Amal Zaman, Hammad A Fadlalmola, Sara E Ibrahem, Fathia H Ismail, Huda H Abedelwahed, Amira M Ali, Nafesa H Abdelgadim, Amna M A Mustafa, Insaf H Ahmed, Nasreldeen M Ahmed, Amna A Eltyeb, Dalia A Gaafar, Soad M Alnassry, Afaf A Adam, Nagat S Yasin, Rasha A Ali, Aida A Fadlalla, Amira E Eltayeb, Amira M Saad
{"title":"产前教育对母亲自我效能感、分娩恐惧和分娩结局的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Amal Zaman, Hammad A Fadlalmola, Sara E Ibrahem, Fathia H Ismail, Huda H Abedelwahed, Amira M Ali, Nafesa H Abdelgadim, Amna M A Mustafa, Insaf H Ahmed, Nasreldeen M Ahmed, Amna A Eltyeb, Dalia A Gaafar, Soad M Alnassry, Afaf A Adam, Nagat S Yasin, Rasha A Ali, Aida A Fadlalla, Amira E Eltayeb, Amira M Saad","doi":"10.18332/ejm/200747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antenatal education programs aim to prepare expectant mothers for childbirth and early parenthood. This meta-analysis assessed the impact of these programs on maternal psychological outcomes and birth experiences, focusing on childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and maternal and neonatal outcomes, including rates of vaginal delivery, cesarean section, Apgar scores, and birth weight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library until July 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antenatal education to standard care were included. Data were synthesized using meta-analysis with standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty studies were reviewed, with 31 eligible for meta-analysis. Among 1116 pregnant women, antenatal education significantly increased childbirth self-efficacy (SMD=2.00; 95% CI: 1.06-2.95, p<0.0001) and decreased fear of childbirth (SMD= -1.26; 95% CI: -1.79 - -0.74, p<0.00001). Maternal outcomes showed higher vaginal delivery rates (RR=1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.16, p=0.0004) and lower cesarean rates (RR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.70-0.92, p=0.001). No significant differences were found in episiotomy rates, Apgar scores, or birth weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antenatal education improves maternal psychological outcomes and promotes vaginal delivery. However, high heterogeneity and potential bias in the studies limit generalizability. More research is needed on long-term impacts and effectiveness in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"9 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of antenatal education on maternal self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Amal Zaman, Hammad A Fadlalmola, Sara E Ibrahem, Fathia H Ismail, Huda H Abedelwahed, Amira M Ali, Nafesa H Abdelgadim, Amna M A Mustafa, Insaf H Ahmed, Nasreldeen M Ahmed, Amna A Eltyeb, Dalia A Gaafar, Soad M Alnassry, Afaf A Adam, Nagat S Yasin, Rasha A Ali, Aida A Fadlalla, Amira E Eltayeb, Amira M Saad\",\"doi\":\"10.18332/ejm/200747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antenatal education programs aim to prepare expectant mothers for childbirth and early parenthood. This meta-analysis assessed the impact of these programs on maternal psychological outcomes and birth experiences, focusing on childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and maternal and neonatal outcomes, including rates of vaginal delivery, cesarean section, Apgar scores, and birth weight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library until July 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antenatal education to standard care were included. Data were synthesized using meta-analysis with standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty studies were reviewed, with 31 eligible for meta-analysis. Among 1116 pregnant women, antenatal education significantly increased childbirth self-efficacy (SMD=2.00; 95% CI: 1.06-2.95, p<0.0001) and decreased fear of childbirth (SMD= -1.26; 95% CI: -1.79 - -0.74, p<0.00001). Maternal outcomes showed higher vaginal delivery rates (RR=1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.16, p=0.0004) and lower cesarean rates (RR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.70-0.92, p=0.001). No significant differences were found in episiotomy rates, Apgar scores, or birth weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antenatal education improves maternal psychological outcomes and promotes vaginal delivery. However, high heterogeneity and potential bias in the studies limit generalizability. More research is needed on long-term impacts and effectiveness in low-resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/200747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/200747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前言:产前教育项目旨在帮助孕妇做好分娩和早期为人父母的准备。本荟萃分析评估了这些项目对产妇心理结果和分娩经历的影响,重点关注分娩自我效能感、分娩恐惧、产妇和新生儿结果,包括阴道分娩率、剖宫产率、阿普加评分和出生体重。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、SCOPUS和Cochrane Library,检索截止至2024年7月。包括比较产前教育与标准护理的随机对照试验(rct)。采用meta分析对连续结局的标准化平均差异(SMD)和二分结局的风险比(RR)进行综合。结果:共回顾了40项研究,其中31项符合meta分析的要求。1116名孕妇中,产前教育显著提高分娩自我效能感(SMD=2.00;结论:产前教育可改善产妇心理状况,促进阴道分娩。然而,研究的高异质性和潜在的偏倚限制了推广。需要对低资源环境下的长期影响和有效性进行更多的研究。
The role of antenatal education on maternal self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Introduction: Antenatal education programs aim to prepare expectant mothers for childbirth and early parenthood. This meta-analysis assessed the impact of these programs on maternal psychological outcomes and birth experiences, focusing on childbirth self-efficacy, fear of childbirth, and maternal and neonatal outcomes, including rates of vaginal delivery, cesarean section, Apgar scores, and birth weight.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library until July 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antenatal education to standard care were included. Data were synthesized using meta-analysis with standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes.
Results: Forty studies were reviewed, with 31 eligible for meta-analysis. Among 1116 pregnant women, antenatal education significantly increased childbirth self-efficacy (SMD=2.00; 95% CI: 1.06-2.95, p<0.0001) and decreased fear of childbirth (SMD= -1.26; 95% CI: -1.79 - -0.74, p<0.00001). Maternal outcomes showed higher vaginal delivery rates (RR=1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.16, p=0.0004) and lower cesarean rates (RR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.70-0.92, p=0.001). No significant differences were found in episiotomy rates, Apgar scores, or birth weight.
Conclusions: Antenatal education improves maternal psychological outcomes and promotes vaginal delivery. However, high heterogeneity and potential bias in the studies limit generalizability. More research is needed on long-term impacts and effectiveness in low-resource settings.