院外心脏骤停无st段抬高成功复苏后患者的早期风险分层——院外心脏骤停无st段抬高后血管造影(TOMAHAWK)风险评分

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-03-05 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001221
Tharusan Thevathasan, Eva Spoormans, Ibrahim Akin, Georg Fuernau, Ulrich Tebbe, Karl Georg Haeusler, Michael Oeff, Christian Hassager, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Uwe Zeymer, Janine Pöss, Michelle Roßberg, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Alexander Jobs, Suzanne de Waha, Jorrit Lemkes, Holger Thiele, Carsten Skurk, Anne Freund, Steffen Desch
{"title":"院外心脏骤停无st段抬高成功复苏后患者的早期风险分层——院外心脏骤停无st段抬高后血管造影(TOMAHAWK)风险评分","authors":"Tharusan Thevathasan, Eva Spoormans, Ibrahim Akin, Georg Fuernau, Ulrich Tebbe, Karl Georg Haeusler, Michael Oeff, Christian Hassager, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Uwe Zeymer, Janine Pöss, Michelle Roßberg, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Alexander Jobs, Suzanne de Waha, Jorrit Lemkes, Holger Thiele, Carsten Skurk, Anne Freund, Steffen Desch","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Existing scores for risk stratification after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are either medically outdated, limited to registry data, small cohorts, and certain healthcare systems only, or include rather complex calculations. The objective of this study was to develop an easy-to-use risk prediction score for short-term mortality in patients with successfully resuscitated OHCA without ST-segment elevation on the post-resuscitation electrocardiogram, derived from the Angiography after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation (TOMAHAWK) trial. The risk score was externally validated in the Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest Trial (COACT) cohort (shockable arrest rhythms only) and additional hospitals from Berlin, Germany (shockable and nonshockable arrest rhythms).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Predefined subanalysis of the TOMAHAWK trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Development and external validation across 52 centers in three countries.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with successfully resuscitated OHCA and no ST-segment elevations.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Utilization of the TOMAHAWK risk score upon hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The risk score was developed using a backward stepwise regression analysis. Between one and four points were attributed to each variable in the risk score, resulting in a score with three risk categories for 30-day mortality: low (0-2), intermediate (3-6), and high (7-10). Five variables emerged as independent predictors for 30-day mortality and were used as risk score parameters: age of 72 years old or older, known diabetes, unshockable initial electrocardiogram rhythm, time until return of spontaneous circulation greater than or equal to 23 minutes, and admission arterial lactate level greater than or equal to 8 mmol/L. The 30-day mortality rates for each risk category were 23.6%, 68.8%, and 86.2%, respectively (p < 0.001) with a good discrimination at an area under the curve of 0.82. External validation in the COACT and Berlin cohorts showed short-term mortality rates of 23.1% and 20.4% (score 0-2), 44.8% and 48.1% (score 3-6), and 78.9% and 73.3% (score 7-10), respectively (each p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TOMAHAWK risk score can be easily calculated in daily clinical practice and strongly correlated with mortality in patients with successfully resuscitated OHCA without ST-segment elevation on post-resuscitation electrocardiogram.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 3","pages":"e1221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Risk Stratification of Patients After Successfully Resuscitated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without ST-Segment Elevation-The Angiography After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without ST-Segment Elevation (TOMAHAWK) Risk Score.\",\"authors\":\"Tharusan Thevathasan, Eva Spoormans, Ibrahim Akin, Georg Fuernau, Ulrich Tebbe, Karl Georg Haeusler, Michael Oeff, Christian Hassager, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Uwe Zeymer, Janine Pöss, Michelle Roßberg, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Alexander Jobs, Suzanne de Waha, Jorrit Lemkes, Holger Thiele, Carsten Skurk, Anne Freund, Steffen Desch\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Existing scores for risk stratification after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are either medically outdated, limited to registry data, small cohorts, and certain healthcare systems only, or include rather complex calculations. The objective of this study was to develop an easy-to-use risk prediction score for short-term mortality in patients with successfully resuscitated OHCA without ST-segment elevation on the post-resuscitation electrocardiogram, derived from the Angiography after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation (TOMAHAWK) trial. The risk score was externally validated in the Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest Trial (COACT) cohort (shockable arrest rhythms only) and additional hospitals from Berlin, Germany (shockable and nonshockable arrest rhythms).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Predefined subanalysis of the TOMAHAWK trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Development and external validation across 52 centers in three countries.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with successfully resuscitated OHCA and no ST-segment elevations.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Utilization of the TOMAHAWK risk score upon hospital admission.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The risk score was developed using a backward stepwise regression analysis. Between one and four points were attributed to each variable in the risk score, resulting in a score with three risk categories for 30-day mortality: low (0-2), intermediate (3-6), and high (7-10). Five variables emerged as independent predictors for 30-day mortality and were used as risk score parameters: age of 72 years old or older, known diabetes, unshockable initial electrocardiogram rhythm, time until return of spontaneous circulation greater than or equal to 23 minutes, and admission arterial lactate level greater than or equal to 8 mmol/L. The 30-day mortality rates for each risk category were 23.6%, 68.8%, and 86.2%, respectively (p < 0.001) with a good discrimination at an area under the curve of 0.82. External validation in the COACT and Berlin cohorts showed short-term mortality rates of 23.1% and 20.4% (score 0-2), 44.8% and 48.1% (score 3-6), and 78.9% and 73.3% (score 7-10), respectively (each p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TOMAHAWK risk score can be easily calculated in daily clinical practice and strongly correlated with mortality in patients with successfully resuscitated OHCA without ST-segment elevation on post-resuscitation electrocardiogram.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"e1221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884833/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后风险分层的现有评分要么在医学上已经过时,仅限于登记数据、小队列和某些医疗保健系统,要么包括相当复杂的计算。本研究的目的是开发一个易于使用的风险预测评分,用于复苏后心电图上无st段抬高的OHCA成功复苏患者的短期死亡率,该评分来源于无st段抬高的院外心脏骤停后血管造影(TOMAHAWK)试验。风险评分在心脏骤停后冠状动脉造影试验(COACT)队列(仅限震荡性骤停节律)和来自德国柏林的其他医院(震荡性和非震荡性骤停节律)中进行外部验证。设计:预先对TOMAHAWK试验进行亚分析。环境:在三个国家的52个中心进行开发和外部验证。患者:OHCA复苏成功且无st段抬高的成年患者。干预措施:在入院时使用TOMAHAWK风险评分。测量方法和主要结果:风险评分采用后向逐步回归分析。风险评分中的每个变量得分在1到4分之间,从而得出30天死亡率的三个风险类别:低(0-2)、中(3-6)和高(7-10)。有5个变量作为30天死亡率的独立预测因子,并被用作风险评分参数:年龄72岁及以上、已知糖尿病、无休克初始心电图节律、自发循环恢复时间大于等于23分钟、入院动脉乳酸水平大于等于8 mmol/L。各危险类别的30天死亡率分别为23.6%、68.8%和86.2% (p < 0.001),曲线下面积为0.82,判别性较好。COACT和Berlin队列的外部验证显示,短期死亡率分别为23.1%和20.4%(评分0-2),44.8%和48.1%(评分3-6),78.9%和73.3%(评分7-10)(p均< 0.001)。结论:在日常临床实践中,TOMAHAWK风险评分易于计算,且在复苏后心电图无st段抬高的OHCA成功复苏患者中,TOMAHAWK风险评分与死亡率密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Risk Stratification of Patients After Successfully Resuscitated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without ST-Segment Elevation-The Angiography After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without ST-Segment Elevation (TOMAHAWK) Risk Score.

