Paige前列腺检测人工智能辅助在前列腺活检中检测前列腺癌的前瞻性临床实施:人工智能辅助前列腺癌检测的试验实施。

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00193
Rachel N Flach, Carmen van Dooijeweert, Tri Q Nguyen, Mitchell Lynch, Trudy N Jonges, Richard P Meijer, Britt B M Suelmann, Peter-Paul M Willemse, Nikolas Stathonikos, Paul J van Diest
{"title":"Paige前列腺检测人工智能辅助在前列腺活检中检测前列腺癌的前瞻性临床实施:人工智能辅助前列腺癌检测的试验实施。","authors":"Rachel N Flach, Carmen van Dooijeweert, Tri Q Nguyen, Mitchell Lynch, Trudy N Jonges, Richard P Meijer, Britt B M Suelmann, Peter-Paul M Willemse, Nikolas Stathonikos, Paul J van Diest","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pathologists diagnose prostate cancer (PCa) on hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained sections of prostate needle biopsies (PBx). Some laboratories use costly immunohistochemistry (IHC) for all cases to optimize workflow, often exceeding reimbursement for the full specimen. Despite the rise in digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, clinical implementation studies are scarce. This prospective clinical trial evaluated whether an AI-assisted workflow for detecting PCa in PBx reduces IHC use while maintaining diagnostic safety standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients suspected of PCa were allocated biweekly to either a control or intervention arm. In the control arm, pathologists assessed whole-slide images (WSI) of PBx using HE and IHC stainings. In the intervention arm, pathologists used the Paige Prostate Detect AI algorithm on HE slides, requesting IHC only as needed. IHC was requested for all morphologically negative slides in the AI arm. The main outcome was the relative risk (RR) of IHC use per detected PCa case at both patient and WSI levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 143 of 237 (60.3%) slides of 64 of 82 patients contained PCa (78.0%). AI assistance significantly reduced the risk of IHC use per detected PCa case at both the patient level (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.72) and slide level (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.52). Cost reductions on IHC were €1,700 for the trial, at €50 per IHC stain. AI-assisted pathologists reported higher confidence in their diagnoses (80% <i>v</i> 56% confident or high confidence). The median assessment time per HE slide showed no significant difference between the AI-assisted and control arms (139 seconds <i>v</i> 112 seconds; <i>P</i> = .2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that AI assistance for PCa detection in PBx significantly reduces IHC costs while maintaining diagnostic safety standards, supporting the business case for AI implementation in PCa detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Clinical Implementation of Paige Prostate Detect Artificial Intelligence Assistance in the Detection of Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsies: CONFIDENT P Trial Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Assistance in Prostate Cancer Detection.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel N Flach, Carmen van Dooijeweert, Tri Q Nguyen, Mitchell Lynch, Trudy N Jonges, Richard P Meijer, Britt B M Suelmann, Peter-Paul M Willemse, Nikolas Stathonikos, Paul J van Diest\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/CCI-24-00193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pathologists diagnose prostate cancer (PCa) on hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained sections of prostate needle biopsies (PBx). Some laboratories use costly immunohistochemistry (IHC) for all cases to optimize workflow, often exceeding reimbursement for the full specimen. Despite the rise in digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, clinical implementation studies are scarce. This prospective clinical trial evaluated whether an AI-assisted workflow for detecting PCa in PBx reduces IHC use while maintaining diagnostic safety standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients suspected of PCa were allocated biweekly to either a control or intervention arm. In the control arm, pathologists assessed whole-slide images (WSI) of PBx using HE and IHC stainings. In the intervention arm, pathologists used the Paige Prostate Detect AI algorithm on HE slides, requesting IHC only as needed. IHC was requested for all morphologically negative slides in the AI arm. The main outcome was the relative risk (RR) of IHC use per detected PCa case at both patient and WSI levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 143 of 237 (60.3%) slides of 64 of 82 patients contained PCa (78.0%). AI assistance significantly reduced the risk of IHC use per detected PCa case at both the patient level (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.72) and slide level (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.52). Cost reductions on IHC were €1,700 for the trial, at €50 per IHC stain. AI-assisted pathologists reported higher confidence in their diagnoses (80% <i>v</i> 56% confident or high confidence). The median assessment time per HE slide showed no significant difference between the AI-assisted and control arms (139 seconds <i>v</i> 112 seconds; <i>P</i> = .2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that AI assistance for PCa detection in PBx significantly reduces IHC costs while maintaining diagnostic safety standards, supporting the business case for AI implementation in PCa detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2400193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:病理学家通过前列腺穿刺活检(PBx)的苏木精和伊红(HE)染色切片诊断前列腺癌(PCa)。一些实验室对所有病例使用昂贵的免疫组织化学(IHC)来优化工作流程,通常超过整个标本的报销。尽管数字病理学和人工智能(AI)算法的兴起,但临床实施研究却很少。这项前瞻性临床试验评估了人工智能辅助工作流程是否可以在保持诊断安全标准的同时减少PBx中PCa的使用。方法:疑似PCa的患者每两周被分配到对照组或干预组。在对照组,病理学家使用HE和IHC染色评估PBx的全片图像(WSI)。在干预组,病理学家在HE切片上使用Paige前列腺检测人工智能算法,仅在需要时要求进行免疫组化。要求对人工智能臂的所有形态学阴性玻片进行免疫组化检查。主要结果是在患者和WSI水平上,每个检测到的PCa病例使用IHC的相对风险(RR)。结果:总体而言,82例患者中64例的237张载玻片中有143张(60.3%)含有PCa(78.0%)。人工智能辅助显著降低了每个检测到的PCa病例在患者水平上使用免疫组化的风险(RR, 0.55;95% CI, 0.39 ~ 0.72)和滑动水平(RR, 0.41;95% CI, 0.29 - 0.52)。该试验的IHC成本降低了1700欧元,每个IHC染色成本为50欧元。人工智能辅助的病理学家报告对他们的诊断有更高的信心(80%对56%自信或高度自信)。每张HE切片的中位评估时间在人工智能辅助组和对照组之间没有显著差异(139秒vs 112秒;P = .2)。结论:本研究表明,人工智能辅助PBx中PCa检测显著降低了IHC成本,同时保持了诊断安全标准,支持人工智能在PCa检测中实施的商业案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Clinical Implementation of Paige Prostate Detect Artificial Intelligence Assistance in the Detection of Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsies: CONFIDENT P Trial Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Assistance in Prostate Cancer Detection.

