheduled visits should be systematic, especially in cases of uncontrolled asthma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75041,"journal":{"name":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home exposure to moisture and mold is associated with poorer asthma control in children: CHAMPIASTHMA study\",\"authors\":\"Margaux Sauvere MD ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Lejeune MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Flore Chagnon MD ,&nbsp;Elodie Drumez BSt ,&nbsp;Camille Cisterne MD ,&nbsp;Clémence Mordacq MD ,&nbsp;Caroline Thumerelle MD ,&nbsp;Manuela Scalbert MD ,&nbsp;Armelle Le Mee MD ,&nbsp;Mohamed Amani MD ,&nbsp;Sawsan El Mourad MD ,&nbsp;Sophie Enchery MD ,&nbsp;Guillaume Pouessel MD ,&nbsp;Juliette Roussel MD ,&nbsp;Maxime Dartus MD ,&nbsp;Hélène Behal BSt ,&nbsp;Antoine Deschildre MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Deleterious indoor environment is a risk factor for poor asthma control in children.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We assessed the association between exposure to moisture and/or mold (EMM) and asthma control in children.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The CHAMPIASTHMA study is a multicenter cross-sectional observational study. Children with recurrent wheeze/asthma aged 1 to 17 years were stratified by EMM, as assessed by a standardized questionnaire administered to their parents. The primary outcome was asthma control according to Global Initiative on Asthma guidelines. Secondary outcomes were: control according to asthma control test or pediatric asthma control test score, exacerbations (unscheduled visits, oral corticosteroid receipt, and hospitalization), asthma treatment step, and mold sensitization. Clinical trial registration: NCT04918394.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four hundred twenty-four patients were included, among whom 146 (34%) noted EMM. Patients with EMM more frequently had disease that was not controlled according to Global Initiative on Asthma guidelines (64 [45%] vs 90 [33%]; <em>P</em> = .03), and had lower asthma control test scores (22 [19-25] vs 24 [21-25]; <em>P</em> = .02), more frequent unscheduled visits (65 [45%] vs 86 [32%]; <em>P</em> = .02), and a trend for higher oral corticosteroids receipt in the past year (53 [37%] vs 74 [27%]; <em>P</em> = .09). There was no difference in asthma treatment step and hospitalization for exacerbations. Forty-two (12%) of 341 children were sensitized to molds, with no difference between the EMM and non-EMM groups (<em>P</em> = .85).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CHAMPIASTHMA study highlights that EMM is associated with poorer disease control and asthma outcomes in children. The search for EMM during scheduled visits should be systematic, especially in cases of uncontrolled asthma.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829325000165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772829325000165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景有害的室内环境是儿童哮喘控制不良的危险因素。目的评估儿童暴露于湿气和/或霉菌(EMM)与哮喘控制之间的关系。方法champion asthma研究是一项多中心横断面观察性研究。1至17岁的复发性喘息/哮喘儿童通过EMM分层,并通过对其父母的标准化问卷进行评估。根据全球哮喘倡议指南,主要结果是哮喘控制。次要结果是:根据哮喘控制试验或儿童哮喘控制试验评分、病情加重(计划外就诊、口服皮质类固醇和住院)、哮喘治疗步骤和霉菌致敏进行控制。临床试验注册:NCT04918394。结果共纳入424例患者,其中EMM 146例(34%)。EMM患者更经常患有未根据全球哮喘倡议指南得到控制的疾病(64例[45%]vs 90例[33%]);P = .03),哮喘控制测试得分较低(22 [19-25]vs 24 [21-25];P = .02),更频繁的计划外就诊(65例[45%]vs 86例[32%];P = .02),并且在过去一年中口服皮质类固醇的使用有增加的趋势(53例[37%]对74例[27%];P = .09)。哮喘治疗步骤和急性发作住院治疗没有差异。341名儿童中有42名(12%)对霉菌敏感,EMM组和非EMM组之间没有差异(P = 0.85)。champion asthma研究强调,EMM与儿童较差的疾病控制和哮喘结局相关。在预定的就诊期间寻找EMM应该是系统的,特别是在不受控制的哮喘病例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home exposure to moisture and mold is associated with poorer asthma control in children: CHAMPIASTHMA study

Background

Deleterious indoor environment is a risk factor for poor asthma control in children.

Objective

We assessed the association between exposure to moisture and/or mold (EMM) and asthma control in children.

Methods

The CHAMPIASTHMA study is a multicenter cross-sectional observational study. Children with recurrent wheeze/asthma aged 1 to 17 years were stratified by EMM, as assessed by a standardized questionnaire administered to their parents. The primary outcome was asthma control according to Global Initiative on Asthma guidelines. Secondary outcomes were: control according to asthma control test or pediatric asthma control test score, exacerbations (unscheduled visits, oral corticosteroid receipt, and hospitalization), asthma treatment step, and mold sensitization. Clinical trial registration: NCT04918394.

Results

Four hundred twenty-four patients were included, among whom 146 (34%) noted EMM. Patients with EMM more frequently had disease that was not controlled according to Global Initiative on Asthma guidelines (64 [45%] vs 90 [33%]; P = .03), and had lower asthma control test scores (22 [19-25] vs 24 [21-25]; P = .02), more frequent unscheduled visits (65 [45%] vs 86 [32%]; P = .02), and a trend for higher oral corticosteroids receipt in the past year (53 [37%] vs 74 [27%]; P = .09). There was no difference in asthma treatment step and hospitalization for exacerbations. Forty-two (12%) of 341 children were sensitized to molds, with no difference between the EMM and non-EMM groups (P = .85).

Conclusion

The CHAMPIASTHMA study highlights that EMM is associated with poorer disease control and asthma outcomes in children. The search for EMM during scheduled visits should be systematic, especially in cases of uncontrolled asthma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
92 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信