ACL + ALL重建恢复正常的膝关节稳定性,不会导致外侧疼痛或外侧过度劳损的迹象。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1055/a-2503-6766
David Insam, Florian Perwanger, Lorenz Fritsch, Philipp Ahrens, Jeske Christian, Stefan Hinterwimmer
{"title":"ACL + ALL重建恢复正常的膝关节稳定性,不会导致外侧疼痛或外侧过度劳损的迹象。","authors":"David Insam, Florian Perwanger, Lorenz Fritsch, Philipp Ahrens, Jeske Christian, Stefan Hinterwimmer","doi":"10.1055/a-2503-6766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ACL rupture is a common injury in recreational and professional athletes. Most ACL tears occur in combination with an ALL lesion. Combined reconstruction of the ACL and ALL reduces re-rupture rates by up to 3.1 times compared to isolated ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons; however, it has not yet been established as the surgical standard. The purpose of this study was to investigate if patients benefit from ACL+ALL reconstruction in terms of translation and rotation stability, return to activity and return to sport, as well as to assess any potential negative effects of this technique.This is a multicentric study of retrospectively collected patients who were followed up 12.7 months postoperatively. The patient sample consisted of 55 patients (group 1: n=29, Munich/Germany, ACL+ALL, femoral ALL fixation with interference screw, and group 2: n=26, Bolzano/Italy, ACL+ALL, femoral ALL-fixation with SwiveLock). Clinical outcomes were evaluated through instrumental measurements with two different devices to assess translational anteroposterior and rotational stability and through patient-reported outcome measures (Lysholm Score, Activity Rating Scale, Tegner Score, VAS (PROMs)).A total of 55 patients (mean (± SD) age: 24.7 ± 7.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 1.5 months were included. The mean anterior translation of all operated (ACL+ALL) knees was 3.2 ± 1.1 mm and was not significantly different from the values of the non-operated knees (2.6 ± 1.0 mm). The results of the anterior drawer test in internal rotation were 3.3 ± 1.1 mm for the operated knee vs. 2.7 ± 1.0 mm for the non-operated knee (p=0.0014). There were no further significant differences between the operated and non-operated knee regarding translation or internal and external rotation. The mean value for pain on the lateral side of the knee was 1.1 ± 1.3 on the VAS 0-10 pain scale. All other PROMs showed no relevant differences between pre-injury and post-operative.ALL reconstruction restores the function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. In this study, knee joint stability regarding anteroposterior translation and rotation showed values almost identical to those of the healthy non-operated contralateral knee. It leads to excellent patient outcomes with near pre-injury levels regarding the relevant PROMs. In particular, combined reconstruction did not result in any clinically significant negative side-effects such as pain on the ALL incision site or signs of overstrain in the lateral knee.</p>","PeriodicalId":51169,"journal":{"name":"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden","volume":"39 1","pages":"16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACL plus ALL reconstruction restores normal knee stability and does not lead to lateral pain or signs of lateral overstrain.\",\"authors\":\"David Insam, Florian Perwanger, Lorenz Fritsch, Philipp Ahrens, Jeske Christian, Stefan Hinterwimmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2503-6766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ACL rupture is a common injury in recreational and professional athletes. Most ACL tears occur in combination with an ALL lesion. Combined reconstruction of the ACL and ALL reduces re-rupture rates by up to 3.1 times compared to isolated ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons; however, it has not yet been established as the surgical standard. The purpose of this study was to investigate if patients benefit from ACL+ALL reconstruction in terms of translation and rotation stability, return to activity and return to sport, as well as to assess any potential negative effects of this technique.This is a multicentric study of retrospectively collected patients who were followed up 12.7 months postoperatively. The patient sample consisted of 55 patients (group 1: n=29, Munich/Germany, ACL+ALL, femoral ALL fixation with interference screw, and group 2: n=26, Bolzano/Italy, ACL+ALL, femoral ALL-fixation with SwiveLock). Clinical outcomes were evaluated through instrumental measurements with two different devices to assess translational anteroposterior and rotational stability and through patient-reported outcome measures (Lysholm Score, Activity Rating Scale, Tegner Score, VAS (PROMs)).A total of 55 patients (mean (± SD) age: 24.7 ± 7.