物理治疗学生的财务焦虑、财务自我效能和一般社会支持:评估的信度。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Tara Dickson, Edward P Mulligan, Yuyan Xia, Patrick S Pabian
{"title":"物理治疗学生的财务焦虑、财务自我效能和一般社会支持:评估的信度。","authors":"Tara Dickson, Edward P Mulligan, Yuyan Xia, Patrick S Pabian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educational debt continues to increase across the health professions. Assessment tools for financial self-efficacy and social support have not been evaluated for reliability among any group of health professions students, though research suggests they may mitigate financial anxiety. This study assesses the reliability of tools measuring financial anxiety, financial self-efficacy, and general social support in a graduate health profession student population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Financial Anxiety Scale (FAS), Financial Self-Efficacy Scale (FSES), and General Social Support Scale (GSSS) were completed by 510 physical therapist students. Item response theory was used to assess reliability and item fit for each assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All studied measures are reliable and demonstrate good item fit among the population of physical therapist students in the United States. The analysis showed that the three scales meet the conditions for a good fit with the data, that their general factors explain a sufficient proportion of the variance, and that the psychometric properties of individual items are acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAS and FSES provide a large amount of test information for physical therapist students. The GSSS, by contrast, may be best utilized as a screening tool for those who have very low levels of general social support.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"54 1","pages":"e57-e69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Anxiety, Financial Self-Efficacy, and General Social Support Among Physical Therapy Students: Reliability of Assessments.\",\"authors\":\"Tara Dickson, Edward P Mulligan, Yuyan Xia, Patrick S Pabian\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Educational debt continues to increase across the health professions. Assessment tools for financial self-efficacy and social support have not been evaluated for reliability among any group of health professions students, though research suggests they may mitigate financial anxiety. This study assesses the reliability of tools measuring financial anxiety, financial self-efficacy, and general social support in a graduate health profession student population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Financial Anxiety Scale (FAS), Financial Self-Efficacy Scale (FSES), and General Social Support Scale (GSSS) were completed by 510 physical therapist students. Item response theory was used to assess reliability and item fit for each assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All studied measures are reliable and demonstrate good item fit among the population of physical therapist students in the United States. The analysis showed that the three scales meet the conditions for a good fit with the data, that their general factors explain a sufficient proportion of the variance, and that the psychometric properties of individual items are acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAS and FSES provide a large amount of test information for physical therapist students. The GSSS, by contrast, may be best utilized as a screening tool for those who have very low levels of general social support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"e57-e69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卫生专业的教育债务继续增加。财务自我效能和社会支持的评估工具尚未在任何一组健康专业学生中进行可靠性评估,尽管研究表明它们可能减轻财务焦虑。本研究评估了衡量财务焦虑、财务自我效能和一般社会支持的工具在卫生专业研究生群体中的可靠性。方法:对510名物理治疗师学生进行财务焦虑量表(FAS)、财务自我效能量表(FSES)和一般社会支持量表(GSSS)的问卷调查。项目反应理论用于评估每个评估的信度和项目契合度。结果:所有研究的测量都是可靠的,并且在美国的物理治疗师学生群体中显示出良好的项目拟合。分析表明,三个量表满足了与数据良好拟合的条件,它们的一般因素解释了方差的足够比例,并且单个项目的心理测量特性是可以接受的。结论:FAS和FSES为物理治疗师学生提供了大量的测试信息。相比之下,GSSS可能最适合作为一般社会支持水平非常低的人的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial Anxiety, Financial Self-Efficacy, and General Social Support Among Physical Therapy Students: Reliability of Assessments.

Background: Educational debt continues to increase across the health professions. Assessment tools for financial self-efficacy and social support have not been evaluated for reliability among any group of health professions students, though research suggests they may mitigate financial anxiety. This study assesses the reliability of tools measuring financial anxiety, financial self-efficacy, and general social support in a graduate health profession student population.

Methods: The Financial Anxiety Scale (FAS), Financial Self-Efficacy Scale (FSES), and General Social Support Scale (GSSS) were completed by 510 physical therapist students. Item response theory was used to assess reliability and item fit for each assessment.

Results: All studied measures are reliable and demonstrate good item fit among the population of physical therapist students in the United States. The analysis showed that the three scales meet the conditions for a good fit with the data, that their general factors explain a sufficient proportion of the variance, and that the psychometric properties of individual items are acceptable.

Conclusions: The FAS and FSES provide a large amount of test information for physical therapist students. The GSSS, by contrast, may be best utilized as a screening tool for those who have very low levels of general social support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信