{"title":"评估2010-2020年以色列国家卫生政策研究所资助的研究的质量。","authors":"Dan Even, Moshe Leshno, Avi Porath","doi":"10.1186/s13584-025-00672-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research is the basis of advancement in health and wellbeing in modern societies. Our study aims to examine the funding policy of the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research (NIHP), a national foundation responsible for assessing the impact of the national Health Insurance Law on health services in Israel. The study aims to evaluate the studies funded from 2010 to 2020, considering their publication in scientific literature and other channels that may influence decision-makers. We compare findings to a previous internal examination of studies funded by the NIHP during 1996-2014. Our paper presents an approach for measuring the impact of health policy research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 378 studies funded by NIHP during the specified years were identified. Objective data were gathered by investigating scientific literature across three datasets: Web of Science (WOS), PubMed, and Google Scholar, including journal impact factor, quarterly index, and citation metrics. Concurrently, a questionnaire was developed to collect additional and subjective data from principal investigators of the funded research projects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the final sample of 364 studies funded by NIHP from 2010 to 2020, after 11 were cancelled, and 3 were duplicates. 436 publications were retrieved in peer-reviewed journals. The average time elapsed from funding to scientific publication was 4.65 years. Metric parameters for the top publications of 231 funded studies with at least one publication in peer-reviewed journals revealed an average journal impact factor of 5.97 points and an average of 7.82 citations according to WOS and 14 citations according to Google Scholar. A comparison to 459 funded studies from 1996 to 2014 found a twofold increase in the impact factor. Nearly half of the principal investigators reported some influence on policy processes in the questionnaires, and the majority of the studies were also reported in popular media outlets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study provides an overview of the quality and potential influence of studies funded by NIHP, dedicated to supporting research in the field of health policy in Israel. Some of the findings are supported by results from similar inquiries. Several recommendations are introduced to enhance the quality and impact of the funded studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the quality of studies funded by the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research, 2010-2020.\",\"authors\":\"Dan Even, Moshe Leshno, Avi Porath\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13584-025-00672-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research is the basis of advancement in health and wellbeing in modern societies. Our study aims to examine the funding policy of the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research (NIHP), a national foundation responsible for assessing the impact of the national Health Insurance Law on health services in Israel. The study aims to evaluate the studies funded from 2010 to 2020, considering their publication in scientific literature and other channels that may influence decision-makers. We compare findings to a previous internal examination of studies funded by the NIHP during 1996-2014. Our paper presents an approach for measuring the impact of health policy research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All 378 studies funded by NIHP during the specified years were identified. Objective data were gathered by investigating scientific literature across three datasets: Web of Science (WOS), PubMed, and Google Scholar, including journal impact factor, quarterly index, and citation metrics. Concurrently, a questionnaire was developed to collect additional and subjective data from principal investigators of the funded research projects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the final sample of 364 studies funded by NIHP from 2010 to 2020, after 11 were cancelled, and 3 were duplicates. 436 publications were retrieved in peer-reviewed journals. The average time elapsed from funding to scientific publication was 4.65 years. Metric parameters for the top publications of 231 funded studies with at least one publication in peer-reviewed journals revealed an average journal impact factor of 5.97 points and an average of 7.82 citations according to WOS and 14 citations according to Google Scholar. A comparison to 459 funded studies from 1996 to 2014 found a twofold increase in the impact factor. Nearly half of the principal investigators reported some influence on policy processes in the questionnaires, and the majority of the studies were also reported in popular media outlets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study provides an overview of the quality and potential influence of studies funded by NIHP, dedicated to supporting research in the field of health policy in Israel. Some of the findings are supported by results from similar inquiries. Several recommendations are introduced to enhance the quality and impact of the funded studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881469/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-025-00672-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-025-00672-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:研究是现代社会健康和福祉进步的基础。我们的研究旨在检查以色列国家卫生政策研究所(NIHP)的资助政策,NIHP是一个负责评估国家健康保险法对以色列卫生服务影响的国家基金会。该研究旨在评估2010年至2020年资助的研究,考虑到它们在科学文献和其他可能影响决策者的渠道上的发表。我们将研究结果与之前在1996-2014年期间由NIHP资助的研究的内部检查进行了比较。我们的论文提出了一种衡量卫生政策研究影响的方法。方法:在指定年份由NIHP资助的所有378项研究被确定。通过调查Web of Science (WOS)、PubMed和谷歌Scholar三个数据集的科学文献,收集客观数据,包括期刊影响因子、季度指数和引文指标。同时,还编制了一份问卷,从受资助研究项目的主要研究人员那里收集额外的主观数据。结果:在2010 - 2020年NIHP资助的364项研究的最终样本中,有11项被取消,3项被重复。在同行评议的期刊中检索了436篇出版物。从资助到发表的平均时间为4.65年。231项资助研究中,在同行评议期刊上至少发表过一篇文章的顶级出版物的指标参数显示,根据WOS,平均期刊影响因子为5.97分,平均引用7.82次,根据谷歌Scholar,平均引用14次。对1996年至2014年459项资助研究的比较发现,影响因子增加了两倍。近一半的主要研究人员在调查问卷中报告了对政策进程的一些影响,大多数研究也在大众媒体上进行了报道。结论:该研究概述了国家卫生政策方案资助的研究的质量和潜在影响,该方案致力于支持以色列卫生政策领域的研究。其中一些发现得到了类似调查结果的支持。为提高获资助研究的质素和影响,本报告提出了若干建议。
Assessing the quality of studies funded by the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research, 2010-2020.
Background: Research is the basis of advancement in health and wellbeing in modern societies. Our study aims to examine the funding policy of the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research (NIHP), a national foundation responsible for assessing the impact of the national Health Insurance Law on health services in Israel. The study aims to evaluate the studies funded from 2010 to 2020, considering their publication in scientific literature and other channels that may influence decision-makers. We compare findings to a previous internal examination of studies funded by the NIHP during 1996-2014. Our paper presents an approach for measuring the impact of health policy research.
Methods: All 378 studies funded by NIHP during the specified years were identified. Objective data were gathered by investigating scientific literature across three datasets: Web of Science (WOS), PubMed, and Google Scholar, including journal impact factor, quarterly index, and citation metrics. Concurrently, a questionnaire was developed to collect additional and subjective data from principal investigators of the funded research projects.
Results: In the final sample of 364 studies funded by NIHP from 2010 to 2020, after 11 were cancelled, and 3 were duplicates. 436 publications were retrieved in peer-reviewed journals. The average time elapsed from funding to scientific publication was 4.65 years. Metric parameters for the top publications of 231 funded studies with at least one publication in peer-reviewed journals revealed an average journal impact factor of 5.97 points and an average of 7.82 citations according to WOS and 14 citations according to Google Scholar. A comparison to 459 funded studies from 1996 to 2014 found a twofold increase in the impact factor. Nearly half of the principal investigators reported some influence on policy processes in the questionnaires, and the majority of the studies were also reported in popular media outlets.
Conclusions: The study provides an overview of the quality and potential influence of studies funded by NIHP, dedicated to supporting research in the field of health policy in Israel. Some of the findings are supported by results from similar inquiries. Several recommendations are introduced to enhance the quality and impact of the funded studies.