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 1.5 months were included. The mean anterior translation of all operated (ACL+ALL) knees was 3.2 ± 1.1 mm and was not significantly different from the values of the non-operated knees (2.6 ± 1.0 mm). The results of the anterior drawer test in internal rotation were 3.3 ± 1.1 mm for the operated knee vs. 2.7 ± 1.0 mm for the non-operated knee (p=0.0014). There were no further significant differences between the operated and non-operated knee regarding translation or internal and external rotation. The mean value for pain on the lateral side of the knee was 1.1 ± 1.3 on the VAS 0-10 pain scale. All other PROMs showed no relevant differences between pre-injury and post-operative.ALL reconstruction restores the function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. In this study, knee joint stability regarding anteroposterior translation and rotation showed values almost identical to those of the healthy non-operated contralateral knee. It leads to excellent patient outcomes with near pre-injury levels regarding the relevant PROMs. In particular, combined reconstruction did not result in any clinically significant negative side-effects such as pain on the ALL incision site or signs of overstrain in the lateral knee.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"16-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2503-6766\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sportverletzung-Sportschaden","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2503-6766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前交叉韧带断裂是一种常见的损伤在娱乐和职业运动员。大多数前交叉韧带撕裂合并ALL病变。与使用腘绳肌腱重建孤立的前交叉韧带相比,联合重建前交叉韧带和ALL可减少再破裂率达3.1倍;然而,它尚未被确立为外科标准。本研究的目的是调查患者是否受益于ACL+ALL重建在平移和旋转稳定性,恢复活动和恢复运动方面,以及评估该技术的任何潜在负面影响。这是一项多中心研究,回顾性收集了术后12.7个月随访的患者。患者样本包括55例患者(组1:n=29,慕尼黑/德国,ACL+ALL,用干涉螺钉固定股骨ALL;组2:n=26, Bolzano/意大利,ACL+ALL,用SwiveLock固定股骨ALL)。临床结果通过两种不同设备的仪器测量来评估平移前后位和旋转稳定性,并通过患者报告的结果测量(Lysholm评分、活动评定量表、Tegner评分、VAS (PROMs))来评估。共纳入55例患者(平均(±SD)年龄:24.7±7.8岁),平均随访12.7±1.5个月。所有手术膝关节(ACL+ all)的平均前平移量为3.2±1.1 mm,与未手术膝关节(2.6±1.0 mm)差异无统计学意义。内旋前抽屉试验结果,手术膝关节为3.3±1.1 mm,未手术膝关节为2.7±1.0 mm (p=0.0014)。手术和未手术的膝关节在平移或内外旋转方面没有进一步的显著差异。在VAS 0-10疼痛评分中,膝关节外侧疼痛的平均值为1.1±1.3。所有其他PROMs在损伤前和术后无相关差异。ALL重建恢复膝关节前外侧韧带的功能。在本研究中,关于前后平移和旋转的膝关节稳定性显示的值几乎与未手术的健康对侧膝关节相同。它可以使患者的预后达到接近损伤前水平的相关prom。特别是,联合重建没有导致任何临床显著的负面副作用,如ALL切口部位疼痛或外侧膝关节过度劳损的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ACL plus ALL reconstruction restores normal knee stability and does not lead to lateral pain or signs of lateral overstrain.

ACL rupture is a common injury in recreational and professional athletes. Most ACL tears occur in combination with an ALL lesion. Combined reconstruction of the ACL and ALL reduces re-rupture rates by up to 3.1 times compared to isolated ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons; however, it has not yet been established as the surgical standard. The purpose of this study was to investigate if patients benefit from ACL+ALL reconstruction in terms of translation and rotation stability, return to activity and return to sport, as well as to assess any potential negative effects of this technique.This is a multicentric study of retrospectively collected patients who were followed up 12.7 months postoperatively. The patient sample consisted of 55 patients (group 1: n=29, Munich/Germany, ACL+ALL, femoral ALL fixation with interference screw, and group 2: n=26, Bolzano/Italy, ACL+ALL, femoral ALL-fixation with SwiveLock). Clinical outcomes were evaluated through instrumental measurements with two different devices to assess translational anteroposterior and rotational stability and through patient-reported outcome measures (Lysholm Score, Activity Rating Scale, Tegner Score, VAS (PROMs)).A total of 55 patients (mean (± SD) age: 24.7 ± 7.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 1.5 months were included. The mean anterior translation of all operated (ACL+ALL) knees was 3.2 ± 1.1 mm and was not significantly different from the values of the non-operated knees (2.6 ± 1.0 mm). The results of the anterior drawer test in internal rotation were 3.3 ± 1.1 mm for the operated knee vs. 2.7 ± 1.0 mm for the non-operated knee (p=0.0014). There were no further significant differences between the operated and non-operated knee regarding translation or internal and external rotation. The mean value for pain on the lateral side of the knee was 1.1 ± 1.3 on the VAS 0-10 pain scale. All other PROMs showed no relevant differences between pre-injury and post-operative.ALL reconstruction restores the function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. In this study, knee joint stability regarding anteroposterior translation and rotation showed values almost identical to those of the healthy non-operated contralateral knee. It leads to excellent patient outcomes with near pre-injury levels regarding the relevant PROMs. In particular, combined reconstruction did not result in any clinically significant negative side-effects such as pain on the ALL incision site or signs of overstrain in the lateral knee.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden
Sportverletzung-Sportschaden 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ihr Forum - Die Zeitschrift Sportverletzung-Sportschaden Infos von A bis Z: Grundlagen, Prävention und Rehabilitation Topaktuelle Themen: Abbildung der Verletzungen/Prävention bei Trendsportarten Vielfältiges Spektrum: Physiotherapie, Wissenschaft und angewandte Forschung, neue Produkte und Hilfsmittel Aktuelle Themen mit echtem Nutzwert Sporttraumatologie: Prävention, Therapie, Rehabilitation Sportphysiotherapie: Grundlagen, Biomechanik, Manuelle Therapie, Funktionelle Therapie, Trainingstherapie im Sport, Geräte, Trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信