Purpose: Pathologists diagnose prostate cancer (PCa) on hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained sections of prostate needle biopsies (PBx). Some laboratories use costly immunohistochemistry (IHC) for all cases to optimize workflow, often exceeding reimbursement for the full specimen. Despite the rise in digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, clinical implementation studies are scarce. This prospective clinical trial evaluated whether an AI-assisted workflow for detecting PCa in PBx reduces IHC use while maintaining diagnostic safety standards.

Methods: Patients suspected of PCa were allocated biweekly to either a control or intervention arm. In the control arm, pathologists assessed whole-slide images (WSI) of PBx using HE and IHC stainings. In the intervention arm, pathologists used the Paige Prostate Detect AI algorithm on HE slides, requesting IHC only as needed. IHC was requested for all morphologically negative slides in the AI arm. The main outcome was the relative risk (RR) of IHC use per detected PCa case at both patient and WSI levels.

Results: Overall, 143 of 237 (60.3%) slides of 64 of 82 patients contained PCa (78.0%). AI assistance significantly reduced the risk of IHC use per detected PCa case at both the patient level (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.72) and slide level (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.52). Cost reductions on IHC were €1,700 for the trial, at €50 per IHC stain. AI-assisted pathologists reported higher confidence in their diagnoses (80% v 56% confident or high confidence). The median assessment time per HE slide showed no significant difference between the AI-assisted and control arms (139 seconds v 112 seconds; P = .2).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that AI assistance for PCa detection in PBx significantly reduces IHC costs while maintaining diagnostic safety standards, supporting the business case for AI implementation in PCa detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信