Objectives: Existing scores for risk stratification after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are either medically outdated, limited to registry data, small cohorts, and certain healthcare systems only, or include rather complex calculations. The objective of this study was to develop an easy-to-use risk prediction score for short-term mortality in patients with successfully resuscitated OHCA without ST-segment elevation on the post-resuscitation electrocardiogram, derived from the Angiography after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation (TOMAHAWK) trial. The risk score was externally validated in the Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest Trial (COACT) cohort (shockable arrest rhythms only) and additional hospitals from Berlin, Germany (shockable and nonshockable arrest rhythms).

Design: Predefined subanalysis of the TOMAHAWK trial.

Setting: Development and external validation across 52 centers in three countries.

Patients: Adult patients with successfully resuscitated OHCA and no ST-segment elevations.

Interventions: Utilization of the TOMAHAWK risk score upon hospital admission.

Measurements and main results: The risk score was developed using a backward stepwise regression analysis. Between one and four points were attributed to each variable in the risk score, resulting in a score with three risk categories for 30-day mortality: low (0-2), intermediate (3-6), and high (7-10). Five variables emerged as independent predictors for 30-day mortality and were used as risk score parameters: age of 72 years old or older, known diabetes, unshockable initial electrocardiogram rhythm, time until return of spontaneous circulation greater than or equal to 23 minutes, and admission arterial lactate level greater than or equal to 8 mmol/L. The 30-day mortality rates for each risk category were 23.6%, 68.8%, and 86.2%, respectively (p < 0.001) with a good discrimination at an area under the curve of 0.82. External validation in the COACT and Berlin cohorts showed short-term mortality rates of 23.1% and 20.4% (score 0-2), 44.8% and 48.1% (score 3-6), and 78.9% and 73.3% (score 7-10), respectively (each p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The TOMAHAWK risk score can be easily calculated in daily clinical practice and strongly correlated with mortality in patients with successfully resuscitated OHCA without ST-segment elevation on post-resuscitation electrocardiogram.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信