脉冲场消融治疗心房颤动。

Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2025.2475239
Vedran Pašara, Tommaso Sattin, Carlo De Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Gezim Bala
{"title":"脉冲场消融治疗心房颤动。","authors":"Vedran Pašara, Tommaso Sattin, Carlo De Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Gezim Bala","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2475239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia, associated with substantial morbidity and a reduced quality of life. The current standard of care, transcatheter pulmonary vein isolation using thermal ablation techniques, provides symptom relief but carries a risk of collateral tissue damage. In recent years, pulsed field ablation, a nonthermal technique based on irreversible electroporation, has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional thermal ablation methods.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides an overview of pulsed field ablation, a novel nonthermal ablation technique. We briefly explain its biophysical principles and general technical aspects, describe currently available technologies, and summarize findings from clinical studies. Additionally, we discuss its safety profile, unresolved issues, and limitations, while also exploring future perspectives.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Pulsed field ablation offers distinct advantages over traditional thermal ablation methods, such as shorter procedure times and a favorable safety profile due to precise tissue targeting. Future improvements in ablation device design, energy delivery settings, integration with mapping systems, workflow efficiency, ablation protocols, and patient selection criteria are expected to further enhance clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"311-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Vedran Pašara, Tommaso Sattin, Carlo De Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Gezim Bala\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2025.2475239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia, associated with substantial morbidity and a reduced quality of life. The current standard of care, transcatheter pulmonary vein isolation using thermal ablation techniques, provides symptom relief but carries a risk of collateral tissue damage. In recent years, pulsed field ablation, a nonthermal technique based on irreversible electroporation, has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional thermal ablation methods.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides an overview of pulsed field ablation, a novel nonthermal ablation technique. We briefly explain its biophysical principles and general technical aspects, describe currently available technologies, and summarize findings from clinical studies. Additionally, we discuss its safety profile, unresolved issues, and limitations, while also exploring future perspectives.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Pulsed field ablation offers distinct advantages over traditional thermal ablation methods, such as shorter procedure times and a favorable safety profile due to precise tissue targeting. Future improvements in ablation device design, energy delivery settings, integration with mapping systems, workflow efficiency, ablation protocols, and patient selection criteria are expected to further enhance clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"311-320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2475239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2475239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

房颤是最常见的持续性心律失常,发病率高,生活质量下降。目前的治疗标准是使用热消融技术进行经导管肺静脉隔离,可以缓解症状,但有附带组织损伤的风险。近年来,脉冲场烧蚀作为一种基于不可逆电穿孔的非热技术,已成为传统热烧蚀方法的一种有前景的替代方法。涉及领域:本文综述了脉冲场消融这一新兴的非热消融技术。我们简要解释其生物物理原理和一般技术方面,描述当前可用的技术,并总结临床研究的结果。此外,我们讨论了它的安全性、未解决的问题和局限性,同时也探讨了未来的前景。专家意见:与传统的热消融方法相比,脉冲场消融具有明显的优势,例如手术时间更短,由于精确的组织靶向,具有良好的安全性。未来在消融设备设计、能量输送设置、与制图系统集成、工作流程效率、消融方案和患者选择标准方面的改进有望进一步提高临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia, associated with substantial morbidity and a reduced quality of life. The current standard of care, transcatheter pulmonary vein isolation using thermal ablation techniques, provides symptom relief but carries a risk of collateral tissue damage. In recent years, pulsed field ablation, a nonthermal technique based on irreversible electroporation, has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional thermal ablation methods.

Areas covered: This review provides an overview of pulsed field ablation, a novel nonthermal ablation technique. We briefly explain its biophysical principles and general technical aspects, describe currently available technologies, and summarize findings from clinical studies. Additionally, we discuss its safety profile, unresolved issues, and limitations, while also exploring future perspectives.

Expert opinion: Pulsed field ablation offers distinct advantages over traditional thermal ablation methods, such as shorter procedure times and a favorable safety profile due to precise tissue targeting. Future improvements in ablation device design, energy delivery settings, integration with mapping systems, workflow efficiency, ablation protocols, and patient selection criteria are expected to further enhance clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信