利用物理信息神经网络求解流体动力学复杂情况下的Navier-Stokes方程

IF 8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Tommaso Botarelli , Marco Fanfani , Paolo Nesi , Lorenzo Pinelli
{"title":"利用物理信息神经网络求解流体动力学复杂情况下的Navier-Stokes方程","authors":"Tommaso Botarelli ,&nbsp;Marco Fanfani ,&nbsp;Paolo Nesi ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Pinelli","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Navier-Stokes equations used to model fluid dynamic processes are fundamental to address several real-world problems related to energy production, aerospace applications, automotive design, industrial process, etc. However, since in most cases they do not admit any analytical solution, numerical simulations are required in industrial contexts to assess fluid dynamic behaviors in specific setups. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods, like those using finite volume or element approaches, are exploited to find Navier-Stokes solutions and carry out simulations. However, such methods require expensive hardware resources, relevant computational times, and manual efforts for the definition of dense meshes on which equations are evaluated iteratively for each time step of the simulation. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), which are deep neural networks where physical laws are directly embedded into the training process, offer a promising approach for solving Navier-Stokes equations, thus alleviating hardware and time requirements. PINNs bypass some CFD limitations by using neural networks to produce solutions based on governing equations, thus reducing the need for large datasets, dense meshing, and iterative estimation over time. This paper evaluates the application of PINNs in near real-world scenarios, while considering various geometries. The study focuses on the achieved accuracy, by comparing PINN estimates with CFD solutions obtained via OpenFOAM, and the required training times; this includes evaluating different neural network architectures, activation functions, and numbers of sampling points. Additionally, several training strategies such as fine-tuning, multi-resolution learning, and parametrized training are proposed to enhance efficiency and obtain speed up. Results demonstrate that PINNs can achieve comparable accuracy to CFD methods (with a velocity magnitude mean absolute error inferior to <span><math><mrow><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>) and significantly reduce computational costs. Our findings demonstrated that with appropriate training techniques PINNs can be effectively used in industrial applications requiring rapid and accurate fluid dynamic simulations, thus paving the way for their broader adoption in practical engineering problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 110347"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Physics-Informed neural networks for solving Navier-Stokes equations in fluid dynamic complex scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Tommaso Botarelli ,&nbsp;Marco Fanfani ,&nbsp;Paolo Nesi ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Pinelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Navier-Stokes equations used to model fluid dynamic processes are fundamental to address several real-world problems related to energy production, aerospace applications, automotive design, industrial process, etc. However, since in most cases they do not admit any analytical solution, numerical simulations are required in industrial contexts to assess fluid dynamic behaviors in specific setups. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods, like those using finite volume or element approaches, are exploited to find Navier-Stokes solutions and carry out simulations. However, such methods require expensive hardware resources, relevant computational times, and manual efforts for the definition of dense meshes on which equations are evaluated iteratively for each time step of the simulation. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), which are deep neural networks where physical laws are directly embedded into the training process, offer a promising approach for solving Navier-Stokes equations, thus alleviating hardware and time requirements. PINNs bypass some CFD limitations by using neural networks to produce solutions based on governing equations, thus reducing the need for large datasets, dense meshing, and iterative estimation over time. This paper evaluates the application of PINNs in near real-world scenarios, while considering various geometries. The study focuses on the achieved accuracy, by comparing PINN estimates with CFD solutions obtained via OpenFOAM, and the required training times; this includes evaluating different neural network architectures, activation functions, and numbers of sampling points. Additionally, several training strategies such as fine-tuning, multi-resolution learning, and parametrized training are proposed to enhance efficiency and obtain speed up. Results demonstrate that PINNs can achieve comparable accuracy to CFD methods (with a velocity magnitude mean absolute error inferior to <span><math><mrow><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>) and significantly reduce computational costs. Our findings demonstrated that with appropriate training techniques PINNs can be effectively used in industrial applications requiring rapid and accurate fluid dynamic simulations, thus paving the way for their broader adoption in practical engineering problems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"148 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625003471\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625003471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于模拟流体动力学过程的Navier-Stokes方程是解决与能源生产,航空航天应用,汽车设计,工业过程等相关的几个现实世界问题的基础。然而,由于在大多数情况下,它们不允许任何解析解,因此需要在工业环境中进行数值模拟,以评估特定设置中的流体动力学行为。计算流体动力学(CFD)方法,如使用有限体积或单元方法的方法,被用来寻找Navier-Stokes解并进行模拟。然而,这种方法需要昂贵的硬件资源,相关的计算时间,以及手动定义密集网格的努力,这些网格在模拟的每个时间步上迭代地评估方程。物理信息神经网络(pinn)是一种深度神经网络,它将物理定律直接嵌入到训练过程中,为解决Navier-Stokes方程提供了一种有前途的方法,从而减少了硬件和时间要求。pinn通过使用神经网络来产生基于控制方程的解决方案,从而绕过了一些CFD限制,从而减少了对大型数据集、密集网格和迭代估计的需求。本文在考虑各种几何形状的情况下,评估了pin - n在接近真实世界场景中的应用。通过比较PINN估计与通过OpenFOAM获得的CFD解决方案,以及所需的培训时间,研究重点是实现的准确性;这包括评估不同的神经网络架构、激活函数和采样点的数量。此外,还提出了微调、多分辨率学习和参数化训练等训练策略,以提高训练效率和速度。结果表明,PINNs可以达到与CFD方法相当的精度(速度量级平均绝对误差低于10−2),并显著降低计算成本。我们的研究结果表明,通过适当的训练技术,pinn可以有效地用于需要快速和准确的流体动力学模拟的工业应用,从而为其在实际工程问题中的广泛采用铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Physics-Informed neural networks for solving Navier-Stokes equations in fluid dynamic complex scenarios
Navier-Stokes equations used to model fluid dynamic processes are fundamental to address several real-world problems related to energy production, aerospace applications, automotive design, industrial process, etc. However, since in most cases they do not admit any analytical solution, numerical simulations are required in industrial contexts to assess fluid dynamic behaviors in specific setups. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods, like those using finite volume or element approaches, are exploited to find Navier-Stokes solutions and carry out simulations. However, such methods require expensive hardware resources, relevant computational times, and manual efforts for the definition of dense meshes on which equations are evaluated iteratively for each time step of the simulation. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), which are deep neural networks where physical laws are directly embedded into the training process, offer a promising approach for solving Navier-Stokes equations, thus alleviating hardware and time requirements. PINNs bypass some CFD limitations by using neural networks to produce solutions based on governing equations, thus reducing the need for large datasets, dense meshing, and iterative estimation over time. This paper evaluates the application of PINNs in near real-world scenarios, while considering various geometries. The study focuses on the achieved accuracy, by comparing PINN estimates with CFD solutions obtained via OpenFOAM, and the required training times; this includes evaluating different neural network architectures, activation functions, and numbers of sampling points. Additionally, several training strategies such as fine-tuning, multi-resolution learning, and parametrized training are proposed to enhance efficiency and obtain speed up. Results demonstrate that PINNs can achieve comparable accuracy to CFD methods (with a velocity magnitude mean absolute error inferior to 102) and significantly reduce computational costs. Our findings demonstrated that with appropriate training techniques PINNs can be effectively used in industrial applications requiring rapid and accurate fluid dynamic simulations, thus paving the way for their broader adoption in practical engineering problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信